Cosmonauts aboard the Russian segment of the station donned protective equipment.
See full article...
See full article...
Wouldn't it be easier to just make the alcohol in orbit? They have all the ingredients they need, and building a still in near vacuum shouldn't be too hard...As has been mentioned, bootlegging vodka aboard.
If some Russian vodka smells like some kind of solvent (and that's entirely possible) then it's also possible that the usual method of getting booze to the Russian side of the ISS (assuming that's what it was) could be breaking down as more of the Russian economy is stripped of resources and funding to pay for war equipment, etc.
So, hypothetically speaking, a certain favored brand of vodka has been made a certain way, and packaged a certain way for a long time, and was reliable in getting from Earth to the ISS intact, and undetected. But with the Ukrainian war ongoing, impacting Russia's economy, it may be that the bottles are being sourced from a lower quality manufacturer, or the resources for them (for whatever reason) have diminished in quality, or the increasingly shoddy workmanship on the Progress space craft creates far more vibrations on launch and in flight.
Either or both (or neither) could account for a bottle of bootleg hootch to break, accounting for the liquid found and the smell. If the vodka got into something else in the shipment, that may have exacerbated the smell.
I seem to recall a story from back in the day about Russians drinking on their own space stations in the past, so it's probably not unprecedented. It's just the quality of products coming from Russia might well be diminishing to the point that what used to ship without any leakage broke on the most recent trip up there.
If they're not dying right now, it's probably not toxic. And I imagine the air scrubbers can handle the residue. It would also account for their being very tight-lipped about the whole thing, likely because it probably isn't common knowledge among the people in Russia that they drink in space, and get vodka shipped to them via the world's most expensive means of delivery.
Intense shaking followed by microgravity seems like a plausible mechanism for liquids pooling in crevasses or sweating off surfaces to become airborne droplets.TFA mentioned "droplets", that would IMHO imply a bit more than just off‑gassing from some coating. IANAE, though.
"Please note the flight commander has lit the 'No Smoking' sign in the cabin."Moonshine vodka delivery? I've endured enough of samogon in Russia a decade or two ago, and some of it indeed smelled like paint thinner ;-)
Jokes aside, any petrol‑like smell isn't really ideal, whatever it is. Most similarly smelling compounds also rate as not nice in the fire and explosive danger charts. Probably still better than explosive, flammable and toxic MMH leak, of course, but not that much...
Nope. I would not be surprised if it was another cooling system leak, but there's no concrete information.
Borscht is a Ukrainian dish, not Russian.
Remember Maria Zakharova's drunken tirade in the early days of the "Special Operation", in which she tried to justify committing genocide because Ukraine "couldn't share their borscht".
When I saw that they were launching a supply mission from Russia I couldn't believe it. Why are we allowing this with everything going on. There has to be a way that SpaceX could have stepped up and covered their portion of the agreement for supply. How long before Putin decides that a catastrophe is what's needed there?
At minimum, they supply their own Cosmonauts and their side of the station.When I saw that they were launching a supply mission from Russia I couldn't believe it. Why are we allowing this with everything going on. There has to be a way that SpaceX could have stepped up and covered their portion of the agreement for supply. How long before Putin decides that a catastrophe is what's needed there?
The beet soup we think of as borscht in the west is the Ukrainian style of borscht. Borscht encompasses a broader range of soups, though, from a quite wide geography of Eastern Europe and into Asia.Borscht is a Ukrainian dish, not Russian.
Remember Maria Zakharova's drunken tirade in the early days of the "Special Operation", in which she tried to justify committing genocide because Ukraine "couldn't share their borscht".
1960s you say? I worked at a very large and well-known chemical company where an old chemist would "mouth pipette" all sorts of horrendous things in the early 2000s. I can only guess there is someone out there still doing it, safety and health be damned.Which is the form that does have a noticeable odor, is still really toxic, but back in the 1960s at NASA they used to pass around a mug of the stuff so technicians would know what it smells like to know to stay away from it.
The reason for this flagrantly stupid process is because it was the 1960s. The era of rocket ships, gasoline-powered pogo sticks ("if you're not ready for it it'll break your ankles"), and fire extinguishers made with carbon tetrachloride, a chemical so carcinogenic that it was used to induce cancer in rats for cancer research
Moonshine vodka delivery? I've endured enough of samogon in Russia a decade or two ago, and some of it indeed smelled like paint thinner ;-)
Does it, though? I mean, considering what russian technicians have come up with previously on their space craft, like drilling holes, installing gyros upside down with a sledgehammer and what not.The fact that it leaked into the pressurized interior of the spacecraft rules out most of the nasties like hydrazine. It'll have to be something related to climate control to be inside the pressure hull, so your coolant guess seems rather likely.
Yes it does. The real nasty stuff generally don't pipe through the pressurized parts of the hull for a reason. They're generally in the part of the vehicle held at vacuum. It wouldn't surprise me if those systems leaked, such as what we saw with the coolant loop, but they would leak to space.Does it, though? I mean, considering what russian technicians have come up with previously on their space craft, like drilling holes, installing gyros upside down with a sledgehammer and what not.
References to war crimes and trampolines, in such articles, should be mandatory.I'm vaguely nostalgic for the days when any Ars story about Russian space activities included a photo of tiny hard hat Rogozin. Not enough to want the buffoon given any sort of real authority again, mind you, but that image always makes me smile.
Building a zero-g still sounds like a challenge, no matter what pressure you're operating at - you can't use convection to transport the vapour phase to the condenser, and you can't use gravity to collect the condensate.Wouldn't it be easier to just make the alcohol in orbit? They have all the ingredients they need, and building a still in near vacuum shouldn't be too hard...
