It’s the BOAT: Astronomers observe “brightest of all time” gamma ray burst

Veritas super omens

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,475
Subscriptor++
"Kilonova." And i thought Aldo nova was a good band.

WTF is going on in these comments???

One person basically does a written react video in a post (who cares about one persons trivial reaction to a trivial word???) and it spawns over a dozen tangential comments
Good things can happen where the tangent kisses the curve...
 
Upvote
11 (13 / -2)

Wickwick

Ars Legatus Legionis
37,949
"Kilonova." And i thought Aldo nova was a good band.

WTF is going on in these comments???

One person basically does a written react video in a post (who cares about one persons trivial reaction to a trivial word???) and it spawns over a dozen tangential comments
Welcome to Ars?
 
Upvote
38 (38 / 0)

Aldaros

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
164
Subscriptor++
'Kilonova' has to be one of the stupider neologisms created by contemporary scientists, most of whom sadly lack the training in the classics of earlier generations. What, after all, does it mean? 'A thousand new-something-or-others'. Not at all descriptive. I mean, 'hypernova' might have been better, if it hadn't already been taken. Maybe 'conjunova' or something could have worked, as it at least implies the concept of merging.

In any event, it's just as with 'television': half Greek and half Latin, no good can come of it.

Greek? Latin? Anglo-Saxon? French? What kind of sick mind would mash those up into a language?

... oh. The English.
Small but rather important point, the term television was coined by Constantin Perskyi, a Russian. In addition the term Kilanova was coined by Brian Metzger, an American. Hey why bother with those pesky facts

And if we want to get really pedantic, we could note that Perskyi first used that term while giving a presentation in French. So television is an example of English adapting a French word coined by a Russian and derived from a mix of Greek and Latin roots.

Which leads us back to the real point; namely, that English is an unholy mess of many different languages mashed together into one, and that anyone complaining about the purity of the language is about a thousand years too late.
 
Upvote
28 (28 / 0)
"Kilonova." And i thought Aldo nova was a good band.

WTF is going on in these comments???

One person basically does a written react video in a post (who cares about one persons trivial reaction to a trivial word???) and it spawns over a dozen tangential comments
You say that like it's a bad thing
 
Upvote
16 (16 / 0)

HiggsForce

Ars Praetorian
599
Subscriptor
I was curious what the odds of a gamma ray burst that could be an extinction level-event would be. From some basic googling, I found that it's thought the odds of Earth getting hit by one of these, even over the course of the entire solar system's life, was remote. I also found that the gamm ray burst itself would only be a few times larger than the diameter of Earth, which of course, helps explain why it's such an unlikely event for us.

Gamma ray bursts are directional, but not that directional. At galactic distances they're light-years wide, which is somewhat larger than "a few times larger than the diameter of the Earth".
 
Upvote
11 (11 / 0)
'Kilonova' has to be one of the stupider neologisms created by contemporary scientists, most of whom sadly lack the training in the classics of earlier generations. What, after all, does it mean? 'A thousand new-something-or-others'. Not at all descriptive. I mean, 'hypernova' might have been better, if it hadn't already been taken. Maybe 'conjunova' or something could have worked, as it at least implies the concept of merging.

In any event, it's just as with 'television': half Greek and half Latin, no good can come of it.

Greek? Latin? Anglo-Saxon? French? What kind of sick mind would mash those up into a language?

... oh. The English.
Small but rather important point, the term television was coined by Constantin Perskyi, a Russian. In addition the term Kilanova was coined by Brian Metzger, an American. Hey why bother with those pesky facts

And if we want to get really pedantic, we could note that Perskyi first used that term while giving a presentation in French. So television is an example of English adapting a French word coined by a Russian and derived from a mix of Greek and Latin roots.

Which leads us back to the real point; namely, that English is an unholy mess of many different languages mashed together into one, and that anyone complaining about the purity of the language is about a thousand years too late.

Maybe we need to take a fresh look at Esperanto?
 
Upvote
6 (6 / 0)

sbuso

Ars Centurion
324
Subscriptor++
'Kilonova' has to be one of the stupider neologisms created by contemporary scientists, most of whom sadly lack the training in the classics of earlier generations. What, after all, does it mean? 'A thousand new-something-or-others'. Not at all descriptive. I mean, 'hypernova' might have been better, if it hadn't already been taken. Maybe 'conjunova' or something could have worked, as it at least implies the concept of merging.

In any event, it's just as with 'television': half Greek and half Latin, no good can come of it.

