Performance like an RTX 4060, but it's packed into a slightly heavy Surface-like.
See full article...
See full article...
My apologies, I was reading this in a quick gap between back-to-back meetings and my mind read laptop.This is a tablet.
I'm sorry, I misread the article. I was thinking gaming laptop.Which one? I’ve all but given up on that.
I think he means you'd expect to see it as an on-the-go system, "but there’s a lot of frame-rendering and multicore processing power inside this glass-fronted slab with a keyboard cover."As a Tim, I love the phrase "Tim in Product". But what does it mean? Did someone fall into the code vat? That something extra that the PHB or marketing needs to close the deal? Unfortunately, a search just led me back to this article. Is it self-recursive, self-reflexive, or maybe just a bad BASIC construct...
A spec-compliant 60W / 65W USB-PD charger (really an AC/DC power adapter) will almost definitely work with any spec-compliant USB-PD capable laptop.A 60W or 65W power USB-C power brick should work but it's not guaranteed. The device is allowed to say what power profiles it supports and charger and device don't have overlapping supported profiles it won't charge. It's possible that they require a 100w (or higher) USB-C power brick to charge via USB-C but hopefully they do what they can with a 60w or 65w brick.
You can allocate up to 24 GB to VRAM on the (as-reviewed) 32 GB Z13 SKU.4070 laptop GPU only has 8GB VRAM which is a limiting factor for a number of current games such as Indiana Jones, and certainly future titles. With 32GB (or more) of total system RAM available, the Strix Halo GPU could plausibly be assigned 10, 12, up to 16GB to work with, which should bring real benefits in those VRAM-limited scenarios.
You don't even need to spend that much. You can pick up something like a Swift X, with a Core Ultra 7, 32GB RAM, 4070, gorgeous 14.5" OLED display, lightweight metal build for $1,299.<snipped> You could easily buy a laptop with a 4070 in it for this price. I'm not even talking about some 16"+ gaming monstrosity either. The Asus Zephyrus G14 with a 4070 is around $2200 and I bet you could get a pretty good deal on one in a few months when the 2025 version comes out.
<snipped>
I doubt it's much of a factor at settings you'd actually be able to use on a mobile 4060 performance level device. I have a desktop 3070 and Indiana Jones runs fine, I just can't use the highest texture settings. I'm not saying it's not a potential problem, but I'd rather have a faster GPU than a GPU with more VRAM.4070 laptop GPU only has 8GB VRAM which is a limiting factor for a number of current games such as Indiana Jones, and certainly future titles. With 32GB (or more) of total system RAM available, the Strix Halo GPU could plausibly be assigned 10, 12, up to 16GB to work with, which should bring real benefits in those VRAM-limited scenarios.
Subhead needs a word.Performance like an integrated RTX 4060
typoIn many ways, the Z13 an intriguing if in-between device.
According to Asus' Tech specs for the more expensive GZ302 model, the Asus Z13 comes with an Asus Pen active stylus that uses the MPP (Microsoft Pen Protocol) 2.0.
I didn't find any mention of stylus support in the review, other than a (hopefully) red-herring remark about trying to use a non-active stylus.
Was there an included stylus in the box or the press review kit?
JustJosh showed it with an active stylus and also mentioned in their review that it has pen support.I love my Surface Pros. For notetaking: they fall behind for anything that truly needs a GPU. I've considered moving up to a Surface Pro with Thunderbolt 4 and adding an eGPU that way for things like Blender.
So this looks intriguing. But even Asus' own page for it doesn't list an active stylus or related compatibility. Which... yikes? To me, why even bother with the form factor if you're going to skip having a pressure sensitive stylus? So that would be great to know for sure, as to whether or not it does.
Calling the addition of a headphone jack and USB-A port a "nostalgia nook" makes you part of the problem.
Desire for these ports is not nostalgia. USB-A is still what 90% of new peripherals come with; not to mention the 100% of older, still-perfectly-functional peripherals. And a headphone jack is how one plugs in a pair of freak'n headphones. Ones which will never run out of charge nor require fiddly pairing.
A bit harsh, and USB-C must be a much larger share of newer peripherals(?) — though my pile of older peripherals with captive USB-A cables is still going strong — but I am 100% with you on the 3.5mm jack, more-so as this is a laptop(-alternate).Calling the addition of a headphone jack and USB-A port a "nostalgia nook" makes you part of the problem.
