It is not "destroying" the richest man in the world in any way possible. Even without X payments, and other companies, he is still the richest man in the world. I suppose it is preventing him from being the first person worth $1 Trillion. Oh No!Though, Trump is right, it's destroying people. The CFPB is destroying Elon Musk.
It is when the president and his side kick are or plan to commit fraud.This is so tiring. So fraud detection and prevention is "political" now? For real?
Ugh
Lest we all forget Trump literally started his current presidency with <checks notes> a crypto rugpull.It is when the president and his side kick are or plan to commit fraud.
You forgot to mention, post the wrong thing on the site and your account gets suspended. And presumably with that, your ability to access your funds.There just isn't a demand for another payments app that's tied to that microblog site where people talk about wiping out all the trans people and whatnot.
Tap to pay? Though that's 20+ years old when Europeans started getting it.Serious question: what was the last "innovation" with money that wasn't a grift?
Not crypto, or tax shelters, or creative accounting where you simultaneously reap huge profits while posting huge offsetting losses, an actual no joke innovation.
I send my son rent money with Zelle, that's handy I guess?
It's really hilarious isn't it? The idea that you would even want to combine "the place I shit post and argue with people" with "the place that manages all my finances" just boggles my mind.You forgot to mention, post the wrong thing on the site and your account gets suspended. And presumably with that, your ability to access your funds.
Have you heard of Truth Social, created by the biggest lying sack of shit the world has ever seen?
'CFPB destroys people' is some lazy-ass 1984 shit. These clowns don't even try hard anymore because the gullible smoothbrains will eat it up as fact
I don't think people understand scale at all. A single billion of anything is....not really relatable. Its just a 1 with a b that we know is way bigger than a 1 with an m. Or 100 with an m. Sure, you can logic it out, but you can't really feel it, understand it.It is not "destroying" the richest man in the world in any way possible. Even without X payments, and other companies, he is still the richest man in the world. I suppose it is preventing him from being the first person worth $1 Trillion. Oh No!
I don't think people really understand the scale of his net worth in any way.
And the non-gullible will sit and do nothing about it.Con men doing con men shit. And the gullibles will cheer!
It's like if 4Chan announced that they are opening a bank. Actually, I'd probably trust 4Chan before I trusted X.It's really hilarious isn't it? The idea that you would even want to combine "the place I shit post and argue with people" with "the place that manages all my finances" just boggles my mind.
There are situations where you don’t want innovation.This seems to answer a question about exploring a method for offline payments (network is unavailable) ... this basically sounds like how some stored-value transit cards work where the readers on a bus/ferry aren't connected to the internet. The limitations here seem to be 5 offline transactions and ~300 USD (10 SEK = 0.98 USD) stored on the card, a payment terminal can only accept 12 payments and about 2000 USD. I would hesitate to call this innovative, as Suica/Mifare have been around for 20+ years.
Musk got his get out of jail card when he donated $250 million.
The alternative, of course, is that the 99.99% of Ars members who are not you are actually people who can reason and you are the toad-brained. But I don't expect that thought to cross your mind, given a line has such a low probability of touching a volume that small.-1. I forgot the comments regarding these kind of stories on Ars are pretty much just echo chambers and naval gazing.
Which is only ~0.06% of what his net worth was at the time.
That’s right, he bought a President for less than a tenth of a percent of his total wealth.
For comparison, if your net worth was $1,000, buying Trump would only cost you 60 cents.
Granted, Presidents are more expensive than SCOTUS justices (they only cost an RV), but still a good ROI.
It would certainly explain the "Sir" part.It makes sense when you realize that the people he was talking to were probably the executives of digital payments companies. He doesn't talk to normal people, he just talks at them.
This reminds me of the comments on Ars and other sites when Russia decided to start a little special operation in Ukraine. People were telling Russians to go out and protest and take down the regime.Can their intentions be ANY more out in the open? C'mon USians - make the hurting stop!
I never understood what we would actually gain by the e-krona in practice. Especially since Swish (a payment system from the Swedish banks) has removed the need for cash almost completely since you can send money to anyone with a phone number and a bank account through Swish. I haven't used cash for several years. Many smaller stores don't even take cash anymore, preferring bank cards or Swish.Since 2017 Sweden has been on a journey to convert the country to a digital e-krona currency. As I understand it, this is different than e-transactions in that the currency is state issued in digital form, and the digital currency can form the basis of exchange. As of 2024 the project has completed it's fourth phase which describes how the currency could launch in practice, following successful technical trials.
Part of what makes this potentially "innovative" is that it could function if other digital transactions systems based on fiat currency go down (like credit cards or banks) and it can wholly replace cash.
And if your net worth is $1M, i.e. you're someone who's already pretty well off, then the equivalent cost of buying Trump is about the price of an entry-level iPad...For comparison, if your net worth was $1,000, buying Trump would only cost you 60 cents.
Comments full of people with anonymous names typing from the comfort of their desk about "well if I was stuck on the space station I'd tell Trump to kiss my ass!"This reminds me of the comments on Ars and other sites when Russia decided to start a little special operation in Ukraine. People were telling Russians to go out and protest and take down the regime.
Easy to say from behind your computer.
Another viewpoint: https://reason.com/2025/01/27/abolish-the-cfpb/
My view is from someone with 17 years in the consumer debt collection industry.
The CFPB isn’t all bad - but it wields WAY too much unchecked power with next to no oversight.
Remove all medical debt from CBR and make it illegal to consider when making financial (loan, mortgage etc) decisions?
That makes no sense.
Sure, but after decades of hearing Americans boast about their guns and how they keep them to protect themselves from government tyranny, can you really blame people for being surprised at the lack of reaction against tyranny?Comments full of people with anonymous names typing from the comfort of their desk about "well if I was stuck on the space station I'd tell Trump to kiss my ass!"
Alright cool.
People trying to pay their mortgage/rent and raise their kids, the Hollywood characters never seem to have to worry about bills when they do the cool resistance montages.
Is there just this mindset among republicans that helping/protecting people hurts them subtly because it makes them gradually dependent on the help/protection?