Greek? Latin? Anglo-Saxon? French? What kind of sick mind would mash those up into a language?

... oh. The English.
Small but rather important point, the term television was coined by Constantin Perskyi, a Russian. In addition the term Kilanova was coined by Brian Metzger, an American. Hey why bother with those pesky facts

And if we want to get really pedantic, we could note that Perskyi first used that term while giving a presentation in French. So television is an example of English adapting a French word coined by a Russian and derived from a mix of Greek and Latin roots.

Which leads us back to the real point; namely, that English is an unholy mess of many different languages mashed together into one, and that anyone complaining about the purity of the language is about a thousand years too late.

I'm always surprised by other languages, where the spelling has something to do with the pronunciation 😁
 
Upvote
21 (21 / 0)

Faceless Man

Ars Legatus Legionis
10,863
Subscriptor++
'Kilonova' has to be one of the stupider neologisms created by contemporary scientists, most of whom sadly lack the training in the classics of earlier generations. What, after all, does it mean? 'A thousand new-something-or-others'. Not at all descriptive. I mean, 'hypernova' might have been better, if it hadn't already been taken. Maybe 'conjunova' or something could have worked, as it at least implies the concept of merging.

In any event, it's just as with 'television': half Greek and half Latin, no good can come of it.

Greek? Latin? Anglo-Saxon? French? What kind of sick mind would mash those up into a language?

... oh. The English.
Small but rather important point, the term television was coined by Constantin Perskyi, a Russian. In addition the term Kilanova was coined by Brian Metzger, an American. Hey why bother with those pesky facts

And if we want to get really pedantic, we could note that Perskyi first used that term while giving a presentation in French. So television is an example of English adapting a French word coined by a Russian and derived from a mix of Greek and Latin roots.

Which leads us back to the real point; namely, that English is an unholy mess of many different languages mashed together into one, and that anyone complaining about the purity of the language is about a thousand years too late.

Maybe we need to take a fresh look at Esperanto?
No need to go that far.

The thing about these words, regardless of their origin, is that they are now English words, so it doesn't really matter if they're hybridised from two other root languages.
 
Upvote
13 (13 / 0)
So if the jets had not been pointed at us would we not have observed it at all?
I'd say towards us not at us. The beam's about ten degrees wide. But I think we might still see something at greater angles. Maybe just the subsequent x ray and uv emissions and only if someone happened to be looking in the right direction. But I can't see such an energetic event being totally invisible due to beaming.
You're talking about an "orphan" afterglow, where you don't see the prompt emission because of being off axis, but do see the afterglow. We have found some of these, mostly using optical surveys like ZTF, and I'm sure Vera Rubin will see loads. I will say, for this GRB, Swift triggered on the afterglow, and not the prompt emission (because the Earth was in the way when it went off for Swift). That is a first, we've never had an afterglow bright enough to trigger Swift's autonomous follow-up, so maybe an orphan afterglow could have triggered Swift in a similar way. However, that does raise the question, why haven't we triggered on such an event in 18 years of Swift operations, if such bright ones exist off-axis. After all, there are way more off-axis GRBs than on-axis ones.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)
I was curious what the odds of a gamma ray burst that could be an extinction level-event would be. From some basic googling, I found that it's thought the odds of Earth getting hit by one of these, even over the course of the entire solar system's life, was remote. I also found that the gamm ray burst itself would only be a few times larger than the diameter of Earth, which of course, helps explain why it's such an unlikely event for us.
People are always worried about GRBs killing them, answer is: not likely. Magnetars are what you should be worried about. Back 2004, SGR 1806, which is in our own Galaxy, went of and dumped about 100x as much energy on the Earth as this guy did. If SGR 1806 was local to us, it would have ended all life on Earth. We know around 40 Magnetars in our Galaxy, and there are bound to be load more lurking, we discover about 2 new ones every year.
 
Upvote
11 (11 / 0)

Burned

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,540
If gamma ray astronomy and its close cousin gravitational wave search interest you, please join other Ars citizen scientists as we analyze Fermi LAT and LIGO gravitational wave data in the Einstein@Home project. We're hanging out in the DC Arcana section of the forums along with our computational biology brethren. Our home thread is here.
 
Upvote
10 (10 / 0)

bthylafh

Ars Legatus Legionis
16,748
Subscriptor++
"Kilonova." And i thought Aldo nova was a good band.

WTF is going on in these comments???

