OnePlus 12 gets $800 US release along with the interesting $500 OnePlus 12R

DNA_Doc

Ars Scholae Palatinae
718
I have a Canon R6 and a fair amount of L series lenses (my wife is a photographer), but I take 90% of my personal photos with my Pixel 6. I only have the camera on me when I'm doing shoots. The phone is on me all the time. Even the smallest mirrorless camera won't fit in your pocket.

The other problem is that you have to know what you're doing to use the R6 well. The R6 can definitely beat the Pixel with proper editing, but most people can't or won't do that. The auto mode on the R6 is ok, but if you just want to point and shoot, the Pixel usually does a better job.
Similarly, I've got multiple full-frame Canon bodies, bags full of fast primes and L zooms, but these almost never come out anymore unless I'm being paid to shoot something. But I still carry around a Sony RX100 iii, which is, quite frankly, an amazing camera that does fit in a pocket and is worlds better as a versatile photographic tool than even the best smartphone cameras I've used (my daily right now is most often a Samsung S23U, which is generally considered to be top-tier when it comes to its cameras).
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

poochyena

Ars Scholae Palatinae
3,296
Subscriptor++
How do you turn OFF the autofocus?

Autofocus on my smartphone used to be fine, but a couple of years ago it stopped working. I could see it actually go INTO focus, but then it would back of a couple of steps back into unfocused. So it CAN focus, it just refuses to. I have tried several camera apps, none support turning off autofucos and focusing manually.
same exact thing here. It'll focus, and then decide, nah, that bunny over there is definitely suppose to look blurry.
I have a manual adjustment button on my default camera app. I tap it and it lets me manually change focus and other settings. For some reason I can't take a screenshot of my camera app.

but I take 90% of my personal photos with my Pixel 6.
yea, but like, the image quality doesn't matter all that much on personal photos. Its more about either quickly showing someone something (I'm at the store, which one of these do you want?) or to save a memory, like photos at a vacation spot.
There is a point where image quality fulfills those needs perfectly fine, and higher resolution just doesn't really matter.
Here is are photos I took in 2016 with a $60 phone
cookies.jpg 0224171443b.jpg
They look fine! Yes, low light photos were much worse back then, but in half decent lighting, the photos looked perfectly fine.
The question I have is; at what point does improved quality no longer have meaningful impact for you? In my view, unless you have a photography hobby or job, then I see no real improvement in usefulness in a $60 phone camera vs a $800+ phone camera.
You should really read into what computational photography can do. Smartphones can do things that mirrorless cameras can't due to their advanced processing algorithms when matched with powerful hardware.
meh. I hate some of the face smoothing and such. It makes people look weird. I do somewhat agree though, but in some ways its good, but in some ways its bad. I feel kinda 50/50 about it.
 
Upvote
0 (1 / -1)
I have a Canon R6 and a fair amount of L series lenses (my wife is a photographer), but I take 90% of my personal photos with my Pixel 6. I only have the camera on me when I'm doing shoots. The phone is on me all the time. Even the smallest mirrorless camera won't fit in your pocket.

The other problem is that you have to know what you're doing to use the R6 well. The R6 can definitely beat the Pixel with proper editing, but most people can't or won't do that. The auto mode on the R6 is ok, but if you just want to point and shoot, the Pixel usually does a better job.
Our family has been in the photo business for 3 generations. I learned pretty quickly that taking pictures on vacation when you want both the subject (kids, significant others) and the background in focus works a lot better with a phone camera than a full frame DSLR. The smaller phone camera sensors have much larger depth of field. Often times I'll have the camera on my shoulder and will still pull out the phone to take the picture.
 
Upvote
2 (3 / -1)

robrob

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,606
Subscriptor
The 12R sounds weak compared to for example Samsung's A54 5G ($400, 4 OS upgrades, microSD card slot so you can add +512 GB for $40).

The A54 is weak compared to just buying an A53, if you can still find one on sale. The hardware is basically the same (same GPU, moved two smaller cores to bigger ones) and all you lose is one OS upgrade.

The difference in hardware is truly staggering though when you compare to something like the 12R. I recently went looking for a phone to do some emulation and gaming on, first thought was a midrange phone. But the difference in raw GPU power is something like 5-10 times between a flagship and a midrange, sometimes more. We're talking more than the difference between a 4060 and a 4090.

