Harbinger’s electric van drives like a classic, and that’s the point

Infrastructure in place first electric truck/vehicle second, might work for a large company with plenty of space and money to burn, a smaller company with no room not so much, what happened to all those Tesla trucks?
Tesla Semi has been delivered in small volume to several different buyers starting in late 2022, most notably Pepsico. Plus some inhouse use.

Assembly line production is expected to commence late 2025 or early 2026, eventually ramping to 50k units per year.

Freightliner eCascadia is in a similar "deliver small volumes to select customers, use some inhouse" mode, not sure if they've announced when they plan to ramp production.
 
Upvote
21 (23 / -2)
Well, to be fair, the powertrain and body in a passenger car is much more integrated.

Box trucks, of this sort, have long since been a two part production. Chassis/drivetrain and body, as mentioned in the article. Makes it a lot easier for Harbinger to just focus on their area of expertise.

I've driven box trucks like this quite a bit. Maybe the upfitters will take a cue and make their cabins more comfortable for the drivers? On can hope.
It's interesting that some cars used to be this way, back in the 1920's. You'd buy the chassis and powertrain from one manufacturer - say, Bugatti - and then have it sent to a "coach builder" for the body. This was for the high-end estate cars, before Ford brought mass-produced cars to the "masses."

Interesting that the practice hangs on in trucks like this. I mean, sure, in context of adapting the truck to the individual business, it makes total sense.

If Harbinger gets their powertrain design and production right, I think they're going to have really fantastic success. Love the business philosophy on this one. And I think the other poster above is right - if they do really well, they're likely to be bought out by one of the major manufacturers and the product line extended both in scope and production numbers.

This is a really good thing for bringing this segment into the EV world.
 
Upvote
45 (45 / 0)
Regular-sized garbage trucks are built on top of a regular truck chassis, so all you need is to take an EV truck and build a garbage truck on top of it. The biggest change is probably that the stuff that used to run off of the PTO wheel in the engine (such as the rear scoop and lifter of the garbage cans) now needs to be electric, but that isn’t exactly hard. For special needs (think cities where the streets are narrow and corners are sharp) there are special, smaller garbage trucks, but most aren’t like that.

Anyway: garbage trucks like this exist where I live (Sweden) and they have for a while. This isn’t hard. Making long-distance trucks electric or even hybrid is much harder.
Garbage trucks in the US tend to have the lift and other functions powered by hydraulics, which makes it even easier to electrify - You simply have an auxiliary electric motor drive the hydraulic pump.

Much like Harbinger, then, electrifying a garbage truck here is a matter of replacing the powertrain and fitting a motor to drive the hydraulics, and then leaving the rest as it is.
 
Upvote
42 (43 / -1)
How widespread are the Amazon EV delivery vehicles?
I’ve seen more than a few of the FedEx EV delivery trucks without even looking for them. All the Amazons in my area still appear to be Sprinters. I should take a peak at the lot of the distribution hub in my area. Maybe a few in there.
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

stefan_lec

Ars Praetorian
522
Subscriptor
Upvote
43 (43 / 0)
It's interesting that some cars used to be this way, back in the 1920's. You'd buy the chassis and powertrain from one manufacturer - say, Bugatti - and then have it sent to a "coach builder" for the body. This was for the high-end estate cars, before Ford brought mass-produced cars to the "masses."
What you speak of was the era of the coach builders. None of those were working class cars. They were all commissioned for the rich or royalty. Post WW2, there was a period of time when the working class could have access to some less expensive coach built cars, mostly still hand built, definitely low production numbers, through builders like Pininfarina, Bertone, Ghia, ItalDesign and others.
 
