<P>do you just run around and call everyone a troll?<BR>---------<BR>No, just people that fabricat BS lists that have little basis in reality.<P><BR> sure, we can say how pentium 233s boot up slow, but why don't we use the information we know (300 mhz) computer and compare it that way? even<BR> if there was a hell of a lot of ram on the pc machine, there's still a good chance that you can set it to boot up quite fast <BR>---------<BR>And "there's still a good chance that you can set" the 9600 "to boot up quite fast." So what is the point? <P> 1. hey, if the pc has 700 or so macs, I assure you that if you have a good motherboard, you don't need to wait 5 minutes for it to boot.<BR>--------<BR>IF you had a good mobo?? <BR>That is because (AFAIK-ICBW) the PC doesn't automatically check the RAM on start-up. the mac does. You can set it to not do so. There are other ways to speed up the Mac. And other questions, was a start up volume chosen, were there apps that auto start etc.<P> 2. last time I checked, I never crashed my pc by inserting a floppy<BR>-----<BR>That is because the PC is incapable of autodetecting a floppy. (or a ZIP?) I know it can do a CD, sometimes. But the point is, the problem was not with the Zip, that just made the problem show itself.<P><BR> 3. I knew about apple e (which doesn't work all the time) didn't know about the mouse button. What a have to say about this is if the mac is so<BR> "intuitive", why is it so much easier for my grandma to eject a disk on a pc?<BR>---------<BR>Because the auto detect feature is more advanced, as is the software put away. <P> <BR> 5. Oh, by the way, I worked in the graphics department with 30 or so odd macs as tech support. Every time we got a new mac, we'd do a clean<BR> install, install just what we needed to use (quark, Photoshop, illustrator) connected to a quad processor Unix server. So I?ve dealt with macs before,<BR> and boy, those things didn't have anywhere near the reliability of NT machines (the macs were always hanging, and after a while, sometimes they'd<BR> start hanging all they time)<BR>--------<BR>Any time frames for the Macs and NT machines you were using??<P><BR> 6. Yeah, voodoo 3 with beta drivers. Swell. One of the largest games to hit the shelves this year, quake 3, doesn't work well with voodoo 3 due to<BR> driver issues. Yeah, that's something that I want to put on my machine. If you think that's "good", then some people just have lower standards than others I guess.<BR>-------<BR>So you are not using Win2k?? That is also Beta. The drivers are beta as a technicality, so they aren't held financially responsible for them. They have been very responsive to glitches and or bug fixes, and they work quite well. I would rather they were fully supported, but they work and that is what really counts. And Anantech doesn't seem to show a problem with the voodoo drivers on Q3:A... but what do they know...<P> 7. So you're happy with the multitasking in 7.x??? Hmm, low expectations. It really is. I was talking about mac os x style multitasking<BR>---------<BR>Here is where you need to read a bit more carefully. YOU said that macs can only do one thing at a time. HA said you must not be familiar with Macs, and if you are you are only familiar with 7.x. See, we can do lots of things at the same time on the Macs, and we do. The MT is not as good as NT, and I wish it was, but your statement was still ludicrous. (This is the kind of stuff I was refering to as trolling.)<P><BR> 8. NT 3.1. Came out in 1993. The form of Macintosh multiprocessing isn't good as of yet. geez, why do you think they're developing the macosx not<BR> from the regular macos9. .<BR>--------<BR>I think you may be confusing multi-tasking with multi-processing. The Macs have do MP before, long before.(And I think before Windows was ICBW) They can't do it now, but that is hopefully changing. Of course, Win9x can't do it either...<P>