Musk dumps remaining Twitter-branded stuff in auction

Given the behavior of today’s self-proclaimed conservatives, I would guess it’s an option for how much hate speech they would like to have around their ads. (Likely with a choice between “Quite a bit”, “Even more”, and “As much as possible”.)
For a limited time, upgrade to the "Even More" package for 10% more hate at no extra charge!
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)
Imagine having to portray yourself relentlessly as such a true-believer in absolutely nothing like Ms. Yaccarino every single day.

I'm not religious, but I believe that is what the absence of a soul looks like.
Yes. That's kind of a requirement to be in marketing or sales at the vast majority of companies. It's all about manipulation in pursuit of income at any cost.
One of the dumbest re-brands in modern business history. Almost as dumb as the millions of people who will voluntarily use this douchebag’s WeChat clone while proclaiming their desire for freeze peach and privacy.
NPR just fun with it this morning calling it "the company formerly known as Twitter". It's as awkward as Prince's temporary rebrand but with considerably less thought put into it.
 
Upvote
8 (8 / 0)

justskot

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
101
Imagine having to portray yourself relentlessly as such a true-believer in absolutely nothing like Ms. Yaccarino every single day.

I'm not religious, but I believe that is what the absence of a soul looks like.
Isn't she doing exactly what she's supposed to? She's being a consistent, positive force in a messy transition, ensuring customers who are buying ads that X is a new start with new moderation tools and a safe place for their business.

I'm thinking this is all part of the strategy and what their team is assuming the most likely way to keep the company alive for the next few months / years.
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)

sarusa

Ars Praefectus
3,073
Subscriptor++
And thank for for continuing to call this dumpster fire Twitter in the headlines so we know what you're talking about. It's still Twitter, not Elmo's 14-yo boy whim of making the company completely un-recognizable ('X'). Or at least add 'aka Twitter' like you do with FB and Meta. Don't give them (Elmo or Zuck) the satisfaction of successfully pulling off their malicious big switcheroos.
 
Upvote
-11 (0 / -11)
Imagine having to portray yourself relentlessly as such a true-believer in absolutely nothing like Ms. Yaccarino every single day.

I'm not religious, but I believe that is what the absence of a soul looks like.
At a glance it looks like she doesn't "have to" do this at all but WANTS TO.
Furthermore from what I've seen of her the loss of her soul/essence is self-inflicted.

Scary AF and I'd probably run away if I met her on the street. Brrr.
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)
He failed so badly at this previously he was booted from a company.

What, exactly, do they say about doing the same thing thing that failed before, and expectations about different results?
No, no, you see, this is entirely different. Last time he was going to try and make a bank, but one you could use only via a website. This time he wants to make a combination messaging service/social media/ride share/payment platform, all in one app, because these are clearly all things that people are just crying out to all be jammed into a single app.

But seriously, he still seems to believe that the original X.com didn't fail because it was a horribly bad idea and the focus groups all thought that X.com sounded like an adult website, it failed because he was stabbed in the back. This is his attempt to prove that he really was a genius all along. And, uh, yeah, we can all see how that's going.
 
Upvote
17 (17 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
I wonder why Elon thinks this is going to be more successful than his first try at x.com?

Or maybe he just expects the same result, in that someone will come along and buy him out?
He sees WeChats popularity in China and truly believes Americans will just fall in line. Without him understanding WHY WeChat exists and is popular in the first place.
 
Upvote
22 (22 / 0)

Wheels Of Confusion

Ars Legatus Legionis
71,102
Subscriptor
No, no, you see, this is entirely different. Last time he was going to try and make a bank, but one you could use only via a website. This time he wants to make a combination messaging service/social media/ride share/payment platform, all in one app, because these are clearly all things that people are just crying out to all be jammed into a single app.

But seriously, he still seems to believe that the original X.com didn't fail because it was a horribly bad idea and the focus groups all thought that X.com sounded like an adult website, it failed because he was stabbed in the back. This is his attempt to prove that he really was a genius all along. And, uh, yeah, we can all see how that's going.
Once again, X.com cannot fail. It can only BE failed!
 
Upvote
12 (12 / 0)

Readercathead

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,377
Subscriptor
Imagine having to portray yourself relentlessly as such a true-believer in absolutely nothing like Ms. Yaccarino every single day.

I'm not religious, but I believe that is what the absence of a soul looks like.
Her vacuous word vomit does not merit inclusion in any reputable outlet. Even more than Elon himself, we know her words mean nothing since a) Elon can and does undermine her on a whim b) she‘ll say anything to get what she wants c) she’s a corrupt and venal Trump admin crony d) most likely she’ll be out on her ear before the year is out.
 
Upvote
16 (16 / 0)

aeoiuny

Smack-Fu Master, in training
31
He sees WeChats popularity in China and truly believes Americans will just fall in line. Without him understanding WHY WeChat exists and is popular in the first place.
I'm down, why does Tiktok and Wechat exist and why is it popular in the first place?
Why are there versions for users in China as well as versions for users outside of China?
Do you think the India ban will change how users feel about these apps?
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

Litazia

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,140
Subscriptor
You're asking the wrong question, my friend. What can't you do with a podium with the bird logo? House podia never went out of style. In a pinch, you could use it for a lectern!
Only thing I can think of doing with it is cat furniture. I'm sure my cat would love another place he can climb on so he can watch to see if we're going to give him food.
 
Upvote
8 (8 / 0)
She said that the rebranding allowed the company to move on from Twitter's old mindset and products, preparing X users for new kinds of experiences on the platform.

More NFT, Crypto and Elon edgelord spam, can't wait!

