Teen creates memecoin, dumps it, earns $50,000

Post content hidden for low score. Show…

SixDegrees

Ars Legatus Legionis
45,524
Subscriptor
Mental note: when emulating this scam, be sure to start coin account with one identity, then buy your initial coins using another, carefully shielded identity so your original persona can believably join in the wailing while your evil persona takes all the heat.
Note 2: Establish a third account. When rage-induced bidding spikes the price even more, cash in with this identity. Can use original identity to foment rage.
 
Upvote
66 (66 / 0)

daddyboomalati

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
141
Subscriptor
The whole crypto discussion(s) aside, know what your kids are doing on their computers! A coworker’s autism-spectrum kid was dealing in stolen Steam (etc.) accounts and getting paid in BTC when he was 12. Twelve. Then they got a knock on the door from the FBI, IIRC.

Take the time to engage your kids and learn what they’re up to.
 
Upvote
124 (126 / -2)

bradley13

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
197
Subscriptor
I honestly don't get the people who are mad at him. He created a memecoin on a site designed to push memecoins. He made no promise, not that anyone one a site like that should or would believe any promises anyway. He proved the truth of "a fool and his money are soon parted."

Good for the kid. I hope, though, that he learned a little bit about security. It shouldn't have been so easy to find his parents, phone number, etc..
 
Upvote
105 (112 / -7)
We are going to keep wasting money into this scam. That's going to show him.

I'm going to say, the only smart people here are the ones that created Pump.fun. And they should be checked be the FTC to check their business practices because they are making money from scams.
That form of revenge is only effective on people susceptible to FOMO. The kid has his $50K for practically no effort. He should focus on that and not the tens of million he "lost."
 
Upvote
64 (64 / 0)

bugsbony

Ars Scholae Palatinae
901
Suckers are born every day. I don't feel at all bad for the "investors". Mostly because they are not "Investors" at all but rather speculators. They deserve to be screwed over if they "invest" in "vehicles" such as Gen Z Quant.
It's something I hear a lot whenever this kind of scam happen. But, even if you don't care about dumb people getting scammed, you should care about who gets a lot of money. Scammers should not be rewarded. Money is power, this is how you end up with scammers being elected President.
 
Upvote
69 (78 / -9)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

Derecho Imminent

Ars Legatus Legionis
15,177
Subscriptor
Ethically dubious? It seems to me that his public demonstration of the idiocy of this whole thing is ethically on reasonably solid ground. I mean, code is law, right? I don't recall hearing anything about some unwritten code of honor being law as well...
No, but honor is ethics.
 
Upvote
-13 (2 / -15)

Daniel

Ars Praefectus
3,637
Subscriptor
On December 1, after a two-week hiatus, Biesk’s son returned to Pump.Fun to launch five new memecoins, apparently undeterred by the abuse. Disregarding the warnings built into the very names of some of the new coins—one was named test and another dontbuy—people bought in. Biesk’s son made another $5,000.

Haha, holy crap!
 
Upvote
79 (80 / -1)

ptmmac

Seniorius Lurkius
30
Either regulate crypto or ban it.
You can’t ban stupidity. You can’t even shame stupidity. There is a reason why we have regulations that make people liable for attempting to sell pyramid schemes. This is why crypto should be banned. China did it but we don’t seem to honest enough to do like wise. Maybe there is something wrong with allowing corporations and individuals to purchase government via the highest bidder.

See my first 2 statements above and the Supreme Court decision in Citizen's United. You can’t ban stupidity if you lack the moral understanding and will power to implement it in the highest court in the country. We don’t have that. It is taking time for all the dominos to fall but they are and will keep falling.
 
Upvote
64 (67 / -3)

hunting_for_p

Smack-Fu Master, in training
12
Subscriptor
I'm pretty sure the Sucker Coefficient has risen well above 1.0 since Barnum established it.

Given that there are around 39 million minutes in 75 years (an approximate lifespan), I think the coefficient is at least an order of magnitude off. In crypto alone a quick google search turned up estimates of 420-620 million global users. Add in other suckers (such as those of us who picked up VUL policies...) and there's a big adjustment needed.

This would put the floor around 'A sucker is born every 6 seconds' easily up to 'A sucker is born every second' which does have a nicer ring to it.
 
Upvote
23 (24 / -1)