Similarly, I've got multiple full-frame Canon bodies, bags full of fast primes and L zooms, but these almost never come out anymore unless I'm being paid to shoot something. But I still carry around a Sony RX100 iii, which is, quite frankly, an amazing camera that does fit in a pocket and is worlds better as a versatile photographic tool than even the best smartphone cameras I've used (my daily right now is most often a Samsung S23U, which is generally considered to be top-tier when it comes to its cameras).I have a Canon R6 and a fair amount of L series lenses (my wife is a photographer), but I take 90% of my personal photos with my Pixel 6. I only have the camera on me when I'm doing shoots. The phone is on me all the time. Even the smallest mirrorless camera won't fit in your pocket.
The other problem is that you have to know what you're doing to use the R6 well. The R6 can definitely beat the Pixel with proper editing, but most people can't or won't do that. The auto mode on the R6 is ok, but if you just want to point and shoot, the Pixel usually does a better job.
same exact thing here. It'll focus, and then decide, nah, that bunny over there is definitely suppose to look blurry.How do you turn OFF the autofocus?
Autofocus on my smartphone used to be fine, but a couple of years ago it stopped working. I could see it actually go INTO focus, but then it would back of a couple of steps back into unfocused. So it CAN focus, it just refuses to. I have tried several camera apps, none support turning off autofucos and focusing manually.
yea, but like, the image quality doesn't matter all that much on personal photos. Its more about either quickly showing someone something (I'm at the store, which one of these do you want?) or to save a memory, like photos at a vacation spot.but I take 90% of my personal photos with my Pixel 6.
meh. I hate some of the face smoothing and such. It makes people look weird. I do somewhat agree though, but in some ways its good, but in some ways its bad. I feel kinda 50/50 about it.You should really read into what computational photography can do. Smartphones can do things that mirrorless cameras can't due to their advanced processing algorithms when matched with powerful hardware.
Our family has been in the photo business for 3 generations. I learned pretty quickly that taking pictures on vacation when you want both the subject (kids, significant others) and the background in focus works a lot better with a phone camera than a full frame DSLR. The smaller phone camera sensors have much larger depth of field. Often times I'll have the camera on my shoulder and will still pull out the phone to take the picture.I have a Canon R6 and a fair amount of L series lenses (my wife is a photographer), but I take 90% of my personal photos with my Pixel 6. I only have the camera on me when I'm doing shoots. The phone is on me all the time. Even the smallest mirrorless camera won't fit in your pocket.
The other problem is that you have to know what you're doing to use the R6 well. The R6 can definitely beat the Pixel with proper editing, but most people can't or won't do that. The auto mode on the R6 is ok, but if you just want to point and shoot, the Pixel usually does a better job.
The 12R sounds weak compared to for example Samsung's A54 5G ($400, 4 OS upgrades, microSD card slot so you can add +512 GB for $40).
Agree! I've been shooting pictures since the late 70's. Film, then switched to d-slr. Yeah, the best camera is the one you have with you when you want to take a photo, but, if I'm going out to PURPOSELY take photos, I'm sure not going to count on a super tiny smartphone camera sensor. I'll take my backpack with my camera, lenses etc.I don't understand the point of these $800+ phones. Realistically, what can these phones do better than a ~$400 phone? If photograhy matters a lot for you, why not get a cheap phone and a standalone camera? A sony mirrorless camera is as simple to use as a phone camera and is lightweight enough to carry around anywhere in a small bag.
The dumbest part about these expensive phones is that most people are just uploading the photos to instagram, which cuts the imagine quality by 1/10th.
I mean it is called an soc, perhaps you've heard of it?I don't understand the point of these $800+ phones. Realistically, what can these phones do better than a ~$400 phone? If photograhy matters a lot for you, why not get a cheap phone and a standalone camera? A sony mirrorless camera is as simple to use as a phone camera and is lightweight enough to carry around anywhere in a small bag.
The dumbest part about these expensive phones is that most people are just uploading the photos to instagram, which cuts the imagine quality by 1/10th.
Then the other two rear cameras sound like junk: an 8 MP wide-angle camera with no autofocus and a 2 MP "macro lens.
Yeah, but the SoC in the OnePlus really does beat up on the Exynos in the A54, and the Qualcomm modem is vastly superior to the Samsung.The 12R sounds weak compared to for example Samsung's A54 5G ($400, 4 OS upgrades, microSD card slot so you can add +512 GB for $40).
