31% of Republicans say vaccines are more dangerous than diseases they prevent

MacBrave

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,174
Subscriptor++
On the other end of the spectrum, 11 percent of the Republican group said vaccinating children was "not important at all," and an additional 8 percent said it was "not very important." For the Democratic group, only 1 percent was reported in each of those categories.
So would these individuals be labeled as Republican-adjacent Democrats?
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)
The data is in. The COVID vaccines are extremely safe. Much safer than getting COVID.

Now you know! And can stop spreading dangerous bullshit. I'm sorry you're one of the very small amount of people with bad side effects, but that doesn't change the overall calculus.
I would not have given him the benefit that he got some side effect. I just suspect he is a plain antivaxer.
 
Upvote
44 (45 / -1)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

poltroon

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,682
Subscriptor
Sadly, because vaccines for many diseases have been so effective, there are at least a couple generations who have never seen how terrible some of the diseases they prevent are. No one who has seen the aftermath of polio or who has seen the immunosuppressive effects of measles would ever think that the vaccine is worse than the disease.
Or a case of tetanus.
 
Upvote
26 (26 / 0)

Frodo Douchebaggins

Ars Legatus Legionis
10,849
Subscriptor
I’d support the Darwin Awards these people should win, but of course most of them were probably safely vaccinated before they became alt-woke or whatever.

They’re more likely denying their children the same protection :(


If you're vaccinated, and then make some sex trophies, and don't get them vaccinated, and they become sterile or die from a disease that they could have been vacinnated for, is that a Darwin Award by Proxy?
 
Upvote
22 (22 / 0)
It comes with a slight bonus, it'll lower the number of members in their base.
If it were just that, I might be okay with them fucking around and finding out.

Sadly, their children will suffer, the immunocompromised will suffer, the very old and very young will suffer...

When all is tallied up, I don't think it works out as being any sort of bonus.
 
Upvote
30 (30 / 0)

megabaseballdork

Ars Centurion
352
Subscriptor++
Basically what you're saying is: "just trust us" without the data being in. And it really was like that. The tests were rushed and some vaccines were pulled because they turned out to be harmful. You are repeating the WHO narrative without much critical examination, it seems. A lot of selective bias seems to exist, from what I read on the subject. I'll take a tetanus vaccine any day. It works and has been proven to work. COVID vaccines? I'm not so sure any more. There was a lot of scaremongering involved to get people to take the jab. And to this day there is little real open debate on the adverse effects of those vaccines. A lot of canned talking points keep getting repeated.
Exactly what we're talking about. They aren't saying "just trust us". These vaccines are perhaps the most tested and scrutinized in history and have billions of doses applied and tracked and are fucking safe. You're just being a jackass.
 
Upvote
128 (130 / -2)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

msawzall

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,414
Basically what you're saying is: "just trust us" without the data being in. And it really was like that. The tests were rushed and some vaccines were pulled because they turned out to be harmful. You are repeating the WHO narrative without much critical examination, it seems. A lot of selective bias seems to exist, from what I read on the subject. I'll take a tetanus vaccine any day. It works and has been proven to work. COVID vaccines? I'm not so sure any more. There was a lot of scaremongering involved to get people to take the jab. And to this day there is little real open debate on the adverse effects of those vaccines. A lot of canned talking points keep getting repeated.
How much research, data, and evidence do you need? And for how long? And most importantly, from whom? Sounds like you will only listen to information if it comes from certain spaces.
 
Upvote
99 (100 / -1)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

Sajuuk

Ars Legatus Legionis
10,884
Subscriptor++
You'd think right wing politicians, after 2022, would have paid a little attention to how they're declining their own demographic. Old people are most likely to vote. Also most likely to die from SARS-COV-2. Getting them vaccinated to live to vote is a no brainer.

And YET!
You don't need voters if you intend to dismantle representative democracy, after all.
 
Upvote
46 (47 / -1)

Oldnoobguy

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,754
Yes, conservatives tend to be more susceptible to conspiracy theories.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abf1234
We could solve so many problems if we could develop a vaccine against conservativism. Good public education is probably the closest to an anti-conservatism vaccine which likely explains why conservatives work so hard to destroy it.
 