Desire for these ports is not nostalgia. USB-A is still what 90% of new peripherals come with; not to mention the 100% of older, still-perfectly-functional peripherals. And a headphone jack is how one plugs in a pair of freak'n headphones. Ones which will never run out of charge nor require fiddly pairing.
I'm not necessarily using the absolute bleeding edge of peripherals, but the only PC peripheral in my arsenal that uses USB-C for basic connectivity is my Logi Streamcam. The only other device with a USB-C connection is my MX Vertical Mouse, which uses USB-C for the charging port on the device and otherwise plugs into my PC via USB-A.A bit harsh, and USB-C must be a much larger share of newer peripherals(?) — though my pile of older peripherals with captive USB-A cables is still going strong — but I am 100% with you on the 3.5mm jack, more-so as this is a laptop(-alternate).
Been looking for a good all-AMD workstation laptop to use (and of course immediately wipe the disk and install Linux as any workstation user should). This looks nice, but this article seems to be lacking a very important detail: RAM size, and any options on such (and if it is actually in there and I just read over it, sorry). Says 128GB on the Asus website, but I'm hesitant to believe that's actually RAM and not some SSD storage number.
I have an external SSD enclosure that came with a C-to-C cable, but the C-port on my motherboard isn't very stable and tends to DC. Wound up replacing it with C-to-A.I'm not necessarily using the absolute bleeding edge of peripherals, but the only PC peripheral in my arsenal that uses USB-C for basic connectivity is my Logi Streamcam. The only other device with a USB-C connection is my MX Vertical Mouse, which uses USB-C for the charging port on the device and otherwise plugs into my PC via USB-A.
I've seen some wireless mice/keyboards that use USB-C receivers, but they seem to be less popular than just using Bluetooth.
Not the main point of my post, but I get it. I have peripherals from 15-20 years ago which I still use with micro, mini, Superspeed micro and even full USB B. I don’t see myself getting rid of them any time soon. I’m making good use of my stock of USB A to USB-C adapters.I'm not necessarily using the absolute bleeding edge of peripherals, but the only PC peripheral in my arsenal that uses USB-C for basic connectivity is my Logi Streamcam. The only other device with a USB-C connection is my MX Vertical Mouse, which uses USB-C for the charging port on the device and otherwise plugs into my PC via USB-A.
I've seen some wireless mice/keyboards that use USB-C receivers, but they seem to be less popular than just using Bluetooth.
Gaming tablet means gaming mouse, and they are predominantly USB-A, especially if we're talking 4KHz and 8KHz dongles. So having more than one USB-A port would have been nice. Bluetooth mice are just too high-latency for gaming.Not the main point of my post, but I get it. I have peripherals from 15-20 years ago which I still use with micro, mini, Superspeed micro and even full USB B. I don’t see myself getting rid of them any time soon. I’m making good use of my stock of USB A to USB-C adapters.
However, keeping aside desktops (now smaller percent of computer sales vs 10+ years ago), I cannot think of a mainstream laptop in the last 4 years — and likely longer — which did not come with at least one USB-C port (equaling or outnumbering USB A ports in most cases) and in some cases like MacBooks, the dropping of USB A altogether.
Plus, the new handheld gaming computers are all USB-C only too, as are new tablets and phones (as hosts).
10% of new peripherals being USB-C vs 90% being USB A just sounds off to me…
Again, I am wholly in agreement on the 3.5mm jack being an expectation on a laptop(-alternate).
I appreciate the correction. I had mistakenly thought the bus was 128-bit, but it's 256-bit on the AMD chip. This is still half the buswidth of Apple's solution, which is a shame.On-chip bandwidth for 4xLPDDR5X-8000 channels is 256GB/s. Memory bandwidth on the the RTX 5080 is 960GB/s. That's certainly a big gap in the RTX 5080's favor, but it's not the 6-10x you are suggesting -- and the RTX 5080's power consumption is multiple times larger than the power budget for an entire Strix Halo laptop.
That's all true. When all is said and done, Strix Halo's GPU is still a midrange mobile solution -- it's just a midrange mobile solution potentially backed up by enterprise-level VRAM.I appreciate the correction. I had mistakenly thought the bus was 128-bit, but it's 256-bit on the AMD chip. This is still half the buswidth of Apple's solution, which is a shame.
As for the 5080, yes, it's power hungry. However, memory bandwidth is not the only discriminator for performance. The powerful tensor cores on that card act as another multiplier over the mobile chips.
Still, mobile AI is an interesting avenue for future exploration, and I hope Ars can make it part of their testing in the future.