Sony makes phones, though. If they could build a cutting-edge "quick results" stack they absolutely would. All you need to do to see that they can't keep up is look at a comparison between Sony phone cameras and iPhones or especially Pixels. The pixels usually use Sony-manufactured sensors--worse ones than the Sony flagship phones, even--but the pictures are visibly better because Sony doesn't have that kind of in-house expertise.That's a reach. Large, standalone cameras have objectively better image quality when used by a professional who'd know what they're doing. Smartphones cater to a much different market looking for easy capture and quick results. It's mind boggling how advanced those results have been, but ridiculing standalone cameras for not having "technology" misses the most important innovations companies like Sony have been doing over the past five years. It's just that none of them cater to the point-and-shoot market because there's no demand for it. They could make such a device if they really pushed for it, but that would just rather be a large computer that happens to have an imaging sensor on board.
i agree. more then once sd card has save my data.The 12R sounds weak compared to for example Samsung's A54 5G ($400, 4 OS upgrades, microSD card slot so you can add +512 GB for $40).
lmao .Sony makes phones, though. If they could build a cutting-edge "quick results" stack they absolutely would. All you need to do to see that they can't keep up is look at a comparison between Sony phone cameras and iPhones or especially Pixels. The pixels usually use Sony-manufactured sensors--worse ones than the Sony flagship phones, even--but the pictures are visibly better because Sony doesn't have that kind of in-house expertise.
? My GFX 100S can easily exposure bracket and stack. My OM-1 has computational features that phones don’t (LiveND64, LiveComposite, in camera macro focus stacking, HHHR, pre-burst, etc). If your camera can’t do things your phone can, you bought the wrong camera. Post processing is trivial with modern software. DxO has great presets for most use cases.You should really read into what computational photography can do. Smartphones can do things that mirrorless cameras can't due to their advanced processing algorithms when matched with powerful hardware.
Hence, smartphone photos look much better out of the camera than dedicated mirrorless cameras that require substantial postprocessing to look good. For instagram uploads, it's the overall dynamic range, color, tone, and local contrast that looks pleasing to the eyes. The computational photography methods have these down well. If you're viewing the photos on a huge print or a large 4K display, then that's when the dedicated camera would have an advantage. Very few people are going to be in the latter group.
Do people really find carrying a camera such a chore? I have a 7 L Wotancraft that goes with me everywhere (when not at work). My GFX 100S, 35-70 and EF 35 f2 IS on an adapter are almost always in the bag. The bag also has my Kobo Clara, sunglasses, wallet, keys, facial tissue, tide 2 go, reusable shopping bag, and other miscellaneous things.Similarly, I've got multiple full-frame Canon bodies, bags full of fast primes and L zooms, but these almost never come out anymore unless I'm being paid to shoot something. But I still carry around a Sony RX100 iii, which is, quite frankly, an amazing camera that does fit in a pocket and is worlds better as a versatile photographic tool than even the best smartphone cameras I've used (my daily right now is most often a Samsung S23U, which is generally considered to be top-tier when it comes to its cameras).
Yeah, it’s absurd to assert that the largest photographic semiconductor company with a camera that has a global shutter and the most advanced autofocus on the planet doesn’t have the in-house expertise. Sony doesn’t spend money on their Xperia software because, they quite frankly, don’t care.lmao .
sony does have the in house expert.
but it used else where that makes far more money for them.
Pulling out a mirrorless camera will mark you out as a tourist whereas a phone snapper could be a visitor or a local who's just admiring the light. I've got mirrorless bodies and DSLRs in a dry box - I bring them out once a year for special occasions but almost all my pictures are taken on smartphones now.Our family has been in the photo business for 3 generations. I learned pretty quickly that taking pictures on vacation when you want both the subject (kids, significant others) and the background in focus works a lot better with a phone camera than a full frame DSLR. The smaller phone camera sensors have much larger depth of field. Often times I'll have the camera on my shoulder and will still pull out the phone to take the picture.
...or...your'e just a photographer. I've carried a camera with me since 2007. I enjoy photography and it's something that is always on me. Sometimes it's tiny like the Panasonic GM5 or GR IIIx. Sometimes it's bigger like the GFX 100S or Pixii. However, I always have one with me and likely will until I die.Pulling out a mirrorless camera will mark you out as a tourist whereas a phone snapper could be a visitor or a local who's just admiring the light. I've got mirrorless bodies and DSLRs in a dry box - I bring them out once a year for special occasions but almost all my pictures are taken on smartphones now.
I consider my Nokia 808 to have the best smartphone camera still. The optics, massive sensor and image processing gave it phenomenal detail but the lack of dynamic range is a big letdown. For me, the latest iPhone Pro models or Samsung S23 Ultra beats the 808 but it's taken twelve years to get this far.
RAM is cheap. Why complain?Wait, hold the phone — how much ram? 12 GB to start, a 16 GB upgrade, and 24 GB for the top of the line model? This is not a phone spec I've paid attention to lately, and these amounts sound absurd. Surely running Genshin Impact inside of WeChat isn't this costly? I know it's stupid that a Macbook Air still starts with 8 GB ram, and I regret my choice every day. But I still expect this laptop will run lots of fairly inefficient programs at the same time for many years to come. A Samsung S24 Ultra has "only" 12 GB ram and it can run Dex, a PS5 has 16 GB.