Upvote
35 (36 / -1)
If you're vaccinated, and then make some sex trophies, and don't get them vaccinated, and they become sterile or die from a disease that they could have been vacinnated for, is that a Darwin Award by Proxy?
Sadly, it seems like the official Darwin Awards haven't been awarded since 2022. But when they were running, I'm pretty sure that harming an innocent third party was a disqualifying factor.
 
Upvote
22 (22 / 0)

jandrese

Ars Legatus Legionis
13,458
Subscriptor++
You'd think right wing politicians, after 2022, would have paid a little attention to how they're declining their own demographic. Old people are most likely to vote. Also most likely to die from SARS-COV-2. Getting them vaccinated to live to vote is a no brainer.

And YET!
The Republican stalwarts may have died, but they died happy (albeit in a lot of pain) knowing that their body was not injected with Bill Gates mind control chips.
 
Upvote
24 (24 / 0)

Litazia

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,140
Subscriptor
Basically what you're saying is: "just trust us" without the data being in. And it really was like that. The tests were rushed and some vaccines were pulled because they turned out to be harmful. You are repeating the WHO narrative without much critical examination, it seems. A lot of selective bias seems to exist, from what I read on the subject. I'll take a tetanus vaccine any day. It works and has been proven to work. COVID vaccines? I'm not so sure any more. There was a lot of scaremongering involved to get people to take the jab. And to this day there is little real open debate on the adverse effects of those vaccines. A lot of canned talking points keep getting repeated.
I dunno, man, the fact that millions, if not billions, of these vaccines were administered over the course of three years with incredibly few adverse effects suggests that, on the whole, COVID vaccines are safe. You having a severe adverse effect is not proof that the vaccines are inherently unsafe any more than you winning the lottery is a solid retirement plan.
 
Upvote
101 (101 / 0)

OrangeCream

Ars Legatus Legionis
56,641
Not an anti-vaxxer. Just a wait-and-seeer after having to deal with an adverse reaction that had a big impact. Totally different concept.
That’s pretty much the definition of an anti-vaxxer

If you held the same level of concern about car safety after witnessing their fatality rates, you would be essentially saying we can't drive.

To pick apart your whole quote:
As someone who isn't a USA resident, I might be missing something here, but I think it's healthy to be skeptical about vaccines until the evidence is there that they can be trusted.
We have literally hundreds of years of evidence now. The word vaccine literally comes from the word 'from a cow', referencing the discovery that cowpox protects your from smallpox; cowpox has been in use to protect against smallpox since the 16th century

For many vaccines this is the case, but with COVID a set of vaccines was thrust upon us which in hindsight should not have been administered en masse.
You're literally a serial killer. The vaccine recorded 40 or so deaths due to cardiac arrest. In 2022 alone COVID-19 contributed to 244, 986 deaths.

Put another way, in a single data point, 33 people died per 100k if they were unvaccinated, while only 3 people died per 100k if they were vaccinated. Meaning that vaccinating 100k people would prevent 30 deaths. Vaccinating 200k people would prevent 60 deaths.

I'm still suffering the consequences of the improper testing of those vaccines. Sometimes these naysayers have a point. (but in the end the data should prevail)

I feel bad for you, but the data does prevail. We had 111m cases and 1.2m deaths.

Your adverse reaction definitely sucks, but you also were far more likely to die despite the adverse reaction from COVID, which you were able to minimize because of the vaccine.
 
Upvote
92 (94 / -2)

jandrese

Ars Legatus Legionis
13,458
Subscriptor++
"In four years, you don't have to vote again. We'll have it fixed so good, you're not gonna have to vote." - Donald Trump, 7/26/24
That quote is taken out of context. The context makes it so much worse. He's basically promising a bunch of Evangelicals that he will enact a theocracy and give them everything they could ever want in a way that can't be undone by future administrations. He promised them Gilead in order to secure their votes.
 
Upvote
71 (71 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

traxian

Seniorius Lurkius
40
Subscriptor
Is it? I keep seeing stories which seem to paint a wholly different picture and they seem to coincide with my own experience.
Anecdotal stories do not amount to much evidence when it comes to medicine. It is the lowest tier of quality evidence.

