We’ve got our first real look at Loki as Disney drops lengthy teaser trailer

citizencoyote

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,342
Subscriptor++
"Smorgasbord" is right. My wife and I watched this trailer/teaser last night and, not knowing what or who the TVA are, were pretty confused by it all. It looked sort of like Quantum Leap, only with a Norse god in place of Sam and Owen Wilson playing Al.

Still, it's piqued our interest enough to check it out when the time comes.
 
Upvote
24 (25 / -1)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

Mazzicc

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,040
Let's be honest, I'd watch it just for Tom Hiddleston. If you haven't seen him in The Night Manager, try to track it down - excellent miniseries.

I do like that Marvel seems to be expanding out of their main universe as it opens up a lot of options they can do without worrying about conflicting.

As long as they keep it so that you can watch most of it in isolation, and the connections are more backstory/side story, I'm good. Character cameos, unimportant "remember ____" lines, etc all make sense.

If it gets to the point that I have to watch all the TV shows in order to know what's happening in a movie or other show, it'll be a problem. I'm willing to admit that movies should be watched in order (usually), and that shared names in particular need to be watched as a series.

But if I'm sitting in a theater (maybe) and going "wait, when did that critical plot moment happen?" and find out it happened in a separate TV show, it starts to become a burden to keep up.
 
Upvote
63 (63 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

Nowicki

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,558
I never understood why they didn't just execute Loki after the first Avengers movie. Oh hes a good guy? Well hes also a bad guy most of the time and has zero problems demonstrating this throughout the movie franchise, so why keep this highly traitorous shitfuck alive?

The audience loves him! Ever since Hulk had his way with Loki *Puny god* I think the audience craves more of that beat down and spit on the mostly bad guy
 
Upvote
19 (19 / 0)
I never understood why they didn't just execute Loki after the first Avengers movie. Oh hes a good guy? Well hes also a bad guy most of the time and has zero problems demonstrating this throughout the movie franchise, so why keep this highly traitorous shitfuck alive?

The audience loves him! Ever since Hulk had his way with Loki *Puny god* I think the audience craves more of that beat down and spit on the mostly bad guy
That's not too far off. After the positive feedback from him in The Avengers, the studio rewrote Thor: The Dark World to give him a bigger role (anybody remember that Malekith was supposed to be the villain of that movie?).

It's the same reason that nobody believed he was going to stay dead after Avengers: Infinity War (or at the end of The Dark World for that matter). He's too marketable.
 
Upvote
22 (22 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

graylshaped

Ars Legatus Legionis
61,707
Subscriptor++
I never understood why they didn't just execute Loki after the first Avengers movie. Oh hes a good guy? Well hes also a bad guy most of the time and has zero problems demonstrating this throughout the movie franchise, so why keep this highly traitorous shitfuck alive?

Fratricide usually is bad karma.
 
Upvote
17 (18 / -1)
I never understood why they didn't just execute Loki after the first Avengers movie. Oh hes a good guy? Well hes also a bad guy most of the time and has zero problems demonstrating this throughout the movie franchise, so why keep this highly traitorous shitfuck alive?

Violence is never the answer.

Well, unless the question is, "What is never the answer?"

Then, er...violence is the answer but wait, it can't be because it's never the answer!

*head asplode*
 
Upvote
25 (26 / -1)

graylshaped

Ars Legatus Legionis
61,707
Subscriptor++
I never understood why they didn't just execute Loki after the first Avengers movie. Oh hes a good guy? Well hes also a bad guy most of the time and has zero problems demonstrating this throughout the movie franchise, so why keep this highly traitorous shitfuck alive?

The audience loves him! Ever since Hulk had his way with Loki *Puny god* I think the audience craves more of that beat down and spit on the mostly bad guy
That's not too far off. After the positive feedback from him in The Avengers, the studio rewrote Thor: The Dark World to give him a bigger role (anybody remember that Malekith was supposed to be the villain of that movie?).

It's the same reason that nobody believed he was going to stay dead after Avengers: Infinity War (or at the end of The Dark World for that matter). He's too marketable.