Upvote
24 (24 / 0)

m0nckywrench

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,261
When will a company form to design retrofit EV packages to bolt onto the zillions of existing chassis?
Retrofitting existing chassis is far more labor-intensive and time-consuming than new build.
Complete vehicle disassembly and repair/replacement of worn standard parts, all or most wiring harness, replacing controls. doing a cab gut rehab etc is a daunting deterrent. High labor costs and vehicle downtime (when it's not hauling thousands of dollars are sacrificed) make that mostly a non-starter, niche specialty vehicles civilian and military sometimes excepted. It makes more sense to follow current practices and divest or scrap (vehicle salvage and metal recycling are mature industries) expended vehicles.

Once BEV have compelling TCO advantages fleet owners will adopt them to compete then smaller fry must eventually do likewise.

Aging fleets and lack of chassis availability for new builds can make new bodies on EV chassis attractive.

https://www.automotive-fleet.com/10193281/survey-average-truck-age-exceeds-normal-cycle
 
Upvote
29 (29 / 0)

theoryandpractice13345

Smack-Fu Master, in training
68
If Harbinger is successful, Ford or Freightliner will just buy them. This lets the little companies innovate and take on all the risk while the behemoths like Ford stick to the core business and acquire smaller companies when it makes sense.

Personally I think EVs in this space are a sure fire thing. I've been watching Harbinger for a year or two. Their focus is perfect and I suspect they will deliver on their vision. Keeping the scope of the changes limited is exactly how you incrementally innovate. You don't need to reinvent the truck, only the power train. This is still a big leap forward, even if they aren't promising the moon.
You make that sound like a bad thing.

When it is done right, acquisitions are good for tech because the acquiring company can provide scale. Especially for a company like this one that focuses on what it value adds but is compatible with existing tech.
 
Upvote
18 (19 / -1)

m0nckywrench

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,261
Much like Harbinger, then, electrifying a garbage truck here is a matter of replacing the powertrain and fitting a motor to drive the hydraulics, and then leaving the rest as it is.
Trucks taken down for retrofit will need electrical harness and control swaps, basically a gut rehab. Trying to save too much of an old commercial vehicle easily backfires, the reason ambulance bodies are remounted onto new chassis.

https://emergencyvehiclesplus.com/vehicle-remount/ambulance-remounts/

A truck may appear fine on the outside and be a nightmare beneath. A garbage truck body is a large steel weldment making it fairly easy to repair (done all the time because they lead hard lives). Removing the body to sort it out then placing on a ready new chassis offers a much longer working life.

Trucks (and trailers) appear rugged but frames crack over time while other bits like suspension are often so worn and corroded they're removed by cutting torch since none of the assembly is worth attempting to save.

BTW trucks are satisfying to work on and that job is sufficiently complex it's not under practical threat of automation. Skills necessary today include electronics and understanding computers so Arsians wanting a secure career and reasonably fit might consider working on them. Unlike car repair which is a race to the bottom trucks have a higher barrier to entry because most people aren't familiar with them. Seniority is valuable and valued because downed trucks cost owners much more than repairs.
 
Upvote
46 (46 / 0)

theoryandpractice13345

Smack-Fu Master, in training
68
"...but its affordability is at least partially dependent on federal incentives."

Good luck with that. And I do mean it.
Even though the current administration seems hell bent on protecting oil market share, not every administration is in the same page. Plus, in addition to total cost of operation advantages, EV helps in diversifying fuel sources for transportation.
 
Upvote
12 (12 / 0)

LieutenantLefse

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,136
Subscriptor++
In SoCal, I'd say about 1 in 6 of the Amazon trucks I see are EV. So, not prevalent yet, but also not uncommon, at least here.

I see them all the time here in Saint Paul, MN. Amazon themselves says they have 20,000 of them on the road with a goal of getting to 100,000 by 2030. Which is interesting given various sources claim their total fleet was "only" 30,000 strong just a few years ago.
 
Upvote
13 (13 / 0)

ajm8127

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
103
You make that sound like a bad thing.

When it is done right, acquisitions are good for tech because the acquiring company can provide scale. Especially for a company like this one that focuses on what it value adds but is compatible with existing tech.
I guess something was lost in my text or in your interpretation of it, but I don't necessarily think acquisitions are a bad thing.

