Except that Boeing's customers, as well as just about everyone at this point, knows that Boeing's missteps and errors are almost solely the result of decisions made by management over the years, not the rank and file.On Wednesday, Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg sent a message to employees warning that "a strike would put our shared recovery in jeopardy, further eroding trust with our customers and hurting our ability to determine our future together."
According to the Arsticle,Boeing might have to pay overtime.
Ashley Belanger said:Philbin has only been with Boeing for six months but already wants changes in mandatory overtime rules.
To anyone downvoting this quoted comment this is in reference to the perception they killed two whistleblowersHitmen are going to be extremely busy taking out the strike organizers. Boeing might have to pay overtime.
The IAM has represented Boeing machinists since 1936.I still remember when Boeing had a happy enough employee base that whenever unionists showed up they got chased away...
they have mandatory overtime.
Boeing is not in a position to lose billions as the strike drags on—since it's already buried in $45 billion in debt.
It’s not even that radical an idea.I would not be inclined to trust management after all the stories of management not caring about safety.
There's plenty of examples of unions overreaching in recent decades but in this case the business needs a complete overhaul at the top before management has a leg to stand on.
Hopefully this is just the first example of a shift away from pro hedge fund austerity policies in business and a switch towards longevity at the expense of the quarterly report.
The past few decades has seen the country enter a very real cultural cold war where those in power are pitting us against each other so we ignore the financial issues they've purposefully brought on us.
To the Boeing Union, fight on!
We desperately need a stakeholder model used in more businesses. shareholders, employees, creditors, suppliers, customers, and the local community should all be equal in who is expected to benefit from a business.
The article reports that the union says it negotiated the best deal they could get without a strike, and that it was up to the members to decide the next step.Curious what was going on with the IAM leadership? Seems like a big miss for them to bring back a deal that 96% of their membership rejected. Could be a negotiating tactic, but it sort of sounds like they didn’t really know what the consensus of their members was.
They will be counting on reps who got Boeing so much business. No free market at play here, unless everybody is out of patience with Boeing and concocts a perfect storm against shareholders and whatever.Boeing may not bounce back after workers strike.
Exactly how old are you? I worked for Boeing for 18years all over the Puget Sound and at no time were the employees so "happy" that they ran off unionists and the Machinists have been union and striking for as long as I can remember.I still remember when Boeing had a happy enough employee base that whenever unionists showed up they got chased away... shows what throwing out ethics and quality does to a company. Others ought to take note.
Can't blame them after hearing all the horror stories.
I am generally QUITE pro-union, but I've worked at a few different places where we were all treated very well, and we beleived in the company and our work.I still remember when Boeing had a happy enough employee base that whenever unionists showed up they got chased away... shows what throwing out ethics and quality does to a company. Others ought to take note.
Can't blame them after hearing all the horror stories.
Hey, they're not going to let any of their contractors slack off either. 20% more hits at the same pay or you're fired!He means the hitmen are going to working overtime.
They've been plowing profits into stock buybacks, rather than investing in the company. The issues with 787, 737 MAX, 777X, Starliner, VC-25B, KC-46 (jeez, the list just keeps going) have required expensive remediation and long delays before they can start selling them and realizing revenue. They've also had to pay compensation to the victims of crashes and to the airlines.So I guess I haven't been paying attention, but where did this debt come from? Equity looting?
And it is absolutely glorious.96%?? Holy shit! That is THE COMPANY. This is not "Boeing workers are on strike."
That makes it sound like some percentage are on strike but the company is still operating.
No, Boeing went on strike. Effectively all of it. The workers absolutely have the C suite by the balls.
If they hold strong, they can get virtually anything. They literally have leverage to replace the entire C suite and everyone with a P or VP title.
I really hope they don't lose sight of the utterly insane amount of power they have right now. If the US government wants Boeing to continue to be a part of its defense program, they'll have to deal with this situation.
Boeing's execs are in their least powerful positions of any roles they've had their entire careers. They are fucking COOKED.
everybody is out of patience with Boeing
Boeing still has one large customer: The Department of Defense. That's a problem in itself!If I was in a meeting and asked on my opinion of continuing doing business with Boeing I would connect a big screen to a laptop and start to show why has Boeing been in the news or in recent years. Most of it is negative.
Stock price is driven largely on hype and public perception not just in facts. The public image of Boeing just keeps getting worse, the public hates the company more and more and the facts are this company has been stuck in a hole for a long time and they got showels to keep digging deeper.
It is a big company yes, but it is not the only option unless you are already stuck in a long term contract with them.
Thing is, contracts do expire so even those companies who decided to wait and see may not do future business with Boeing unless they get their act together.
They aren't getting their act together so far.
I don’t believe that for a second. Boeing is a huge company, with a very diverse portfolio of products and crucial to national interest (no matter how shitty they handle these obligations).Boeing may not bounce back after workers strike.
Unfortunately, that would not materialize that way. At least based on the corporation that I work for. The board gets a "modest" salary, but then gives themselves millions upon millions in stock for a bonus. Thus they control it regardless. And they love those sweet dividends that get taxed far below the level of my income tax.Boeing should've offered them shares if they wanted workers to sacrifice some of their income for the company's survival. The workers would invest their time and effort in becoming part owners in the company. It should also be voting shares so they can throw out the leaders who bankrupted boeing
Which leads me to my next point: Could Biden or Congress pass an act requiring them to go back to work like with the rail workers strike? Because that would absolutely be a bad read for the Harris campaign.
They save money so you hit your bonus targets this year. And when these problems come home to roost your successor just points to you as an excuse. It’s a win-win except for the passengers, the customers, the public, and the shareholders.…
The cause is pretty simply: skipping tests up front, and contracting out major systems and assuming the contractor had the right specs and will build to spec. These "save money" only if you don't count the above costs.