...oh wait, nevermind, I closed my accounts when Twixxer moved security behind a paywall.
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

Fritzr

Ars Legatus Legionis
15,326
Getting other people to pay for taking your own signage down and disposing of it afterwards is cunning, I’ll give him that.
It's pretty much standard practice at an industrial liquidation for items like the building logos that will require licensed contractors to comply with local regulations to remove & basic severance of liability for a third party's action should the buyer try to save money by not complying with local law.

Normally found in the detailed auction program to ensure bidders are aware of the complications for items that will require uninstalling at buyer expense for transport. Just not commonly reported in news stories.

Other variations include things like the saw line of a saw mill. It is a massive installation and would be sold as is, buyer will disassemble on site at their own expense and remove it from the property with an agreed time limit on the removal.

Auction buyers bid while aware of the additional costs. They discount the amount they are willing to bid by the estimated cost of taking the auction lot home.

Disassembly or uninstallation are unnecessary expenses for the seller. For the buyer, they are just part of the cost.
 
Upvote
12 (13 / -1)

Fritzr

Ars Legatus Legionis
15,326
So we could, conceivably, buy the signs and leave them on the building? And because they belong to us, they can’t mess with them because that’s our private property?
Nope. The winning bidder is required to remove them. That is stated in the auction announcement and will be restated, in legalese, in the documents the buyer will have to sign to complete the purchase.

Failure to comply will result in the sale being cancelled, likely with an optional penalty deducted from the payment refund that would cover the cost of selling them to a local scrapyard. Losing bidders can also be notified of the availability of the item.

This is standard practice for installations sold at auction.

Don't be a defaulting auction buyer. Auctions tend to make defaulting buyers regret their actions in order to minimise the number of such problems.
 
Upvote
12 (12 / 0)

Fritzr

Ars Legatus Legionis
15,326
Or we could get a contractor to remove them who does a very noisy job of removing the signs (preferably when Musk is in the office). Then does a cheap job patching up the holes they leave behind.
Unless it is disclosed prior to sale as part of the buyer's responsibilities, the buyer simply removes the signs exercising "reasonable care" and the building owner is responsible for any work needed on the wall where the sign was mounted.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Fritzr

Ars Legatus Legionis
15,326
Twitter the website wasn’t fun, but Twitter the company seemed like a fun place to work. Musk is removing all the fun.

Yaccarino says “You look at video, and soon you’ll be able to make video chat calls without having to give your phone number to anyone on the platform” and I don't know what universe she lives in. Not only you don’t need your phone to start any video call, but in general you don't do video calls with anonymous people so there is no need for something more anonymous than an email to share video call links. Actually how would that work exactly? Anyone could just call any other X handle? I can't imagine the spam calling. How would X know whether it’s a legitimate call or not?

And the creator compensation thing… one needs to rake 5 million views over three months knowing that only premium views count, and there is less than one million premium users according to Statista. So all premium users need to view one creator‘s content more than 5 times over 3 months for that creator to make 10$, while the creator pays 21$, making this a simple discount. Am I missing something here?
Facebook Messenger and many other IMs have been doing "No phone number required video calls" for decades now. All you need is an account on an IM that connects to the IM the other party is on (not sure if it is still a thing, but there were several IMs that did cross network video chat). This isn't innovation, it's more like revealing your ignorance of the market you want to take over.
 
Upvote
13 (13 / 0)
An "everything app" only sounds desirable to a) the avaricious goober who thinks he'll make money off of it, b) hackers, c) phishers, and d) intelligence agencies.

Why would I trust this libertarian nut to robustly comply with regulations about banking, investment, healthcare, licensing, and whatever else "everything" covers?
 
Upvote
17 (17 / 0)

Wheels Of Confusion

Ars Legatus Legionis
71,102
Subscriptor
An "everything app" only sounds desirable to a) the avaricious goober who thinks he'll make money off of it, b) hackers, c) phishers, and d) intelligence agencies.

Why would I trust this libertarian nut to robustly comply with regulations about banking, investment, healthcare, licensing, and whatever else "everything" covers?
He has enough trouble complying with regulations in literally anything he does as-is.
 
Upvote
14 (14 / 0)

Fritzr

Ars Legatus Legionis
15,326
How is xitter pronounced? With x sounding like sh, as in latinized mandarin I assume?
If you're speaking English, an initial x followed by a vowel is sounded as letter z by default. Xylophone is the best known X word. They tend to be anglicised Latin and very common in medical terminology.

This rule is far older than latinized Mandarin/Cantonese.

Exceptions such as Xiaomi (which is latinized Mandarin) are learned on a case by case basis.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
There’s a podium with the bird logo that’s tempting, but what am I going to do with a podium, and why do I want to give more money to Elon Musk than I have to? Especially since the ideal amount of money I give to Musk is $0?
I have a vivid memory of hanging the ENRON letters from a ladder at a trade show before they went under. I wonder what happened to them?
edit; The letters, not the company!
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)

scrimbul

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,462
Musk is the epitome of thinking you are smarter than you really are.
Sometimes the only purpose of your life is as a warning to others, and we're beginning to see that applies to pretty much everyone with a personal net worth exceeding seven figures regardless of how much good they do for society or humanity as a whole.
 
Upvote
8 (8 / 0)
The whole X concept seems like a clear contravention of competition laws across the EU, US and UK (to varying degrees). Yes, it will take 10+ for any of the regulators to find the budget and political willpower to actually do anything, but it seems unavoidable. "Absolute Free Speech" Musk took no time at all showing how flexible his preached principles were...
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)