One person basically does a written react video in a post (who cares about one persons trivial reaction to a trivial word???) and it spawns over a dozen tangential comments

Welcome to the Internet, which has been like this since Usenet back in the '80s *at least*.
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)

MST2.021K

Ars Praetorian
519
Subscriptor
'Kilonova' has to be one of the stupider neologisms created by contemporary scientists, most of whom sadly lack the training in the classics of earlier generations. What, after all, does it mean? 'A thousand new-something-or-others'. Not at all descriptive. I mean, 'hypernova' might have been better, if it hadn't already been taken. Maybe 'conjunova' or something could have worked, as it at least implies the concept of merging.

In any event, it's just as with 'television': half Greek and half Latin, no good can come of it.

Greek? Latin? Anglo-Saxon? French? What kind of sick mind would mash those up into a language?

... oh. The English.
Small but rather important point, the term television was coined by Constantin Perskyi, a Russian. In addition the term Kilanova was coined by Brian Metzger, an American. Hey why bother with those pesky facts

And if we want to get really pedantic, we could note that Perskyi first used that term while giving a presentation in French. So television is an example of English adapting a French word coined by a Russian and derived from a mix of Greek and Latin roots.

Which leads us back to the real point; namely, that English is an unholy mess of many different languages mashed together into one, and that anyone complaining about the purity of the language is about a thousand years too late.

Maybe we need to take a fresh look at Esperanto?

https://xkcd.com/927/
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

Hydrargyrum

Ars Praefectus
3,752
Subscriptor
GRB 221009A triggered detectors aboard NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, and Wind spacecraft, among others, just as gamma-ray astronomers had gathered for an annual meeting in Johannesburg, South Africa.

I bet it would have been amusing to see everyone's phones pinging with notifications at the same time...
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

llanitedave

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,880
'Kilonova' has to be one of the stupider neologisms created by contemporary scientists, most of whom sadly lack the training in the classics of earlier generations. What, after all, does it mean? 'A thousand new-something-or-others'. Not at all descriptive. I mean, 'hypernova' might have been better, if it hadn't already been taken. Maybe 'conjunova' or something could have worked, as it at least implies the concept of merging.

In any event, it's just as with 'television': half Greek and half Latin, no good can come of it.

All words consist of arbitrary strings of characters, with meaning assigned by context. Why does it matter what language it derives from?

And the context of "kilo" is linguistic history, real or imagined. In that context, it's wrong regardless of the supposed original language. Whoever proposed the term thought that the word "kilo" already meant something, otherwise they wouldn't have chosen it. But it never meant what they thought it did, so yes, they could just as usefully inserted any random string of phonemes. That would have been better, even, because it wouldn't have left people wondering what the proposer was really trying to say.

edit:
It was named on purpose
Wikipedia wrote:
The term kilonova was introduced by Metzger et al. in 2010 to characterize the peak brightness, which they showed reaches 1000 times that of a classical nova. They are 1⁄10 to 1⁄100 the brightness of a typical supernova, the self-detonation of a massive star

Damn, should have read just a little further. Well, at least we're no longer wondering what they were trying to say.
 
Upvote
-1 (2 / -3)

llanitedave

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,880
'Kilonova' has to be one of the stupider neologisms created by contemporary scientists, most of whom sadly lack the training in the classics of earlier generations. What, after all, does it mean? 'A thousand new-something-or-others'. Not at all descriptive. I mean, 'hypernova' might have been better, if it hadn't already been taken. Maybe 'conjunova' or something could have worked, as it at least implies the concept of merging.

In any event, it's just as with 'television': half Greek and half Latin, no good can come of it.

Greek? Latin? Anglo-Saxon? French? What kind of sick mind would mash those up into a language?

... oh. The English.
Small but rather important point, the term television was coined by Constantin Perskyi, a Russian. In addition the term Kilanova was coined by Brian Metzger, an American. Hey why bother with those pesky facts

And if we want to get really pedantic, we could note that Perskyi first used that term while giving a presentation in French. So television is an example of English adapting a French word coined by a Russian and derived from a mix of Greek and Latin roots.

Which leads us back to the real point; namely, that English is an unholy mess of many different languages mashed together into one, and that anyone complaining about the purity of the language is about a thousand years too late.

And here I thought the real point was the observation of a bright gamma ray burst. Silly me!
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

fenncruz

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,611
Subscriptor++
I was curious what the odds of a gamma ray burst that could be an extinction level-event would be. From some basic googling, I found that it's thought the odds of Earth getting hit by one of these, even over the course of the entire solar system's life, was remote. I also found that the gamm ray burst itself would only be a few times larger than the diameter of Earth, which of course, helps explain why it's such an unlikely event for us.
People are always worried about GRBs killing them, answer is: not likely. Magnetars are what you should be worried about.

