I don't think Biden has any realistic chance of winning TX?
I guess buying a Tesla doesn't mean what it used to mean...meanwhile I just saw my first Kennedy24 bumper sticker yesterday. On a Tesla.
Are you in the Bay Area as well? Definitely true as I'm always surrounded by Teslas wherever I go.There are so many Tesla in SF Bay Area. They are likely Pius from 15 years (20?) ago.
I think you're right that he might appeal to a certain type of hipsters.Back to the topic though—think Kennedy support may be some type of hipster contrarianism. He's got a snowball's chance in hell of winning.
That's a much larger issue that the whole world will have to deal with, I don't see any good solutions other than radical ideas like UBI.There are definitely worry about automation would remove ports related jobs. Per the article, one of the sticking point is no reduction of jobs due to automations.
I agree that Shapiro appears to be the strongest candidate. And based on the 2000 election, Joe Lieberman's Jewishness was not a real factor based on what I remember, so I think we are ready for Jewish VP.On the VP front, from what I have been gleaning it really seems like PA is key so Shapiro seems kinda like the most logical selection. The Isreal/Gaza issue, as bad as it is, I don't think is a particularly effective attack vector by the repubs however given their base likely couldn't point out Israel on a map and are more concerned about gas prices and inflation. As such, he seems to be the strongest candidate to me at the moment.
Agreed.As an ex-rural person, I think it's the religion overlap with rural that makes it primarily conservative vs Bernie-esque rural communities. Religion in rural communities is often the most conservative of the religions (evangelicals) with a feedback loop. The religion is conservative so they tend towards conservative politics which then modifies the religion to be more conservative which makes the politics run to the right, etc.
Agreed that he is quite complementary to Harris; my primary concern is for the Democrats to win the election and Walz appears to give her the best chance of doing so.I think Walz works well for the ticket because Harris is, in addition to the perception issues of being a mixed-race woman, easily portrayed as a coastal smarty-pants lawyer. Walz is like central casting blue-collar Midwestern, state school type, plus a long time in Army National Guard enlisted. He was apparently promoted to Command Sergeant Major of his battallion but left the guard before completing the required school for it.
Given that the VP's portfolio is basically Senate tiebreakers and whatever diplomatic or domestic issues POTUS assigns, Walz is a good choice when a charm or warmth is needed.
What didn't you like about your high school teachers?As someone who grew up very near Eau Claire, I've been watching some of today's rally (my dad is there now: had to stand in the sun for at least 4 hours, they couldn't bring water or chairs in, is still waiting in his car to leave!), my biggest problem with Walz is that he sounds way too much like some of my high school teachers. That's 100% what this campaign needs, but it's a (very minor, and I'm not a "vibes" voter anyway) negative point for me. There's reasons I left the midwest!
I would like this to be true but is it true?Capitalism and Mega Capitalists don’t need Democracy and in a lot of cases don’t want Democracy.
I hope so.They're talking about price gouging, and having the FTC define and enforce it in the food industry.
Definitely agreed, I also believe the popular vote difference would be less than 10% between the two candidates even given the momentum of Harris' campaign, and it is rather unfortunate.It takes more than one electoral disaster to end a party in the US. Otherwise the Democrats would have disbanded and been replaced after 1984. It takes a string of disasters. And much as I think it's fair to say Trump cost the Republicans elections in 2018, 2020, and 2022, sadly none of them were on the scale of disasters. And it's unlikely 2024 will be either. Mondale failed to reach 41% of the vote in 1984. Trump will get somewhere between 44% and 47%, you can take that to the bank.
Mesa was dubbed the most conservative city with over 250K population in a 2014 study.Mesa has a big LDS population (and Giles is LDS). That is a bloc that did tend to vote for Trump the last two elections, but supposedly more in a hold-their-noses-and-vote-for-the-Republican way, at least compared to religious Republicans more broadly. I'm not surprised Mesa would produce an anti-Trump Republican of such an ilk. As an example, Romney is also LDS.
I believe politics was always beholden to money but it seems to be more blatant now?You are correct but there can't be a 'free' press when they're beholden to advertisers and money-men.
How that gets fixed? No telling.
To be fair, he started at Fordham, which is a decent four-year college.Yeah, he started at a community college and then transferred to Penn.
I agree 99%When an election is a referendum on Fascism vs Democracy, if you don't explicitly vote for the only realistic candidate representing Democracy you're saying it's okay if Fascism wins this round.
I can confirm that the IRA is having a huge impact on the clean energy industry.Interesting economic and environmental news...
NBC - Led by the South, clean energy sector added more than 150,000 jobs last year
Not that this is going to change the opinions of those critical of Biden's handling of the economy, or green energy jobs, or government...
It makes me a little suspicious to see Harris trailing in WI and MI; I think she is relatively safe in those two states.New set of Altas polls. Its a high quality pollster showing a very close race, with Harris losing most of the battleground states by a few points. Other polls show Harris doing better in some of these states like PA, but atlas is a good pollster so its worth paying attention to.
Agreed that if Harris can't win the 18-29 group she'll lose.Well, they got one thing right. If Hispanics and 18-29 year olds break hard for Trump, Harris will definitely lose. Pollsters generally add a secret sauce to make the raw polling results match their likely voter model... and in most cases, today that means adding extra weight to the Trump voters to account for undersampling in 2016 and 2020.
I'm not saying Harris is definitely going to win, but this poll seems pretty broken.
Nevada looks like a Harris win, Arizona is a likely loss....Nevada has under 10k votes registered. Not a good baseline on that yet.
Arizona Dems have to make up a deficit for sure. I find it odd that Kari Lake is losing between +5 and +12. But Harris is -1.6 right now.
I'm of course very happy to see your numbers, but isn't it true that the early voters are historically mostly Democrats?I'm not looking at polls anymore, just votes now.
I think RFK Jr. is beyond redemption already.What is wild about this is checking his credentials. He's an attorney and politician. Not saying that laymen have no basis for weighing in, but what evidence-based information is he basing his assertions on. Sure, some of his proposals make sense, but others are off the charts. In particular, his COVID-19 misinformation.
Again—it's all well-and-good to make bold assertions, provided there is solid evidence to back it up. He doesn't appear to have it. Instead, he has a number of questionable motives. Are we looking at Lysenkoism 2.0?
Adam Schiff?There are currently no national Democrats politicians who are known as bullies though, right? I assume ever the right would call Trump a bully. There are probably other GOP politicians would be known as bullies.