Taken to the extreme acquisitions can reduce competition, but in the case of a company like Ford buying a company like Harbinger Motors, I think that is a healthy example of how acquisitions can provide a net benefit.
 
Upvote
12 (12 / 0)

Fatesrider

Ars Legatus Legionis
22,893
Subscriptor
Seems like an intelligent approach in a little-known but badly needed space where EVs can have an outsized impact. So intelligent, in fact, that I have to wonder why Ford isn’t doing the same thing?
From the business side, the outsized impact is largely in the cost savings and better community impact over time. With lower maintenance frequency and cost, lower noise levels in residential/commercial zones, equivalent daily mileage used, and as gas prices continue to oscillate between "Fluffy" and "Oh, HELL no!", lower "refueling" costs, it's a smart business investment.

The side issue of lower emissions in heavily trafficked areas is an additional health benefit, since the ICE versions of these kinds of vehicles are typically exempt as commercial, rather than POV, so are typically allowed to have higher pollution levels than an ICE of equivalent weight and mileage.

And if anyone who's bothered to read my rants about EV's, are surprised by this, keep in mind I do differentiate between POV's - which in their entirety, are unsustainable - and commercial vehicles that transport goods from place to place. They create high pollution pockets and corridors in communities that would otherwise not have them if all the commercial transportation industry were electrified. Costs would lower for everyone, in most parts of their lives. So this is something I do get behind, because vehicle for vehicle, it has a far greater positive community impact taking any ICE commercial truck off the road and replacing it with an EV.

It won't do shit for slowing down climate change, but it will improve the quality of life in the community by quite a bit. And that's mostly why I like to see this happening.

Assuming this reality allows it to happen, of course. We live in a world where I can literally see this fucking administration banning EV sales as, "woke".
 
Upvote
21 (22 / -1)

appliance

Ars Scholae Palatinae
827
How widespread are the Amazon EV delivery vehicles?
There's about 20,000 on the road and counting. They are also leaders in fleet management software which has led to a contract for rolling chassis for the Canadien Post Office. Sales have just opened for other fleets besides Amazon.
 
Upvote
12 (12 / 0)

1972foreva

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
157
If Harbinger is successful, Ford or Freightliner will just buy them. This lets the little companies innovate and take on all the risk while the behemoths like Ford stick to the core business and acquire smaller companies when it makes sense.

Personally I think EVs in this space are a sure fire thing. I've been watching Harbinger for a year or two. Their focus is perfect and I suspect they will deliver on their vision. Keeping the scope of the changes limited is exactly how you incrementally innovate. You don't need to reinvent the truck, only the power train. This is still a big leap forward, even if they aren't promising the moon.
This is sadly typical across many industries. Those with the money to innovate are risk averse, leaving startups to maybe get lucky but most likely run out of funding and lose all the data too
 
Upvote
0 (3 / -3)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
IIRC, those medium duty trucks are also exempt from EPA regulations, so these would be a major reduction in emissions while providing a better experience all around. Harbinger, indeed, lol
That is incorrect, all class 1-8 trucks have pollution controls and are regulated for emissions by the EPA. They all have gasoline/diesel as applicable DOC, DPF filters, SCR (def), EGT, Cats and etc from the date this was required. You maybe confusing that trucks with a GVWR > 8500lbs wich are exempt from NHTSA CAFE (fuel economy) standards with a lack of pollution controls. https://www.epa.gov/regulations-emi...ns-greenhouse-gas-emissions-commercial-trucks

Ships are exempt from pollution controls, as are all military vehicles. But all other ground transportation emissions are regulated by the EPA.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
28 (28 / 0)
Some parts of China have seen diesel or CNG medium-duty panel trucks replaced by EV equivalents, making air in those cities a lot cleaner. European cities still have air quality issues from all the diesel engines rattling around.