I believe the Loki series had already been announced before the events of Infinity Wars showed his fate. Truth be told, I never thought he was actually dead. He was always three steps ahead, and I can't imagine he would have gone straight at Thanos without something up his sleeve.
 
Upvote
10 (10 / 0)

Zhenocnra

Smack-Fu Master, in training
75
"Smorgasbord" is right. My wife and I watched this trailer/teaser last night and, not knowing what or who the TVA are, were pretty confused by it all. It looked sort of like Quantum Leap, only with a Norse god in place of Sam and Owen Wilson playing Al.

Still, it's piqued our interest enough to check it out when the time comes.

Uh, well yeah. That's expected of WandaVision AND Loki's TV show.

"I don't think we should focus on Loki. That guy's brain is a bag full of cats. You can smell crazy on him" - Dr. Bruce Banner, "The Avengers"'

By nature you're not supposed to be able to "understand" him which extends to this trailer and hopefully the show. The overall theme of the trailer fits Loki and his persona. If anything, this is literally Loki in Wonderland. The Avenger's "Cheshire Cat" makes a cameo in the trailer anyway.

It's a trailer, not a synopsis. A trailer is a preview of things to come usually in order to pique interest. It's not supposed to be a summary.
 
Upvote
14 (14 / 0)

phoenix_rizzen

Ars Praefectus
4,556
Subscriptor
Let's be honest, I'd watch it just for Tom Hiddleston. If you haven't seen him in The Night Manager, try to track it down - excellent miniseries.

Tom Hiddleston and Hugh Laurie... you've piqued my interest. The trailer for it certainly looks good. Now to figure out where to watch it from ... or download it from ...

Edit: Looks like it's available to stream via Amazon Prime Video. Nice. Guess I have something to watch now ...
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

KWRussell

Ars Centurion
249
Subscriptor
Nah, I'm good. I was pretty done with the Marvel stuff after The Avengers back in like 2013.

Then why did you click on and then comment upon the article?
Oh no, someone with a differing opinion!

I personally would rather see a discussion involving multiple points of view, and not just a naval gazing fanboy circlejerk.

"I need to insert myself into this conversation just to point out that I don't give a damn about whatever it is you're talking about" is not a discussion. It's interrupting the discussion.
 
Upvote
62 (63 / -1)

graylshaped

Ars Legatus Legionis
61,707
Subscriptor++
Nah, I'm good. I was pretty done with the Marvel stuff after The Avengers back in like 2013.

Then why did you click on and then comment upon the article?
Oh no, someone with a differing opinion!

I personally would rather see a discussion involving multiple points of view, and not just a naval gazing fanboy circlejerk.

"I don't care" checks the "Doesn't Contribute" box fairly thoroughly. It fills it entirely with black ink, in fact.
 
Upvote
45 (47 / -2)
Nah, I'm good. I was pretty done with the Marvel stuff after The Avengers back in like 2013.

Then why did you click on and then comment upon the article?
Oh no, someone with a differing opinion!

I personally would rather see a discussion involving multiple points of view, and not just a naval gazing fanboy circlejerk.

"I quit caring about Marvel back in 2013" is an opinion, sure, but it doesn't add any value to the discussion. It's a throwaway comment that appears, on the face of it, to exist for the sake of being contrarian. Well within the OP's right to do that, but there shouldn't be any measure of surprise at the negative reaction to it, either.
 
Upvote
35 (37 / -2)

SwedBear

Seniorius Lurkius
23
Subscriptor++
Let's be honest, I'd watch it just for Tom Hiddleston. If you haven't seen him in The Night Manager, try to track it down - excellent miniseries.

I do like that Marvel seems to be expanding out of their main universe as it opens up a lot of options they can do without worrying about conflicting.

As long as they keep it so that you can watch most of it in isolation, and the connections are more backstory/side story, I'm good. Character cameos, unimportant "remember ____" lines, etc all make sense.

If it gets to the point that I have to watch all the TV shows in order to know what's happening in a movie or other show, it'll be a problem. I'm willing to admit that movies should be watched in order (usually), and that shared names in particular need to be watched as a series.

But if I'm sitting in a theater (maybe) and going "wait, when did that critical plot moment happen?" and find out it happened in a separate TV show, it starts to become a burden to keep up.

