The partisan divide on vaccine falsehoods threatens the health of children nationwide.
See full article...
See full article...
So would these individuals be labeled as Republican-adjacent Democrats?On the other end of the spectrum, 11 percent of the Republican group said vaccinating children was "not important at all," and an additional 8 percent said it was "not very important." For the Democratic group, only 1 percent was reported in each of those categories.
And society as a whole.They’re more likely denying their children the same protection![]()
I would not have given him the benefit that he got some side effect. I just suspect he is a plain antivaxer.The data is in. The COVID vaccines are extremely safe. Much safer than getting COVID.
Now you know! And can stop spreading dangerous bullshit. I'm sorry you're one of the very small amount of people with bad side effects, but that doesn't change the overall calculus.
Or a case of tetanus.Sadly, because vaccines for many diseases have been so effective, there are at least a couple generations who have never seen how terrible some of the diseases they prevent are. No one who has seen the aftermath of polio or who has seen the immunosuppressive effects of measles would ever think that the vaccine is worse than the disease.
It's a culture of hateDon't anthropomorphize microbes.
They hate that.
I’d support the Darwin Awards these people should win, but of course most of them were probably safely vaccinated before they became alt-woke or whatever.
They’re more likely denying their children the same protection![]()
If it were just that, I might be okay with them fucking around and finding out.It comes with a slight bonus, it'll lower the number of members in their base.
Exactly what we're talking about. They aren't saying "just trust us". These vaccines are perhaps the most tested and scrutinized in history and have billions of doses applied and tracked and are fucking safe. You're just being a jackass.Basically what you're saying is: "just trust us" without the data being in. And it really was like that. The tests were rushed and some vaccines were pulled because they turned out to be harmful. You are repeating the WHO narrative without much critical examination, it seems. A lot of selective bias seems to exist, from what I read on the subject. I'll take a tetanus vaccine any day. It works and has been proven to work. COVID vaccines? I'm not so sure any more. There was a lot of scaremongering involved to get people to take the jab. And to this day there is little real open debate on the adverse effects of those vaccines. A lot of canned talking points keep getting repeated.
How much research, data, and evidence do you need? And for how long? And most importantly, from whom? Sounds like you will only listen to information if it comes from certain spaces.Basically what you're saying is: "just trust us" without the data being in. And it really was like that. The tests were rushed and some vaccines were pulled because they turned out to be harmful. You are repeating the WHO narrative without much critical examination, it seems. A lot of selective bias seems to exist, from what I read on the subject. I'll take a tetanus vaccine any day. It works and has been proven to work. COVID vaccines? I'm not so sure any more. There was a lot of scaremongering involved to get people to take the jab. And to this day there is little real open debate on the adverse effects of those vaccines. A lot of canned talking points keep getting repeated.
You don't need voters if you intend to dismantle representative democracy, after all.You'd think right wing politicians, after 2022, would have paid a little attention to how they're declining their own demographic. Old people are most likely to vote. Also most likely to die from SARS-COV-2. Getting them vaccinated to live to vote is a no brainer.
And YET!
Sadly, it seems like the official Darwin Awards haven't been awarded since 2022. But when they were running, I'm pretty sure that harming an innocent third party was a disqualifying factor.If you're vaccinated, and then make some sex trophies, and don't get them vaccinated, and they become sterile or die from a disease that they could have been vacinnated for, is that a Darwin Award by Proxy?
The Republican stalwarts may have died, but they died happy (albeit in a lot of pain) knowing that their body was not injected with Bill Gates mind control chips.You'd think right wing politicians, after 2022, would have paid a little attention to how they're declining their own demographic. Old people are most likely to vote. Also most likely to die from SARS-COV-2. Getting them vaccinated to live to vote is a no brainer.
And YET!
