Welcome to a trade war. It's politically inadvisable for the Canadian government to do business with US corporations right now, especially those who are tied to Musk. Since Ford is a politician, he's doing the right thing in the eyes of his constituents.The contract, signed in November, was intended to provide high-speed Internet to 15,000 eligible homes and businesses in rural, remote and northern communities by June of this year. Musk is "part of the Trump team that wants to destroy families, incomes, destroy businesses," Ford said at a news conference Monday. "He wants to take food off the table of people—hard-working people—and I'm not going to tolerate it."
Cancelling a government contract with a company because you disagree with their owner's politics seems no better legally than entering into a government contract with a company because you agree with their owner's politics.
It will be interesting to see if such a decision survives judicial review.
As someone who has consistently supported SpaceX, was excited about Starlink, and even got yelled at right here for suggesting we could give Elon the benefit of the doubt regarding his Nazi solutes, **** him and his businesses. He is illegally accessing government computer systems, illegally obstructing payments of government contracts, illegally attempting to shut down an entire federal agency, and is doing god only knowns what else.
He should be arrested and SpaceX should be seized in the interest of national security.
What an amazing level of understatement, how shocking here.Some risk on the horizon
Now is the time for self sacrifice and to put the needs of humanity and our country above personal interestsIf you're reading the comments, I'd pack up here.
Those top two perfectly describe where this is about to go.
Personally I have a mixture of awe and despair.
Sure, if you define "politics" as "desire to dismantle the US government, completely tank the economy and replace the dollar with Bitcoin," sure.Cancelling a government contract with a company because you disagree with their owner's politics seems no better legally than entering into a government contract with a company because you agree with their owner's politics.
And that's why "normal" countries don't put CEOs in government, because legislation and policy doesn't mix with founder mode. Even better, government and policymakers are not allowed to have business interests or receive contributions of any kind. Because remember... they're all supposed to be working for the people who elect them. Not the corps with the biggest lobby budget.The contract, signed in November, was intended to provide high-speed Internet to 15,000 eligible homes and businesses in rural, remote and northern communities by June of this year. Musk is "part of the Trump team that wants to destroy families, incomes, destroy businesses," Ford said at a news conference Monday. "He wants to take food off the table of people—hard-working people—and I'm not going to tolerate it."
Cancelling a government contract with a company because you disagree with their owner's politics seems no better legally than entering into a government contract with a company because you agree with their owner's politics.
It will be interesting to see if such a decision survives judicial review.
The key takeaway I want everybody to walk away with is, if SpaceX was building the Starlink system to pay for a Mars colony, we've got evidence that the company will generate the type of free cash flows from the business that could pay for said endeavor
A trade war, for now. Trump's expansionist aspirations may kick tensions up a notch or three in the coming years. Might be wise to hope for the best, but prepare for the worst.Welcome to a trade war. It's politically inadvisable for the Canadian government to do business with US corporations right now, especially those who are tied to Musk. Since Ford is a politician, he's doing the right thing in the eyes of his constituents.
Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their countryEvery decent human being on the planet should cancel their starlink subscription.
Here's to hoping for many many more launch failures!
Yep. I used to be a fan of SpaceX but now it doesn't matter. If the end of SpaceX means Musk loses power, it's a good thing.If you support spacex, you support musk.
if you support musk, you support evil.
It's quite frankly that simple.
Nationalize it.
Or a telegram which fun fact are a thing that still existsIf I had to I'd rather use a carrier pigeon![]()
Blown away anyone is defending blatantly illegal behavior from Musk
Too late, the entity that could nationalize it is now run by the entity that would be nationalized.Nationalize it.
Yeah, run government like a business!That's sort of happened but in the backwards way. Musk is functionally president / the US government now.
Screw Musk
if you vote lesser evil, you support evil. It's that simple.
I can only get internet service from Starlink because decades of lesser-evil voting resulted in a government that had no interest in ensuring that broadband funding recipients actually use the money to provide service.
I have no choice but to support SpaceX, therefor I am evil.
Current plans to fund broadband in my area are focused on giving AT&T funding to upgrade AT&T's network, and are not focused on bringing wireline service to areas where there are no wireline options.
More than likely, I will always be beholden to Starlink for access to the internet.
Without looking at the contract, it's hard to say if it's strictly legal but I'll bet it'll get through any review. This is more that just "not liking politics", the US has declared economic war on Canada and Musk is basically part of the government. Note that you won't be able to buy US beer, liquor or wine in Ontario next week either. There's a billion dollars (Canadian) of sales that just disappeared.I'm not questioning if it is good politics - I'm questioning if the courts will determine it's legal.
To put it another way, would you expect the courts to allow a future right wing Canadian administration to cancel contracts with companies they deemed too liberal?