I ended up with a $US200 Snapdragon 888+ based phone with an OLED screen. The lack of OS upgrades sucks but it's for playing games at home so I'm not too fussed.
 
Upvote
2 (3 / -1)
I don't understand the point of these $800+ phones. Realistically, what can these phones do better than a ~$400 phone? If photograhy matters a lot for you, why not get a cheap phone and a standalone camera? A sony mirrorless camera is as simple to use as a phone camera and is lightweight enough to carry around anywhere in a small bag.

The dumbest part about these expensive phones is that most people are just uploading the photos to instagram, which cuts the imagine quality by 1/10th.
Agree! I've been shooting pictures since the late 70's. Film, then switched to d-slr. Yeah, the best camera is the one you have with you when you want to take a photo, but, if I'm going out to PURPOSELY take photos, I'm sure not going to count on a super tiny smartphone camera sensor. I'll take my backpack with my camera, lenses etc.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

llewyn

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
125
I don't understand the point of these $800+ phones. Realistically, what can these phones do better than a ~$400 phone? If photograhy matters a lot for you, why not get a cheap phone and a standalone camera? A sony mirrorless camera is as simple to use as a phone camera and is lightweight enough to carry around anywhere in a small bag.

The dumbest part about these expensive phones is that most people are just uploading the photos to instagram, which cuts the imagine quality by 1/10th.
I mean it is called an soc, perhaps you've heard of it?
 
Upvote
-4 (0 / -4)
That's a reach. Large, standalone cameras have objectively better image quality when used by a professional who'd know what they're doing. Smartphones cater to a much different market looking for easy capture and quick results. It's mind boggling how advanced those results have been, but ridiculing standalone cameras for not having "technology" misses the most important innovations companies like Sony have been doing over the past five years. It's just that none of them cater to the point-and-shoot market because there's no demand for it. They could make such a device if they really pushed for it, but that would just rather be a large computer that happens to have an imaging sensor on board.
Sony makes phones, though. If they could build a cutting-edge "quick results" stack they absolutely would. All you need to do to see that they can't keep up is look at a comparison between Sony phone cameras and iPhones or especially Pixels. The pixels usually use Sony-manufactured sensors--worse ones than the Sony flagship phones, even--but the pictures are visibly better because Sony doesn't have that kind of in-house expertise.
 
Upvote
-3 (1 / -4)
Sony makes phones, though. If they could build a cutting-edge "quick results" stack they absolutely would. All you need to do to see that they can't keep up is look at a comparison between Sony phone cameras and iPhones or especially Pixels. The pixels usually use Sony-manufactured sensors--worse ones than the Sony flagship phones, even--but the pictures are visibly better because Sony doesn't have that kind of in-house expertise.
lmao .
sony does have the in house expert.
but it used else where that makes far more money for them.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

unshavenyak

Ars Scholae Palatinae
813
You should really read into what computational photography can do. Smartphones can do things that mirrorless cameras can't due to their advanced processing algorithms when matched with powerful hardware.



Hence, smartphone photos look much better out of the camera than dedicated mirrorless cameras that require substantial postprocessing to look good. For instagram uploads, it's the overall dynamic range, color, tone, and local contrast that looks pleasing to the eyes. The computational photography methods have these down well. If you're viewing the photos on a huge print or a large 4K display, then that's when the dedicated camera would have an advantage. Very few people are going to be in the latter group.
? My GFX 100S can easily exposure bracket and stack. My OM-1 has computational features that phones don’t (LiveND64, LiveComposite, in camera macro focus stacking, HHHR, pre-burst, etc). If your camera can’t do things your phone can, you bought the wrong camera. Post processing is trivial with modern software. DxO has great presets for most use cases.

Where the phone wins is workflow. It’s so much easier to shoot and directly upload to your platform of choice with a phone.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
2 (3 / -1)

unshavenyak

Ars Scholae Palatinae
813
Similarly, I've got multiple full-frame Canon bodies, bags full of fast primes and L zooms, but these almost never come out anymore unless I'm being paid to shoot something. But I still carry around a Sony RX100 iii, which is, quite frankly, an amazing camera that does fit in a pocket and is worlds better as a versatile photographic tool than even the best smartphone cameras I've used (my daily right now is most often a Samsung S23U, which is generally considered to be top-tier when it comes to its cameras).
Do people really find carrying a camera such a chore? I have a 7 L Wotancraft that goes with me everywhere (when not at work). My GFX 100S, 35-70 and EF 35 f2 IS on an adapter are almost always in the bag. The bag also has my Kobo Clara, sunglasses, wallet, keys, facial tissue, tide 2 go, reusable shopping bag, and other miscellaneous things.
 