I dunno, man, the fact that millions, if not billions, of these vaccines were administered over the course of three years with incredibly few adverse effects suggests that, on the whole, COVID vaccines are safe. You having a severe adverse effect is not proof that the vaccines are inherently unsafe any more than you winning the lottery is a solid retirement plan.Basically what you're saying is: "just trust us" without the data being in. And it really was like that. The tests were rushed and some vaccines were pulled because they turned out to be harmful. You are repeating the WHO narrative without much critical examination, it seems. A lot of selective bias seems to exist, from what I read on the subject. I'll take a tetanus vaccine any day. It works and has been proven to work. COVID vaccines? I'm not so sure any more. There was a lot of scaremongering involved to get people to take the jab. And to this day there is little real open debate on the adverse effects of those vaccines. A lot of canned talking points keep getting repeated.
That’s pretty much the definition of an anti-vaxxerNot an anti-vaxxer. Just a wait-and-seeer after having to deal with an adverse reaction that had a big impact. Totally different concept.
"In four years, you don't have to vote again. We'll have it fixed so good, you're not gonna have to vote." - Donald Trump, 7/26/24You don't need voters if you intend to dismantle representative democracy, after all.
That quote is taken out of context. The context makes it so much worse. He's basically promising a bunch of Evangelicals that he will enact a theocracy and give them everything they could ever want in a way that can't be undone by future administrations. He promised them Gilead in order to secure their votes."In four years, you don't have to vote again. We'll have it fixed so good, you're not gonna have to vote." - Donald Trump, 7/26/24
Anecdotal stories do not amount to much evidence when it comes to medicine. It is the lowest tier of quality evidence.Is it? I keep seeing stories which seem to paint a wholly different picture and they seem to coincide with my own experience.
Also we've done billions of doses, as close to literally everyone as we can get without loading doses into tranq guns, in the last 4 years. Our more established vaccines have already passed the mass vaccination campaign stage long before most people here can remember and are now just part of the regular set given to children at various ages.Because you’re looking for them and actively engaging in confirmation bias.
For every ‘vaccines did something bad’ story there are a million unwritten ones by people who are alive because of them.
Grow up.
There has to be a profit first. If they could charge $1k you would see far more ads for it, and you would see demand go up because people instinctively value expensive things as more precious than free things.The covid vaccine programs have really allowed the anti-vaxxers to enjoy a renaissance. It was too hard of a sell for the US public to tell them they would need 2 to 3 covid shots annually...AND it wouldn't prevent getting the disease. The vaccines for children that provide lifelong protection have to be marketed differently in the face of all of this (vs annual vaccinations flu or covid).
Drug companies are amazing when it comes to creating demand for drugs that few want or need. Where is the brilliant marketing for vital vaccinations?
Just tell them about shingles as I am told that is a great experience. Could be prevented by the chickenpox vaccine (USA added it to childhood schedule in 1995) or the specific shingles vaccine.Sadly, because vaccines for many diseases have been so effective, there are at least a couple generations who have never seen how terrible some of the diseases they prevent are. No one who has seen the aftermath of polio or who has seen the immunosuppressive effects of measles would ever think that the vaccine is worse than the disease.
He promised them Gilead
That is part of Project 2025. First they make the FDA a political appointment so they can replace the head of the FDA at will. Then they tell the FDA head to simply declare that whatever they want to ban is "not safe" and then it's illegal to use in the entire country. This is the plan for contraception, abortion medications, and at least some vaccines among other things.I would not be at all surprised if a Republican adminstration would try to outlaw vaccines. That isn't a joke.
The fatigue I feel from science deniers is hard not to want to respond like Kirk to Spock: Let them die.View attachment 87241
That’s pretty much the definition of an anti-vaxxerNot an anti-vaxxer. Just a wait-and-seeer after having to deal with an adverse reaction that had a big impact. Totally different concept.
Russia or Republicans, does it matter? They're both a threat to public safety and security.How much of this vaccine disinformation is being pushed by Russia? We know their goal is to weaken the West.