For the vast majority of people, vaccines are safe but there are others who are harmed by them. That doesn’t mean that they aren’t safe or efficacious.

1723051390765.png
 
Upvote
59 (59 / 0)

Tofystedeth

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,027
Subscriptor++
Because you’re looking for them and actively engaging in confirmation bias.

For every ‘vaccines did something bad’ story there are a million unwritten ones by people who are alive because of them.

Grow up.
Also we've done billions of doses, as close to literally everyone as we can get without loading doses into tranq guns, in the last 4 years. Our more established vaccines have already passed the mass vaccination campaign stage long before most people here can remember and are now just part of the regular set given to children at various ages.
So a fairly normal rate of complications seems inflated because the time scale is compressed.
 
Upvote
55 (56 / -1)

OrangeCream

Ars Legatus Legionis
56,641
The covid vaccine programs have really allowed the anti-vaxxers to enjoy a renaissance. It was too hard of a sell for the US public to tell them they would need 2 to 3 covid shots annually...AND it wouldn't prevent getting the disease. The vaccines for children that provide lifelong protection have to be marketed differently in the face of all of this (vs annual vaccinations flu or covid).

Drug companies are amazing when it comes to creating demand for drugs that few want or need. Where is the brilliant marketing for vital vaccinations?
There has to be a profit first. If they could charge $1k you would see far more ads for it, and you would see demand go up because people instinctively value expensive things as more precious than free things.
 
Upvote
16 (16 / 0)

deltaproximus

Ars Scholae Palatinae
856
Subscriptor++
I've previously shared my family story of how the youngest aunt on my mom's side survived paralytic polio as a child. One of her legs had it's growth stunted, and twisted inward, requiring her to use a leg brace with lift for life to be able to walk. A milder outcome than what was possible, which she is thankful for. But the polio vaccine was available when she was a kid, all her older siblings got vaccinated. My grandparents just happened to be convinced by anti-vaxxers of the time that they didn't need to vaccinate their 5th child. My grandmother is in her mid 90's now, she still sometimes shares how much guilt she feels not vaccinating my aunt. My aunt has shared her stories of bullying and abuse for being the only crippled kid in her high school.

My family is a strong data point that vaccines are preferable to the diseases they can prevent. But the crazy thing is, my dad's side of the family is very conservative. They've met my aunt, when we are all here in my town for my paternal grandfather's funeral, so they know her story, yet during COVID two of my uncles became anti-vaxxers anyway. And not just anti-covid vaccines, anti all vaccines. I just don't understand how.
 
Upvote
65 (65 / 0)
Sadly, because vaccines for many diseases have been so effective, there are at least a couple generations who have never seen how terrible some of the diseases they prevent are. No one who has seen the aftermath of polio or who has seen the immunosuppressive effects of measles would ever think that the vaccine is worse than the disease.
Just tell them about shingles as I am told that is a great experience. Could be prevented by the chickenpox vaccine (USA added it to childhood schedule in 1995) or the specific shingles vaccine.
 
Upvote
27 (27 / 0)

fitten

Ars Legatus Legionis
53,376
Subscriptor++
I would not be at all surprised if a Republican adminstration would try to outlaw vaccines. That isn't a joke.
That is part of Project 2025. First they make the FDA a political appointment so they can replace the head of the FDA at will. Then they tell the FDA head to simply declare that whatever they want to ban is "not safe" and then it's illegal to use in the entire country. This is the plan for contraception, abortion medications, and at least some vaccines among other things.

Remember... Project 2025 becomes Project 2029 if they don't win. And if they don't win in 2028, it will become Project 2033, etc.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
54 (54 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

jcb9001

Smack-Fu Master, in training
60
The disease of republicanitis is worse than all of them put together. When national elections are decided by a few hundred votes in tiny districts in a few states, the fewer unvaccinated republicans who show up the better.

I'm at my wits end with these diseased freaks. I absolutely give them the Captain Kirk response ("Let them die!"), and by now I have 0 remorse about it -- the only real sadness I feel is that anyone could be so profoundly, relentlessly stupid.
 
Upvote
22 (25 / -3)