Android phones have been creeping the RAM up for years. Even an LG G8 from 2019 with a Snapdragon 855 had 6 GB/128 GB as a standard configuration. Almost all Android with Snapdragon 865 came with 8 GB standard (so 2020 flagships). Apple has been and continues to be the only company who skimps on RAM for $1k+ devices.Wait, hold the phone — how much ram? 12 GB to start, a 16 GB upgrade, and 24 GB for the top of the line model? This is not a phone spec I've paid attention to lately, and these amounts sound absurd. Surely running Genshin Impact inside of WeChat isn't this costly? I know it's stupid that a Macbook Air still starts with 8 GB ram, and I regret my choice every day. But I still expect this laptop will run lots of fairly inefficient programs at the same time for many years to come. A Samsung S24 Ultra has "only" 12 GB ram and it can run Dex, a PS5 has 16 GB.
Sometimes, I wash my IP68 phone in the sink like it's a dirty dish!
I'm not complaining, I'm just shocked! DRAM prices have been going up lately. Teslas have 8–20 GB, and that's so you can have the car sort of drive itself while you play Genshin Impact on the infotainment! I want to know what you can do on a phone that could use 24 GB of ram! (Exclamation points are cheap, and it's still possible to have too many of them!)RAM is cheap. Why complain?
That phone had enough RAM to run a lightly quantized large language model with 13 or 20 billion parameters.Wait, hold the phone — how much ram? 12 GB to start, a 16 GB upgrade, and 24 GB for the top of the line model? This is not a phone spec I've paid attention to lately, and these amounts sound absurd. Surely running Genshin Impact inside of WeChat isn't this costly? I know it's stupid that a Macbook Air still starts with 8 GB ram, and I regret my choice every day. But I still expect this laptop will run lots of fairly inefficient programs at the same time for many years to come. A Samsung S24 Ultra has "only" 12 GB ram and it can run Dex, a PS5 has 16 GB.
I bought my wife a similar camera. $1200 point and shoot Sony (can't remember which model, it was 5 years ago) with optical zoom. It's either in her purse or clipped to her pant loop, so she has it pretty much all the time. It's great and has been used a lot over the years.Similarly, I've got multiple full-frame Canon bodies, bags full of fast primes and L zooms, but these almost never come out anymore unless I'm being paid to shoot something. But I still carry around a Sony RX100 iii, which is, quite frankly, an amazing camera that does fit in a pocket and is worlds better as a versatile photographic tool than even the best smartphone cameras I've used (my daily right now is most often a Samsung S23U, which is generally considered to be top-tier when it comes to its cameras).
correct. it one of those. are phone sell well in this 1 area. not any where else anymore. their a reason wht their line of phones dont sell well in most countriesYeah, it’s absurd to assert that the largest photographic semiconductor company with a camera that has a global shutter and the most advanced autofocus on the planet doesn’t have the in-house expertise. Sony doesn’t spend money on their Xperia software because, they quite frankly, don’t care.
Sony makes phones for the same reason that Microsoft makes Surface devices: they want a technical showcase for other OEMs. Sony doesn't make the Xperia Pro-I to challenge the big boys of the phone world. They make it so they can point at it and say "see that kick ass sensor tech that you could have?" and hope Apple or Samsung put in an order for a couple million sensors.correct. it one of those. are phone sell well in this 1 area. not any where else anymore. their a reason wht their line of phones dont sell well in most countries
RAM uses battery life.RAM is cheap. Why complain?
Probably not by an appreciable amount. I think it was Crucial who stated that going from 8 GB to 16 GB of RAM was an additional few watts of consumption under load and memory is ~5% of total phone power draw at any point in time. Most of the consumption is going to be from the memory controller anyways. Given how much better iOS is with memory management, I'd happily pay the 1% or whatever battery life penalty for a better user experience.RAM uses battery life.
Typical ignorant westoid.It looks good, but I would not trust a Chinese company with making and supporting my phone.
How are the OnePlus phones overall for photos? Google, Samsung, and Apple are all at the point where their computational photography is advanced enough that they can produce miracles. Is OnePlus in the same league or are they a few steps behind like Motorola and the other B-tier Android OEM's?
There are legitimate criticisms of OnePlus phones. Some of the manufacturing defects are pretty eye opening.Typical ignorant westoid.
I don't understand the point of these $800+ phones. Realistically, what can these phones do better than a ~$400 phone? If photograhy matters a lot for you, why not get a cheap phone and a standalone camera? A sony mirrorless camera is as simple to use as a phone camera and is lightweight enough to carry around anywhere in a small bag.
The dumbest part about these expensive phones is that most people are just uploading the photos to instagram, which cuts the imagine quality by 1/10th.
The smaller size is a plus, not a downside. Still pretty huge. Anybody know of a decent midrange phone in the 5.5-6" range?
I owned 2 OnePlus phones in the past and their image processing is simply sub-par. It is servicable for daytime photos that you'd share over social media but definitely not for creating memories. The low light photography is simply abysmal and they are well behind in computational photography. You'd find images being shared that seem to look good, but you find out how poor it is when you take it alongside an iPhone or Pixel.How are the OnePlus phones overall for photos? Google, Samsung, and Apple are all at the point where their computational photography is advanced enough that they can produce miracles. Is OnePlus in the same league or are they a few steps behind like Motorola and the other B-tier Android OEM's?