Upvote
-3 (0 / -3)

unshavenyak

Ars Scholae Palatinae
813
lmao .
sony does have the in house expert.
but it used else where that makes far more money for them.
Yeah, it’s absurd to assert that the largest photographic semiconductor company with a camera that has a global shutter and the most advanced autofocus on the planet doesn’t have the in-house expertise. Sony doesn’t spend money on their Xperia software because, they quite frankly, don’t care.
 
Upvote
2 (3 / -1)
Our family has been in the photo business for 3 generations. I learned pretty quickly that taking pictures on vacation when you want both the subject (kids, significant others) and the background in focus works a lot better with a phone camera than a full frame DSLR. The smaller phone camera sensors have much larger depth of field. Often times I'll have the camera on my shoulder and will still pull out the phone to take the picture.
Pulling out a mirrorless camera will mark you out as a tourist whereas a phone snapper could be a visitor or a local who's just admiring the light. I've got mirrorless bodies and DSLRs in a dry box - I bring them out once a year for special occasions but almost all my pictures are taken on smartphones now.

I consider my Nokia 808 to have the best smartphone camera still. The optics, massive sensor and image processing gave it phenomenal detail but the lack of dynamic range is a big letdown. For me, the latest iPhone Pro models or Samsung S23 Ultra beats the 808 but it's taken twelve years to get this far.
 
Upvote
-3 (0 / -3)

unshavenyak

Ars Scholae Palatinae
813
Pulling out a mirrorless camera will mark you out as a tourist whereas a phone snapper could be a visitor or a local who's just admiring the light. I've got mirrorless bodies and DSLRs in a dry box - I bring them out once a year for special occasions but almost all my pictures are taken on smartphones now.

I consider my Nokia 808 to have the best smartphone camera still. The optics, massive sensor and image processing gave it phenomenal detail but the lack of dynamic range is a big letdown. For me, the latest iPhone Pro models or Samsung S23 Ultra beats the 808 but it's taken twelve years to get this far.
...or...your'e just a photographer. I've carried a camera with me since 2007. I enjoy photography and it's something that is always on me. Sometimes it's tiny like the Panasonic GM5 or GR IIIx. Sometimes it's bigger like the GFX 100S or Pixii. However, I always have one with me and likely will until I die.
 
Upvote
2 (3 / -1)
Wait, hold the phone — how much ram? 12 GB to start, a 16 GB upgrade, and 24 GB for the top of the line model? This is not a phone spec I've paid attention to lately, and these amounts sound absurd. Surely running Genshin Impact inside of WeChat isn't this costly? I know it's stupid that a Macbook Air still starts with 8 GB ram, and I regret my choice every day. But I still expect this laptop will run lots of fairly inefficient programs at the same time for many years to come. A Samsung S24 Ultra has "only" 12 GB ram and it can run Dex, a PS5 has 16 GB.
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)

unshavenyak

Ars Scholae Palatinae
813
Wait, hold the phone — how much ram? 12 GB to start, a 16 GB upgrade, and 24 GB for the top of the line model? This is not a phone spec I've paid attention to lately, and these amounts sound absurd. Surely running Genshin Impact inside of WeChat isn't this costly? I know it's stupid that a Macbook Air still starts with 8 GB ram, and I regret my choice every day. But I still expect this laptop will run lots of fairly inefficient programs at the same time for many years to come. A Samsung S24 Ultra has "only" 12 GB ram and it can run Dex, a PS5 has 16 GB.
RAM is cheap. Why complain?
 
Upvote
-2 (0 / -2)

ArsLoginName

Smack-Fu Master, in training
92
Wait, hold the phone — how much ram? 12 GB to start, a 16 GB upgrade, and 24 GB for the top of the line model? This is not a phone spec I've paid attention to lately, and these amounts sound absurd. Surely running Genshin Impact inside of WeChat isn't this costly? I know it's stupid that a Macbook Air still starts with 8 GB ram, and I regret my choice every day. But I still expect this laptop will run lots of fairly inefficient programs at the same time for many years to come. A Samsung S24 Ultra has "only" 12 GB ram and it can run Dex, a PS5 has 16 GB.
Android phones have been creeping the RAM up for years. Even an LG G8 from 2019 with a Snapdragon 855 had 6 GB/128 GB as a standard configuration. Almost all Android with Snapdragon 865 came with 8 GB standard (so 2020 flagships). Apple has been and continues to be the only company who skimps on RAM for $1k+ devices.