People are always worrying about magnetars killing the. Honey badgers are what you should be worried about.
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)

Chuckstar

Ars Legatus Legionis
34,849
Assumed the jet would rotate as I thought most objects in the universe did.

Looking at the video I'm obv wrong on the first part - so maybe I'm also wrong in the second?
Jets are emitted along the axis of rotation, so are not rotating like a lighthouse beam the way a pulsar’s beam does.
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)

Chuckstar

Ars Legatus Legionis
34,849
I was curious what the odds of a gamma ray burst that could be an extinction level-event would be. From some basic googling, I found that it's thought the odds of Earth getting hit by one of these, even over the course of the entire solar system's life, was remote. I also found that the gamm ray burst itself would only be a few times larger than the diameter of Earth, which of course, helps explain why it's such an unlikely event for us.
People are always worried about GRBs killing them, answer is: not likely. Magnetars are what you should be worried about.

People are always worrying about magnetars killing the. Honey badgers are what you should be worried about.
Although to be fair, neither one cares. ;)
 
Upvote
6 (6 / 0)
There's a bit of Celtic hiding in the darker corners of the language, too...

English never met a language it didn't want to have a quick stand-up with behind the docks.

We English do love to steal anything of value from any Johnny Foreigner we invade meet.
Off topic, but I found this fascinating when I learnt it:

[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creole_language:24puk40e said:
Wikipedia[/url]":24puk40e]A creole language, or simply creole, is a stable natural language that develops from the simplifying and mixing of different languages into a new one within a fairly brief period of time: often, a pidgin evolved into a full-fledged language.
If it wasn't for the Vikings and Norman invasion, English would be like the Frisian language spoken in the Dutch German border area. English is the product of multiple invasions. Even today 1000 years after the Norman invasion, if you have a Norman surname; you have longer life expectancy, more likely to have a degree and have greater assets.

Just because you have a Norman surname now doesn't mean you have any significant Norman bloodline. As you go back through your family tree, you may find, in fact, that the "prized" Norman surname is a very recent addition to the family tree.
There has been a census taken every 10 years since 1801. Parish records have been a legal requirement since 1538. In a small number of cases, like Kibworth there are records going back to the 13th century. You can actively trace centuries of decent. You are factually incorrect.
 
Upvote
-9 (0 / -9)

Anonymous Chicken

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,514
Subscriptor
There's a bit of Celtic hiding in the darker corners of the language, too...

English never met a language it didn't want to have a quick stand-up with behind the docks.

We English do love to steal anything of value from any Johnny Foreigner we invade meet.
Off topic, but I found this fascinating when I learnt it:

[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creole_language:aobczkbk said:
Wikipedia[/url]":aobczkbk]A creole language, or simply creole, is a stable natural language that develops from the simplifying and mixing of different languages into a new one within a fairly brief period of time: often, a pidgin evolved into a full-fledged language.
If it wasn't for the Vikings and Norman invasion, English would be like the Frisian language spoken in the Dutch German border area. English is the product of multiple invasions. Even today 1000 years after the Norman invasion, if you have a Norman surname; you have longer life expectancy, more likely to have a degree and have greater assets.
Is that a real thing, or perhaps cherry-picking of statistics? For example, Norman surname vs not-Norman surname, with the latter being mixed with all the recent immigrants.
 
Upvote
2 (3 / -1)
There's a bit of Celtic hiding in the darker corners of the language, too...

English never met a language it didn't want to have a quick stand-up with behind the docks.

We English do love to steal anything of value from any Johnny Foreigner we invade meet.
Off topic, but I found this fascinating when I learnt it:

[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creole_language:3rdhll9x said:
Wikipedia[/url]":3rdhll9x]A creole language, or simply creole, is a stable natural language that develops from the simplifying and mixing of different languages into a new one within a fairly brief period of time: often, a pidgin evolved into a full-fledged language.
If it wasn't for the Vikings and Norman invasion, English would be like the Frisian language spoken in the Dutch German border area. English is the product of multiple invasions. Even today 1000 years after the Norman invasion, if you have a Norman surname; you have longer life expectancy, more likely to have a degree and have greater assets.
Is that a real thing, or perhaps cherry-picking of statistics? For example, Norman surname vs not-Norman surname, with the latter being mixed with all the recent immigrants.
Apart from the small but important point that Chinese, Indian and mixed race people all earn on average more than white British.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlab ... itain/2018
 
Upvote
-8 (1 / -9)

Anonymous Chicken

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,514
Subscriptor
There's a bit of Celtic hiding in the darker corners of the language, too...

