I didn’t say it was illegal. (...) Samsung has half their work done by Google, and yet their phones are as expensive or more expensive than Apple’s! Thieves.
The Buds3 are an embarrassing copy. But part of the controversy around them is that Samsung abandoned their established stemless earbud style for them, so copied-Apple-like-they-always-do is false - for many years Samsung used their own design.Well there is nothing random here. They copied Apple like they always do. When they eventually introduce their AR headet it will feature a front facing glass panel just like the Vision Pro.
That sucks. I've been using a lot of mid-range Samsung stuff the past 5 years, not a single issue. If we form the average of our anecdata, they are probably doing alright.Lately? I have now avoided Samsung products for 15 years now. Every time I do get one, the QC is horrible and I have to deal with a problem that is uniquely Samsung.
Yah, never believe your lying eyes. Have a contrary example?Yes, you did, and now you did it again.
The Buds3 are an embarrassing copy. But part of the controversy around them is that Samsung abandoned their established stemless earbud style for them, so copied-Apple-like-they-always-do is false - for many years Samsung used their own design.
No. I didn’t.Yes, you did, and now you did it again.
You called them thieves for their behaviour. Theft is illegal. So yes, you called their behaviour illegal, twice.No. I didn’t.
It’s a hyperbole.You called them thieves for their behaviour. Theft is illegal. So yes, you called their behaviour illegal, twice.
What the actual f? Welcome to the ignore zone.Well, yeah. Considering plenty of women put large amounts of it in their breasts to (most of the time) no ill effects, silicone itself shouldn’t be the issue. The thought of it makes me miss my ex a bit, although she was a handful (hu hu) in other ways too.
...Yes, you did, and now you did it again.
Silicone is really just a category to begin with, with a few common polymers but a lot of possible ones.I’ve had a similar experience with my Jabras. Really worried I would tear the material getting the tips off the headphones, but the material just bounced back into place.
In spite of silicone materials tending to be advertised as just “silicone”, there are a variety of formulations, which can include non-silicone ingredients to fine-tune material characteristics. I guess how easily torn is one of those characteristics that can vary.
As an aside, the watch band my Garmin came with is silicone, and caused a rash. Pure silicone shouldn’t do that, but as I pointed out to my sister, at the very least they had to put in a dye, since silicone is not naturally forest green, and probably there were other non-silicone additives to get just the flexibility (and/or some other characteristic) they wanted. The replacement silicone band I bought hasn’t caused a rash, heavily supporting the idea that’s it wasn’t the silicone in the first band that was the problem.
You could argue that this is part of the problem.This seems like a weird mistake for a company that hasn't...exactly...started manufacturing consumer electronics yesterday to make.
Obviously even experience doesn't always save you; but it's not like this is some dude with a kickstarter and a dream taking his first steps into the grim horrible world of scaling up manufacturing. This is a company that has put a lot of assorted projects out the door(how much they do internally and how much they do by knowing how to keep pet ODMs and contract manufacturers in line, no idea; but either approach is a flavor of manufacturing experience).
It's not as though elastomeric silicones are some kind of novel, ill-characterized, material just out of the lab that nobody has ever handled before.
My two LG refrigerators were great. Except for the compressors, both of which failed in two years. The LG-authorized repairman refused to use the compressor intended for the refrigerator and demanded a better one for mine. He reconditions and donates failed LG refrigerators.I can’t speak to any of their other products but I’ve been very happy with my LG OLED TV. That’s been excellent.
It's always the personal attacks with you.You could argue that this is part of the problem.
Samsung produces what seems like thousands of skus which are variations of the same thing.
I cannot imagine that you have any depth of focus with such a scatterbrained approach.
Uh, what? 'My product was great, except for its core function and purpose'? And the repair guy recognised the shit component and refused to replace it with the same one... yeah, they sound great.My two LG refrigerators were great. Except for the compressors, both of which failed in two years. The LG-authorized repairman refused to use the compressor intended for the refrigerator and demanded a better one for mine. He reconditions and donates failed LG refrigerators.