I used to watch Legends of Tomorrow and to some extend Flash and Supergirl but everytime they had their "crossovers" I got frustrated because suddenly I had to try to match up and find the relevant episode in Arrow, Flash, Supergirl etc so I could watch them in order and also catch up with everything. Which reminds me that I actually stopped watching legends due to a crossover that I needed to find all the episodes for ...

So yeah, please do not do to much crossovers that requiers you to watch every show to figure out what is happening.
 
Upvote
14 (14 / 0)

graylshaped

Ars Legatus Legionis
61,707
Subscriptor++
Let's be honest, I'd watch it just for Tom Hiddleston. If you haven't seen him in The Night Manager, try to track it down - excellent miniseries.

I do like that Marvel seems to be expanding out of their main universe as it opens up a lot of options they can do without worrying about conflicting.

As long as they keep it so that you can watch most of it in isolation, and the connections are more backstory/side story, I'm good. Character cameos, unimportant "remember ____" lines, etc all make sense.

If it gets to the point that I have to watch all the TV shows in order to know what's happening in a movie or other show, it'll be a problem. I'm willing to admit that movies should be watched in order (usually), and that shared names in particular need to be watched as a series.

But if I'm sitting in a theater (maybe) and going "wait, when did that critical plot moment happen?" and find out it happened in a separate TV show, it starts to become a burden to keep up.

I used to watch Legends of Tomorrow and to some extend Flash and Supergirl but everytime they had their "crossovers" I got frustrated because suddenly I had to try to match up and find the relevant episode in Arrow, Flash, Supergirl etc so I could watch them in order and also catch up with everything. Which reminds me that I actually stopped watching legends due to a crossover that I needed to find all the episodes for ...

So yeah, please do not do to much crossovers that requiers you to watch every show to figure out what is happening.


Crossovers? In the MCU?

Hmmmm.....
 
Upvote
6 (6 / 0)

S_T_R

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,773
I never understood why they didn't just execute Loki after the first Avengers movie. Oh hes a good guy? Well hes also a bad guy most of the time and has zero problems demonstrating this throughout the movie franchise, so why keep this highly traitorous shitfuck alive?

Why doesn't Thor, the largest Asgardian, simply not eat the punier gods?
 
Upvote
14 (14 / 0)

evan_s

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,415
Subscriptor
Let's be honest, I'd watch it just for Tom Hiddleston. If you haven't seen him in The Night Manager, try to track it down - excellent miniseries.

I do like that Marvel seems to be expanding out of their main universe as it opens up a lot of options they can do without worrying about conflicting.

As long as they keep it so that you can watch most of it in isolation, and the connections are more backstory/side story, I'm good. Character cameos, unimportant "remember ____" lines, etc all make sense.

If it gets to the point that I have to watch all the TV shows in order to know what's happening in a movie or other show, it'll be a problem. I'm willing to admit that movies should be watched in order (usually), and that shared names in particular need to be watched as a series.

But if I'm sitting in a theater (maybe) and going "wait, when did that critical plot moment happen?" and find out it happened in a separate TV show, it starts to become a burden to keep up.

I used to watch Legends of Tomorrow and to some extend Flash and Supergirl but everytime they had their "crossovers" I got frustrated because suddenly I had to try to match up and find the relevant episode in Arrow, Flash, Supergirl etc so I could watch them in order and also catch up with everything. Which reminds me that I actually stopped watching legends due to a crossover that I needed to find all the episodes for ...

So yeah, please do not do to much crossovers that requiers you to watch every show to figure out what is happening.

Yeah I was watching Arrow and Flash on Netflix and ran into that problem a bit. I got distracted by other things and haven't gotten back to them to even make it to legends of tomorrow. Seems like a great opportunity for Netflix to step up with something that helps you watch all the episodes in a connected universe in the proper order. Either cycling between them as needed or before the start of a crossover giving you a " You should catch up on Flash before you watch this episode of the Arrow" hint with a button to jump to your next episode of the Flash.

It was definitely annoying to start watching an episode and get some semi-spoiler in the opening intro before you even know what's happening.
 
Upvote
10 (10 / 0)