English never met a language it didn't want to have a quick stand-up with behind the docks.

We English do love to steal anything of value from any Johnny Foreigner we invade meet.
Off topic, but I found this fascinating when I learnt it:

[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creole_language:16z6sld6 said:
Wikipedia[/url]":16z6sld6]A creole language, or simply creole, is a stable natural language that develops from the simplifying and mixing of different languages into a new one within a fairly brief period of time: often, a pidgin evolved into a full-fledged language.
If it wasn't for the Vikings and Norman invasion, English would be like the Frisian language spoken in the Dutch German border area. English is the product of multiple invasions. Even today 1000 years after the Norman invasion, if you have a Norman surname; you have longer life expectancy, more likely to have a degree and have greater assets.
Is that a real thing, or perhaps cherry-picking of statistics? For example, Norman surname vs not-Norman surname, with the latter being mixed with all the recent immigrants.
Apart from the small but important point that Chinese, Indian and mixed race people all earn on average more than white British.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlab ... itain/2018
Thanks for the link. Lots of information in there. Do you have anything about the Norman surname claim? I thought that was particularly interesting, if supported.

Now I feel bad even asking into it. I see there are scientific papers. Oh well, maybe some bedtime reading....
 
Upvote
0 (1 / -1)

azazel1024

Ars Legatus Legionis
14,271
Subscriptor
There's a bit of Celtic hiding in the darker corners of the language, too...

English never met a language it didn't want to have a quick stand-up with behind the docks.

We English do love to steal anything of value from any Johnny Foreigner we invade meet.
Off topic, but I found this fascinating when I learnt it:

[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creole_language:3c1l1xov said:
Wikipedia[/url]":3c1l1xov]A creole language, or simply creole, is a stable natural language that develops from the simplifying and mixing of different languages into a new one within a fairly brief period of time: often, a pidgin evolved into a full-fledged language.

So I guess English is not a creole.

Because one thing English does not do is simplify anything.
 
Upvote
2 (3 / -1)
There's a bit of Celtic hiding in the darker corners of the language, too...

English never met a language it didn't want to have a quick stand-up with behind the docks.

We English do love to steal anything of value from any Johnny Foreigner we invade meet.
Off topic, but I found this fascinating when I learnt it:

[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creole_language:10hf1auf said:
Wikipedia[/url]":10hf1auf]A creole language, or simply creole, is a stable natural language that develops from the simplifying and mixing of different languages into a new one within a fairly brief period of time: often, a pidgin evolved into a full-fledged language.
If it wasn't for the Vikings and Norman invasion, English would be like the Frisian language spoken in the Dutch German border area. English is the product of multiple invasions. Even today 1000 years after the Norman invasion, if you have a Norman surname; you have longer life expectancy, more likely to have a degree and have greater assets.

Just because you have a Norman surname now doesn't mean you have any significant Norman bloodline. As you go back through your family tree, you may find, in fact, that the "prized" Norman surname is a very recent addition to the family tree.
There has been a census taken every 10 years since 1801. Parish records have been a legal requirement since 1538. In a small number of cases, like Kibworth there are records going back to the 13th century. You can actively trace centuries of decent. You are factually incorrect.

No, you may have your Norman surname only as a result of marriage. I have traced my family tree in England back to the mid-15th century, and before that, I can't find my surname, although I know it is of Norman origin. However, there's a hell of a lot of other surnames that show up during that time, And marrying into people with that surname. And that says nothing of cases of divorce/death of a spouse and remarriage.
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

Veritas super omens

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,475
Subscriptor++
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Faceless Man

Ars Legatus Legionis
10,863
Subscriptor++
I was curious what the odds of a gamma ray burst that could be an extinction level-event would be. From some basic googling, I found that it's thought the odds of Earth getting hit by one of these, even over the course of the entire solar system's life, was remote. I also found that the gamm ray burst itself would only be a few times larger than the diameter of Earth, which of course, helps explain why it's such an unlikely event for us.
People are always worried about GRBs killing them, answer is: not likely. Magnetars are what you should be worried about.

People are always worrying about magnetars killing the. Honey badgers are what you should be worried about.
Although to be fair, neither one cares. ;)
Also, by the time you noticed either one, it's probably too late to do anything about it.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)