RFK Jr. killed grants "with no warning or legally valid explanation," states say.
See full article...
See full article...
YesIs the picture in this article of a troll or gremlin in a suit?
Is the picture in this article of a troll or gremlin in a suit?
Totally fair point. I'm neither in healthcare nor government and didn't know what an ELC grant was until looking it up a few minutes ago.
Again, to be clear - my original comment had nothing to do with the lawsuit or its merits.
My point was that the headline starts "“Chaos” at state health agencies after US illegally axed grants," - yet Ars quoted no specifics on what the cuts were or what each side was saying about them. Everything was about unspecified "programs" and just quoted the impacted offical's statements that it's "Chaos" at face value.
But the moving fast is part of the process, because it means things have already happened before anyone (including the courts and congress, let alone the people) can react and push back. It’s a fait accompli, and (they are hoping) not undoable. And from their point of view, most if not all of the breaking thing is intentional, because they don’t like the things they are breaking.That part I don't mind.
It's the techbro "and breaking things" part that pisses me the fuck off.
If you really wanted to balance the budget, the first thing you’d cut is the defense budget, and you would raise, not cut, taxes on the rich and corporations.I might be able to get on board with some of these cuts if the goal was to balance the budget rather than to give it all to billionaires in the form of tax cuts. We're going to end up with fewer services and still have higher deficits.
I’ll add one of my favorites (by Learned Hand; 1872-1961):There’s a line of argument in the federalist papers that basically is as follows:
“we are going to assume that officers will follow the laws. Considering scenarios where the law is ignored is besides the point when discussing a constitution, because there is literally no law you can write that would protect against that scenario.”
The point is that, yes, democratic governments are run on an honor system. If you violate that honor system, then you violate the notion of a rule of law. And without a rule of law…
I'm at loss understanding how people support or al least accept the dismantling of their own social security net.
“Chaos” at state health agencies...
"Despite clear signs to the contrary, supporters of the Leopards Eating People's Faces Party remain fully confident that the freely roaming Leopards pose no threat to them or their families. One Florida Man interviewed by this outlet provided the following statement: 'nah bro I aks grok and it sed lepods only eat WOKE face lol they just here owning da libs lol'"."your desire to harm others outweighs your desire to help yourself."
Raising taxes on the rich has benefits beyond that, and I say that as someone who is in the top 3% or so.If you really wanted to balance the budget, the first thing you’d cut is the defense budget, and you would raise, not cut, taxes on the rich and corporations.
I'm at loss understanding how people support or al least accept the dismantling of their own social security net.
The sad irony here is that this is good for republicans. Because when times are tough and changing too fast and people feel in danger, they vote conservative. It's the common sense narrative that conservatives are the party of law and order and good financial times and general stability. Every part of that narrative is wrong, but it's still what the least politically aware think, so they'll vote conservative even harder as a result of the chaos and despair conservatives are sewing.
Look to the Wisconsin Supreme Court justice election today to see if I'm right. Despite being a purple state and one option being terrible and the current political climate, I still expect a landslide victory for conservatives.
Totally fair point. I'm neither in healthcare nor government and didn't know what an ELC grant was until looking it up a few minutes ago.
The chaos is spreading internationally. The current administration's funding cuts have hit long-running international collaborations in health, the environment and social sciences. In particular, Australian universities work closely with the US on cancer research, with hundreds of jointly-funded projects being established over the past decade. This is part of the almost a thousand joint research projects overall.
This has generally been a win/win for all involved, with the US gaining access to leading researchers and top-quality labs, all subsidized by the Australian government and for a fraction of the normal cost, and Australian researchers gaining access to a research pool that is larger than exists locally.
However many of these projects have received demands to fill in questionnaires to ensure they contain no "DEI, climate or environmental justice" content, and many have had funding suddenly suspended while they are assessed for content that may promote "Marxist equity, transgenderism, and green new deal social engineering policies". The funding cuts may be due to something as simple as having a verboten word such as "women", "climate", "equality" or "environment" in their project descriptions.
This is obviously causing chaos, and universities are racing to switch to working with European partners instead, with a big push under-way for Australia to join Horizon Europe and quickly establish joint-projects there, rather than relying on an unstable research partner.
I was always kind of envy of the USA because they had a constitution that stood the test of time, while here in Europe these things seem to change every few decades.There’s a line of argument in the federalist papers that basically is as follows:
“we are going to assume that officers will follow the laws. Considering scenarios where the law is ignored is besides the point when discussing a constitution, because there is literally no law you can write that would protect against that scenario.”
The point is that, yes, democratic governments are run on an honor system. If you violate that honor system, then you violate the notion of a rule of law. And without a rule of law…
Myeah, even if Trump keels over from one burger too many tomorrow and the US citizenry mans up and exiles every conservative into the Ozark foothills the week after, the damage has been done. The landslide is in motion and will hit rock bottom before cleanup can begin.