Edit: Add: So iPhone 14 Pro has same quantity of RAM as 2019 Android SD 855 and iPhone 15 Pro has same quantity as 2020 SD865 based phones. Obviously the iPhones have newer faster LPDDR5x compared to the LPDDR4 from back then. But the capacity is the same.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
1 (2 / -1)

Lutris

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
152
Sometimes, I wash my IP68 phone in the sink like it's a dirty dish!

Small warning there, don't use soapy water. I learned that the hard way. There are ingress points even in an ip68 phone to allow air pressure to equalize. That's fine with water's high surface tension, but cut that with soap and it can get in. Learned that the hard way when I noticed some moisture on my camera lens and ended up taking the phone apart to dry it.
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)
RAM is cheap. Why complain?
I'm not complaining, I'm just shocked! DRAM prices have been going up lately. Teslas have 8–20 GB, and that's so you can have the car sort of drive itself while you play Genshin Impact on the infotainment! I want to know what you can do on a phone that could use 24 GB of ram! (Exclamation points are cheap, and it's still possible to have too many of them!)
 
Upvote
6 (6 / 0)

peachpuff

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,209
During launch the galaxy phones are really cheap, i got my s24 256gb for $500 cad. There was an $135 educational discount that anyone can sign up for, $100 voucher from Samsung if you signed up a month before launch and a $450 trade in bonus is you traded in a galaxy s6 and up phone in any condition. I had an old s8 with a ballooned battery i traded in.
You just can't beat these Samsung deals. Even Apple has nothing like this let alone oneplus.
 
Upvote
-1 (1 / -2)
Wait, hold the phone — how much ram? 12 GB to start, a 16 GB upgrade, and 24 GB for the top of the line model? This is not a phone spec I've paid attention to lately, and these amounts sound absurd. Surely running Genshin Impact inside of WeChat isn't this costly? I know it's stupid that a Macbook Air still starts with 8 GB ram, and I regret my choice every day. But I still expect this laptop will run lots of fairly inefficient programs at the same time for many years to come. A Samsung S24 Ultra has "only" 12 GB ram and it can run Dex, a PS5 has 16 GB.
That phone had enough RAM to run a lightly quantized large language model with 13 or 20 billion parameters.

Are RAM modules on mainboards still a thing on flagship phones or is RAM built into the chip package like with Apple's M chips?
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)
Similarly, I've got multiple full-frame Canon bodies, bags full of fast primes and L zooms, but these almost never come out anymore unless I'm being paid to shoot something. But I still carry around a Sony RX100 iii, which is, quite frankly, an amazing camera that does fit in a pocket and is worlds better as a versatile photographic tool than even the best smartphone cameras I've used (my daily right now is most often a Samsung S23U, which is generally considered to be top-tier when it comes to its cameras).
I bought my wife a similar camera. $1200 point and shoot Sony (can't remember which model, it was 5 years ago) with optical zoom. It's either in her purse or clipped to her pant loop, so she has it pretty much all the time. It's great and has been used a lot over the years.

While having a phone camera is better than nothing, I have a Pixel 6 and I hate that I can't adjust any settings and frankly almost none of the pictures come out looking like real life. Over saturated (not as bad as iPhone but still..) and the light and colors are all wrong pretty much all the time. It's fine for taking a quick snap of a steak to send to friends but it's not even close to being an accurate representation. It's what Google thinks you want your picture to look like, not what it actually looks like. Makes me miss my Nokia win phone. My OnePlus (until ATT basically bricked it) had a much more realistic camera and I could adjust settings to get things at least somewhat close to what it looked like in real life. MP isn't everything.
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)
Yeah, it’s absurd to assert that the largest photographic semiconductor company with a camera that has a global shutter and the most advanced autofocus on the planet doesn’t have the in-house expertise. Sony doesn’t spend money on their Xperia software because, they quite frankly, don’t care.
correct. it one of those. are phone sell well in this 1 area. not any where else anymore. their a reason wht their line of phones dont sell well in most countries
 
Upvote
-1 (0 / -1)

unshavenyak

Ars Scholae Palatinae
813
correct. it one of those. are phone sell well in this 1 area. not any where else anymore. their a reason wht their line of phones dont sell well in most countries
Sony makes phones for the same reason that Microsoft makes Surface devices: they want a technical showcase for other OEMs. Sony doesn't make the Xperia Pro-I to challenge the big boys of the phone world. They make it so they can point at it and say "see that kick ass sensor tech that you could have?" and hope Apple or Samsung put in an order for a couple million sensors.
 