I mean, we've heard about what US astronauts used to do with Tang, haven't we?
I'd want to check that nothing had crawled into the module and died. I know the smell doesn't seem right, but with the general funk of the ISS, and so forth, who knows?
Yeah, about that carbon tetrachloride. It's only somewhat carcinogenic, but it is extremely toxic to the liver and kidneys. Worse is to come for those putting it in a fire extinguisher, however. While it seems like a good idea, as it is quite good at putting out fires, when mixed with air and heat - a somewhat likely condition when fighting fires - it breaks down. Sometimes chemicals spontaneously rearranging themselves is helpful, such as when we send a rocket up to the Internation Space Station, or quietly and rapidly repairing a damaged ornament before someone notices. Sometimes, however, it is not. In this case, while the unsuspecting person is doing a good thing by trying to put out a fire, the carbon tetrachloride is busy breaking down into phosgene, a thing most notably remembered for its use as a chemical weapon during WW1. If that's not where you know it from, you probably work in plastics manufacturing.Which is the form that does have a noticeable odor, is still really toxic, but back in the 1960s at NASA they used to pass around a mug of the stuff so technicians would know what it smells like to know to stay away from it.
The reason for this flagrantly stupid process is because it was the 1960s. The era of rocket ships, gasoline-powered pogo sticks ("if you're not ready for it it'll break your ankles"), and fire extinguishers made with carbon tetrachloride, a chemical so carcinogenic that it was used to induce cancer in rats for cancer research
The reason for this flagrantly stupid process is because it was the 1960s. The era of rocket ships, gasoline-powered pogo sticks ("if you're not ready for it it'll break your ankles"), and fire extinguishers made with carbon tetrachloride, a chemical so carcinogenic that it was used to induce cancer in rats for cancer research
This is the most likely explanation. Coatings take time to cure. Even "odorless" ones tend to have a unique smell from the VoCs; it's just not a strong one till you're in an enclosed area without ventilation. There's nothing more "enclosed" than a sealed environment surrounded by vacuum. The off gassing will continue till the coatings cure. The onboard filtration will have to do because the astronauts can't just roll down the windows.Could also be related to improperly cured coatings or adhesives.
My first day as chem lab manager at a water analysis lab in 2013, I had to threaten to fire one of the old chemists for mouth pipetting. (He was only pipetting sodium carbonate solution, but had picked up the pipette from a bench stained with potassium dichromate)1960s you say? I worked at a very large and well-known chemical company where an old chemist would "mouth pipette" all sorts of horrendous things in the early 2000s. I can only guess there is someone out there still doing it, safety and health be damned.
First a caveat: I have worked analysing water from heating and cooling systems for many years, but these were all earthbound and non-soviet. The following are semi-educated guesses.I did some digging, and if the Internet is to be trusted, the Progess has two coolant loops. The external loop (the one that leaked before) is filled with iso-octane (LZ-TK-2). That, unsurprisingly, smells very much like gasoline. Not exactly like spray paint, but maybe...
The internal loop uses "a non-toxic aqueous solution of glycerin with anti-corrosion additives" - if it has any smell, it's from the additives. Not clear what those additives are but I'd guess they're water-soluble and dont' smell much like paint.
I'm not sure what sequence of events would let the external coolant into the internal air compartment without also depressurizing the compartment... ?
Other suspects?
The "fuel" aspect of three tons of food, fuel, and supplies would seem like a likely place to start though the first thing is be asking the astronaut saying spray paint would be what kind. Given that astronauts might be visiting factories, the range of spray paint odor they may have experienced in life is huge. Of course, "supplies" could also include things like cleaning fluids, disinfectants, etc.It could be something leaking from the cargo payload. The nature of the cooling fluid inside the Progress does not produce a "spray paint" odor.
This is the most likely explanation. Coatings take time to cure. Even "odorless" ones tend to have a unique smell from the VoCs
Carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) still is used in research - I've used it myself in rat studies to induce HCC just a few years ago. From what I've read, it used to be in all sorts of stuff (like cleaners, refrigerants, and lava lamps) before it got banned (in the 80s, I seem to recall). Not the craziest stuff I've worked with, but you definitely want some extra protective measures in place.Which is the form that does have a noticeable odor, is still really toxic, but back in the 1960s at NASA they used to pass around a mug of the stuff so technicians would know what it smells like to know to stay away from it.
The reason for this flagrantly stupid process is because it was the 1960s. The era of rocket ships, gasoline-powered pogo sticks ("if you're not ready for it it'll break your ankles"), and fire extinguishers made with carbon tetrachloride, a chemical so carcinogenic that it was used to induce cancer in rats for cancer research
The fuel isn't shipped inside the main pressure vessel. It's in the service module. The russian docking adapters are capable of transferring fuel, and the lines for that are also outside the main pressure vessel.The "fuel" aspect of three tons of food, fuel, and supplies would seem like a likely place to start though the first thing is be asking the astronaut saying spray paint would be what kind. Given that astronauts might be visiting factories, the range of spray paint odor they may have experienced in life is huge. Of course, "supplies" could also include things like cleaning fluids, disinfectants, etc.
What bugs me though is, if you've had leaks in these things before, wouldn't you have developed safety precautions for the opening process? Maybe even opening with a hazmat suit on? Some type of video probe? At least crack the hatch for a moment, immediately reclose it, and sniff the air for any new odor rather than a full on entry? I thought this was the realm of constant procedures.