Only in the sense that predicting rain in the future is prescient. This is a pattern societies have repeated over and over, for thousands of years. The stupid, incompetent, greedy, and corrupt naturally rise to the top. And once they get there, their destructive nature runs its course. That it's happening to the US was never a question of 'if' but a question of 'when.' And the moment the US elected Trump the first time, the 'when' became "Very soon."
even if justice system does what it should what stops orange muppet to just issue pardons like for milton?Illegal only matters if the justice system can compel obedience to the law.
At this point, that is in doubt here in the US.
I assume these are mostly red states whose leadership know that they are not allowed to say or do anything that contravenes the will of the Great Orange Clown. If they do they will be made to suffer, (probably financially which is what's most important to them).What's going on in the 23 states that did not join the lawsuit?
I think it's pretty safe at this point to assume that any response from any office or department infiltrated by DOGE will just be a long string of them. Possibly followed up with [$][$][eggplant][US flag][explosion][fistbump][cry-laugh][$][$] , depending on which insufferable child got Social Media duty.Did the poop emoji already arrive?
He has already killed a lot of people. He is now moving into the big leagues and trying to outdo Felon45's COVID response disaster. The dead brain worm has been doing his driving, even before getting into that rotting roadkill he ate.Robert F. Kennedy Jr. should be in jail. Everything he does is illegal and dangerous. It is going to kill a lot of people.
Same reason that tariffs aren’t a tax. Dear leader said so.I'm at loss understanding how people support or al least accept the dismantling of their own social security net.
That's 50 measles clinics and 21 health care workers who won't report any measles cases, or complications from measles, or deaths from measles.Here's at least one specific for you: TX just shut down about about 50 measles clinics and laid off 21 front-line health care workers.
Wait for it .. there's going to be A LOT more of this.
I'd argue it should be the other way around. If someone is asking for a check, they should be able to make the case for why the expense is justified.
Possibly one of his own kids that fell out of line?It would not be any weirder if he ran around with a literal ax, murdering people; I guess I don't know that he didn't, it's 2025 so fuck it I guess, all bets are off. Musk was waving an actual chainsaw in his little bit the other day. It's plausible he went straight backstage and cut an orphan in half for fun.
Lack of critical thinking ability. It's that simple.I'm at loss understanding how people support or al least accept the dismantling of their own social security net.
There must be a reason he keeps arguing that breeders need to breed more.Possibly one of his own kids that fell out of line?
Got a non-paywalled link for us there fella?Meanwhile, Secretary Brainworm is busy firing 10,000 HHS staffers, including a bunch of very very qualified and able senior personnel at the CDC. And, just in case those fired workers have any questions, they can contact a particular person in the department.
Via seance. Because she's dead.
I vaguely remember from one of my appointments, that yearly reviews were supposed to protect you against such sudden shifts in management - i.e. If I have 5 years of "meets or exceeds" , wheres the cause?Dr. Richard Youle was fired today from NIH. He won the Breakthrough Prize 4 years ago for his gains battling Parkinson's Disease.
Don't lose sight of what's happening here. He wasn't laid off. His unit wasn't discontinued because Congress cut funding (Congress hasn't done that). He was fired for cause, which is the only tool the administration has with all of these firings. Weirdly, everyone in his unit was incompetent, as was everyone who was working on infant mortality who were fired today as well. Every single one of them.
If the federal government can summarily fire any worker regardless of whether Congress wants that agency to exist or not, then you in the private sector have zero job security. If women can be fired just because they're women or people of color can be fired just because they're people of color, you can be fired for who you are married to, whether you have a gay kid, who you vote for, etc. That's the stated goal here.
They're being fired for "poor performance" which makes it more difficult to get unemployment benefits. Basically a stacked "fuck you."I vaguely remember from one of my appointments, that yearly reviews were supposed to protect you against such sudden shifts in management - i.e. If I have 5 years of "meets or exceeds" , wheres the cause?
Is this sort of thing and issue in these positions?
This is EXACTLY what I am wasting my time telling fools that think Trump is better than Brandon mentality. I get not agreeing with some Dem policies as that is what voting was for. But I also don't get the morons that just believe news sources that are on social media that never existed before! Take that Joe Rogan idiot..he was some actor turned marketing-podcast-vj pusher. He's just a more pleasant Alex Jones. And fool Bros follow like hooker with fishnets.This is not move fast and break things. This is billionaires stealing from you - the services you've paid for, and if you don't want to die you're going to have to pay them because they are going to privatize everything.
Yes, but did they see that on Faux News, and if they did was it broadcast unedited?Don't let any Trump voter tell you they didn't vote for this. From Trump's Madison Square Garden rally:
"Donald Trump Vows to Let Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ‘Go Wild on Health’ If Elected"
https://www.wired.com/story/donald-trump-robert-f-kennedy-jr-rfk-rally-go-wild-on-health-antivax/
I'm at loss understanding how people support or al least accept the dismantling of their own social security net.