An engine program should answer questions about General Motors' commitment to F1.
See full article...
See full article...
when the best US drivers have a harder time getting in because of the bias in super license points systems,
I'm not talking about Colton Herta, I'm talking about the points distribution. It's heavily skewed towards the F3-F2 pipeline.If the "best US driver" could manage to have finished better than 10th in Indycar this year or last year he'd have a super license. There's lots to blame F1 about but Colton Herta getting paid $10 million a year to be mediocre is not one of them. Sorry.
and yet there are several indy drivers that have enough super license points to qualify, e.g. O'WardI'm not talking about Colton Herta, I'm talking about the points distribution. It's heavily skewed towards the F3-F2 pipeline.
View attachment 67437
I'm not talking about Colton Herta, I'm talking about the points distribution. It's heavily skewed towards the F3-F2 pipeline.
View attachment 67437
The sport’s growing popularity in the US due to the Netflix show. They may be hoping to the boost the brand’s image with millennials and zoomers that may soon be able to afford a Caddy.There's something I don't understand about this.
F1 is huge pretty much everywhere except the US: is the sales and marketing theory that getting Andretti involved (and Cadillac) is to push F1 visibility in the US?
But the inverse is also something that befuddles me: what's the 'gain' for GM and Cadillac in this? is GM and Cadillac really going to gain substantially from a sales and marketing perspective in the rest of the world? Where in the world does a Cadillac branded F1 car really make a sales impact? not in Europe: not in the Middle East or Asia. Certainly not in China.
So what justifies this massive expenditure?
According to FOM's data US is the fastest growing fan base hence the three US based races.The sport’s growing popularity in the US due to the Netflix show. They may be hoping to the boost the brand’s image with millennials and zoomers that may soon be able to afford a Caddy.
Watching the quals is more exciting than watching the actual race.Sure keep out the Americans and let the rich Europeans have their F1 pure. F1 folks have always had that superior behavior. Why do you think Ford back in the 1960s went against the Europeans.
I just can't see why F1 is so popular. The pole sitter gets to win what 90 percent of the time. Sure is interesting racing. Give me 24 hour sports car racing anytime.
My favorite thing about F1 is that it’s minimally American (outside of the dreadful two American races anyway). No beer koozies or camo shorts. If F1 turns into Indycar, I’m out.
Also why does GM still have multiple brands? Just merge them all into Chevrolet already.
We just had this the past summer in Chicago with the idiotic NASCAR race that the previous Mayor insisted that would be good for the city and the economy. They shut the whole of downtown for a summer weekend and for what? A race that didn't do jack for the city except frustrate everyone who lives here.I live in Vegas, which is basically shut down this week for the F1 race, and has been a disaster area of pointless, expensive, SLOW construction for the past few months in preparation.
I'm looking forward to the Samsung-TaTa-OscarMeyer-SunnyDelight F1 entry running a rebadged Yugo engine.Mercedes, Ferrari, Renault, and Red Bull Powertrains (which took over Honda's engine program last year). Audi is entering as a powertrain constructor in 2026, and Honda is coming back that same year to power Aston Martin, with the Red Bull engine being rebadged as a Ford then, too.
They weren't like this when Haas tried to come in even though the anti-dilution fee was heavily at the forefront of any discussions but they got in anyways.
There's something I don't understand about this.
F1 is huge pretty much everywhere except the US: is the sales and marketing theory that getting Andretti involved (and Cadillac) is to push F1 visibility in the US?
But the inverse is also something that befuddles me: what's the 'gain' for GM and Cadillac in this? is GM and Cadillac really going to gain substantially from a sales and marketing perspective in the rest of the world? Where in the world does a Cadillac branded F1 car really make a sales impact? not in Europe: not in the Middle East or Asia. Certainly not in China.
So what justifies this massive expenditure?
Haas joined in 2014, the anti-dilution fee only got introduced in 2020.
The best US drivers? Like who? There are exactly 0 American drivers at the moment capable of driving an f1 car competitively.This whole ordeal is a farce. Really hard to take F1 seriously as the "pinnacle" of motorsport when the best US drivers have a harder time getting in because of the bias in super license points systems, and a competent American manufacturer produces a bid that meets all requirements but is given the run around. Kick out Haas, they are an embarrassment, let the adults race.
This kind of sounds like someone arguing that the US Mens League Soccer is just as good any top tier Euro league.This whole ordeal is a farce. Really hard to take F1 seriously as the "pinnacle" of motorsport when the best US drivers have a harder time getting in because of the bias in super license points systems, and a competent American manufacturer produces a bid that meets all requirements but is given the run around. Kick out Haas, they are an embarrassment, let the adults race.
Pretty weird they aren't committing from 2026 if they are so serious about it.
I've enjoyed F1 for a while, but since the DtS era started it's only gone downhill. This year has been especially embarrassing. The races all feel like a circus with the inconsistent application of random, severe penalties, heat-stroked drivers, bizarre race safety snafus, and now I hear the FIA didn't understand that the desert can get cold at night? (Vegas GP). It's just too much nonsense, not enough racing. I sure hope Andretti and Cadillac actually know what they're getting themselves into.
"Competitively" is a subjective term, of course. Logan Sargeant is an American driver currently driving in F1 for Williams. While he is certainly not fighting for the lead, and I don't have high expectations, he has earned a point in his rookie year, so that is something.The best US drivers? Like who? There are exactly 0 American drivers at the moment capable of driving an f1 car competitively.
None. Name a single one. Have you been paying attention?
They had a deal. Emphasis on had. It's since expired https://www.crash.net/f1/news/1037942/1/fresh-blow-andretti-s-f1-plans-renault-engine-option-expiresI believe Andretti had already agreed for a deal with Renault/Alpine to supply engines in the interim. Hence why Alpine seemed to be, for a while at least, the only ally they had in the Paddock.
Here's the reuters article on the topic.
There's something I don't understand about this.
F1 is huge pretty much everywhere except the US: is the sales and marketing theory that getting Andretti involved (and Cadillac) is to push F1 visibility in the US?
But the inverse is also something that befuddles me: what's the 'gain' for GM and Cadillac in this? is GM and Cadillac really going to gain substantially from a sales and marketing perspective in the rest of the world? Where in the world does a Cadillac branded F1 car really make a sales impact? not in Europe: not in the Middle East or Asia. Certainly not in China.
So what justifies this massive expenditure?
If the "best US driver" could manage to have finished better than 10th in Indycar this year or last year he'd have a super license. There's lots to blame F1 about but Colton Herta getting paid $10 million a year to be mediocre is not one of them. Sorry.
The deadline for 2026 had lapsedPretty weird they aren't committing from 2026 if they are so serious about it.
A bit OT but I would LOVE to see Max in Indycar. Put him in a Penske, Ganassi, Andretti, or McLaren and see how well he does. Unlike in F1 I don't think it's a given that he would win the championship (unlike in F1). But it would be awfully fun to watch!If the "best US driver" could manage to have finished better than 10th in Indycar this year or last year he'd have a super license. There's lots to blame F1 about but Colton Herta getting paid $10 million a year to be mediocre is not one of them. Sorry.