Upvote
-1 (0 / -1)

unshavenyak

Ars Scholae Palatinae
813
RAM uses battery life.
Probably not by an appreciable amount. I think it was Crucial who stated that going from 8 GB to 16 GB of RAM was an additional few watts of consumption under load and memory is ~5% of total phone power draw at any point in time. Most of the consumption is going to be from the memory controller anyways. Given how much better iOS is with memory management, I'd happily pay the 1% or whatever battery life penalty for a better user experience.
 
Upvote
-1 (0 / -1)
How are the OnePlus phones overall for photos? Google, Samsung, and Apple are all at the point where their computational photography is advanced enough that they can produce miracles. Is OnePlus in the same league or are they a few steps behind like Motorola and the other B-tier Android OEM's?

They're a tier behind.
 
Upvote
-1 (0 / -1)
I don't understand the point of these $800+ phones. Realistically, what can these phones do better than a ~$400 phone? If photograhy matters a lot for you, why not get a cheap phone and a standalone camera? A sony mirrorless camera is as simple to use as a phone camera and is lightweight enough to carry around anywhere in a small bag.

The dumbest part about these expensive phones is that most people are just uploading the photos to instagram, which cuts the imagine quality by 1/10th.

I use my 23 Ultra as my primary camera. It takes excellent photos of my kids etc. I then use those photos to purchase physical prints from the google photos store, all on the same device. I never use instagram.

It's also faster than a mid tier phone with better performance. Which means you can keep it longer.

It has a better display, easier to use in bright lights and easier on the eyes

It supports Wifi 6E (and technically 7 also)

It has Dex. which I use from time to time.

It's worth paying extra for that for my use case.
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)

misirlou

Seniorius Lurkius
18
Subscriptor
The smaller size is a plus, not a downside. Still pretty huge. Anybody know of a decent midrange phone in the 5.5-6" range?

Double rec for the comment about wanting more reasonably sized phones. Although my case, I finally broke down and moved to Apple because I wanted premium cameras (including telephoto) in a normal sized phone. My iPhone 14 is the same body size as my prior Pixel 5, which was my best Android phone with good features albeit lacking telephoto and even with Google camera wizardry struggled to match just having better sensors and bigger lenses (although maybe the latest Pixel phones remedy that albeit with only a large body size for the telephoto lens).
 
Upvote
-1 (0 / -1)

Pantufla

Ars Centurion
292
Subscriptor
In the past (back old days of OnePlus 6) it was possible to buy a Oneplus in China and use it with International OxygenOS without any restrictions or need to unlock (in contrast to Xiaomi that requires unlocking) . Oneplus 11 introduced regions, effectively preventing you from buying a phone in China and using it abroad. Does anyone know if Oneplus 12 will keep this region lock?
I personally refuse to pay a premium when buying a phone overseas just because they can. If they want to earn more money, they should do it the other way around: offer the 1TB version only overseas and charge a premium for it. But the way they do it, I'll vote with my wallet.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

dg33k

Seniorius Lurkius
23
How are the OnePlus phones overall for photos? Google, Samsung, and Apple are all at the point where their computational photography is advanced enough that they can produce miracles. Is OnePlus in the same league or are they a few steps behind like Motorola and the other B-tier Android OEM's?
I owned 2 OnePlus phones in the past and their image processing is simply sub-par. It is servicable for daytime photos that you'd share over social media but definitely not for creating memories. The low light photography is simply abysmal and they are well behind in computational photography. You'd find images being shared that seem to look good, but you find out how poor it is when you take it alongside an iPhone or Pixel.

OnePlus established its base by catering to the spec-obsessed market in Asia, especially China and India. This includes consumers who only purchase the device because it has a SD 8 Gen 3 or xx GB RAM with no consideration of the OS, support, privacy, image processing. It might end up doing better in these markets, especially with Samsung going for Exynos in the Asian markets with the S24.
 
Upvote
0 (1 / -1)