It’s nice to see some movement on opening the superchargers again as this has been a long delay after Ford. Not likely to happen, but a calendar of some form for the next few manufacturers would be great. Volvo announced Q2 2024 last fall, but has since downgraded it to “soon.”
to connect the Tesla J3400 (originally NACS) plug
My back-of-napkin math puts it around 170k (excluding Volt).How many EVs has GM sold total in north america? Maybe 200k ?
(and are still on the road)
What percentage of those will be able to use nacs with an adapter?
Obviously, if Elon is slow-walking opening up the charging network to other OEM's, it will be hard to tell if it's a legit issue or just an excuse.You should probably forget about that. Since it depends on the burning garbage fire we call Tesla, its a miracle anyone at any of the car companies can get someone on the phone to deal with setting up car access.
The NYT ran this recently, which is a good read: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/27/business/energy-environment/tesla-electric-vehicle-charging.html
I am planning on bugging a bunch of OEMs in November to see what their collective excuses will be as they try and explain why their drivers still don't have access or adapters yet.
I believe NACS is the name Tesla called it when promoting it to be the new standard, before it became a formal standard. SAE J3400 is the name for the formalized standard.Maybe I misunderstand but shouldn't this be the other way around? "NACS (originally Tesla J3400)"
Tesla the company, separated from Elon, is actually pretty competent, and the Supercharging network is robust. Considering past legacy auto performance in the Adopting New Technology department, I'm more inclined to blame them.You should probably forget about that. Since it depends on the burning garbage fire we call Tesla, its a miracle anyone at any of the car companies can get someone on the phone to deal with setting up car access.
The NYT ran this recently, which is a good read: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/27/business/energy-environment/tesla-electric-vehicle-charging.html
I am planning on bugging a bunch of OEMs in November to see what their collective excuses will be as they try and explain why their drivers still don't have access or adapters yet.
A few weeks ago I downloaded the Tesla app and set my vehicle as a Chevy Bolt, and it didn't show any chargers near my location. I just checked again and it's showing several, so I believe that means the Tesla app can be used as well.Wait, I’d need to use GM’s app? I can’t just use the Tesla app?
No, J3400 is the SAE name for the actual standard. NACS is the Tesla name for it.Maybe I misunderstand but shouldn't this be the other way around? "NACS (originally Tesla J3400)"
From another article I read that Bolts will need a software update at the dealer. I haven't called a dealer to confirm and don't know if they will charge for the update. Seems like they might since they're charging for the adapter.Will this work with my 2017 Bolt? No adapters in the useless “MyChevrolet” app.
Thanks for the clarification! J3400 just rolls off the tongue, right? I'm pretty sure NACS will become the common name and hopefully at some point the plug becomes universal enough that the name entirely disappears.I believe NACS is the name Tesla called it when promoting it to be the new standard, before it became a formal standard. SAE J3400 is the name for the formalized standard.
It's like FireWire vs IEEE-1394. Both refer to the same communications protocol. Side note: I just realized how old I am by remembering that.
paid back, in full, years ago. Try harder.Since Tesla got tons of taxpayer welfare they should open chargers to all brands.
Obviously, if Elon is slow-walking opening up the charging network to other OEM's, it will be hard to tell if it's a legit issue or just an excuse.
I think that depends on the other brands and much as Tesla. It seems like Chevy dragged this out forever so they could make it work through their app, even though it works through the Tesla app just fine.Since Tesla got tons of taxpayer welfare they should open chargers to all brands.
If you could ask them about Hyundai, maybe prod them with a needle or three, and then respond personally to me, I would consider it a great favor.You should probably forget about that. Since it depends on the burning garbage fire we call Tesla, its a miracle anyone at any of the car companies can get someone on the phone to deal with setting up car access.
The NYT ran this recently, which is a good read: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/27/business/energy-environment/tesla-electric-vehicle-charging.html
I am planning on bugging a bunch of OEMs in November to see what their collective excuses will be as they try and explain why their drivers still don't have access or adapters yet.
The connector we use for AC charging is called J1772. The world didn't end because it didn't have a snazzy name. It doesn't need a name. People will call it "the charger" or "the plug" and that'll be the end of it. I'm sure there's an SAE standard for gasoline and diesel pump nozzles as well, but how often do you hear anyone referring to them by that name? Never.Thanks for the clarification! J3400 just rolls off the tongue, right? I'm pretty sure NACS will become the common name and hopefully at some point the plug becomes universal enough that the name entirely disappears.
HPIB vs. IEEE-488. I see your old and raise you 10 years, back before HP was a printer manufacturer. RPN FTWI believe NACS is the name Tesla called it when promoting it to be the new standard, before it became a formal standard. SAE J3400 is the name for the formalized standard.
It's like FireWire vs IEEE-1394. Both refer to the same communications protocol. Side note: I just realized how old I am by remembering that.
That can be true - and Elon also could react to some perceived slight somewhere and gum up the rollout for another company. (See Elon telling advertisers to "GFY"...)I think to attribute a purposeful intent here is giving him too much credit.
He's acting/reacting with no real direction at all, to the detriment of his own company (see: firing the very successful head [and many of her subordinates] of the division in charge of this very topic, superchargers).
I'd like to think that the risk of regulatory intervention might be enough to keep that from happening, but I know there's going to be a point where there just aren't enough of the unpopular cars left on the road to create enough consumer outrage to matter.I foresee future pain with needing a proprietary app unique to the vehicle to be able to charge.
"Sales sucked so we turned off the servers. Sorry about bricking your car."
$225 for something that has to be capable of carrying hundreds of Amps at hundreds of Volts is perfectly reasonable. This is not something you buy off of AliExpress for 90% off.As a Tesla owner, the $225 'adapter' reminds me of when Tesla made the decision to not include it with purchase of a Tesla. I guess we can thank Apple for that, right? And $225 for an adapter is nonsense. For that kind of money it better be moaning like a trashy wife or something.
Same thing happens with Tesla, even outside the app.I foresee future pain with needing a proprietary app unique to the vehicle to be able to charge.
"Sales sucked so we turned off the servers. Sorry about bricking your car."
There needs to be legislation and regulation to prevent this. Drivers should be able to fall back to paying at the charger.
SAE "J" standards are their motor vehicles standards. I'm unsure if the "3400" represents something or is just the standard number they are up to.Re: Naming
Can someone tell me what the name J3400 actually represents? Does the J mean something? Do the the numbers? Wasn't able to find this with a quick web search.
Nothing. It's just the number of the SAE standard that defines it. It's like a catalog number.Re: Naming
Can someone tell me what the name J3400 actually represents? Does the J mean something? Do the the numbers? Wasn't able to find this with a quick web search.
Tesla does have a first mover advantage. Their Supercharger network has been the vanguard of the EV transition, and the fact that it's opening to other makers via the new standard is huge.If Tesla is such a burning garbage fire, why did the entire industry trip over themselves to adopt NACS after Tesla made it available in late 2022?
The pain of using GM's app more or less completely offsets the convenience of having the supercharger network...Wait, I’d need to use GM’s app? I can’t just use the Tesla app?