Seeing a heavy EV dump truck whoosh forward like a drag racer was something else.
*Some European cities, unless you think comparing Alabama's education with the whole USA is also fair
 
Upvote
9 (10 / -1)
They've gone through a number of iterations and have been in this space for a few years, but time has moved on. I think fleet buyers will be looking for a few things: Price sure, productivity (vehicles and driver), and fleet management software. I feel that competition has already passed them with more sophisticated solutions. And if a buyer just wanted an electric version of their existing trucks, there are people who can do that. I wish them luck, but I just don't see it.
Who are their competitors that have left them behind?
 
Upvote
27 (27 / 0)
Regular-sized garbage trucks are built on top of a regular truck chassis, so all you need is to take an EV truck and build a garbage truck on top of it. The biggest change is probably that the stuff that used to run off of the PTO wheel in the engine (such as the rear scoop and lifter of the garbage cans) now needs to be electric, but that isn’t exactly hard. For special needs (think cities where the streets are narrow and corners are sharp) there are special, smaller garbage trucks, but most aren’t like that.

Anyway: garbage trucks like this exist where I live (Sweden) and they have for a while. This isn’t hard. Making long-distance trucks electric or even hybrid is much harder.
Same, the garbage trucks here in Oslo are electrical, and a lot of small commercial vans are electrical Mercedes Sprinter and VW id.buzz conversions.

Speaking of Sweden, Scania has an electrical truck, though some battery options will only be available later this year. For the range, they say this:
Realistically, even for a long-haulage operation in Europe, the speed and driver rest regulations mean you’ll never drive more than 360 km in a single stint (4.5 hours of driving, at 85 km/h maximum speed). And the driver rest period is of course always the most optimal time to charge your truck away from the depot no matter your maximum range. Thanks to the GTW allowance increase for electric vehicles, with the addition of our upcoming MP12 under-cab battery we will be able to deliver a 520 kWh capacity option for 380 km of typical range without affecting your legally allowed payload maximum – letting you electrify without compromised transport capacity.

The new under-the-cab battery module, allowing for the 520 and 728 kWh battery capacities will be available for order during 2025. However, the concept of optimising battery capacity vs payload instead of maximising battery capacity, might be new to many customers. It might take some consideration to decide the optimum relation between range and payload. So rather than waiting with our MP12 launch until it is available for order, announcing your future options already today buys you time for the conversations and calculations that lead to the right choices for your operation – supported by the constant help and guidance of your Scania representative.

Battery capacity


416, 520*, 624 or 728* kWh installed with 75 or 83 % SoC-window.
(* 520 and 728 kWh options will be available for order during 2025)

Payload optimised range examples – up to:
350 km at 29 t GTW, 416 kWh
395 km at 42 t GTW, 520 kWh
375 km at 64 t GTW, 728 kWh
 
Upvote
18 (18 / 0)

DeeplyUnconcerned

Ars Scholae Palatinae
727
Subscriptor++
This approach could be used with cars as well. Buy the skateboard from a chassis manufacturer and slap the body of your choice on top.

This was a widespread approach in early automotive history. "Body by Fisher" was not just a saying, but a way of doing business.
My understanding is that this isn't done because achieving all the necessary engineering goals in such a constrained chassis format (strength, rigidity, crumple zones etc) is difficult/expensive/heavy, while the body becomes structural deadweight that has to be carried without contributing anything.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

Control Group

Ars Legatus Legionis
18,963
Subscriptor++
For cars, the space ship look has a lot to do with aerodynamics to get maximum range. Truck aerodynamics are pretty much hopeless, because they are necessarily big boxes on wheels.
Also the trucks don’t need the aero anywhere near as much as passenger cars. They spend a huge percentage of their time moving at 30 mph or lower, where atmospheric drag is a small part of the energy cost.
 
Upvote
30 (30 / 0)
Regular-sized garbage trucks are built on top of a regular truck chassis, so all you need is to take an EV truck and build a garbage truck on top of it. The biggest change is probably that the stuff that used to run off of the PTO wheel in the engine (such as the rear scoop and lifter of the garbage cans) now needs to be electric, but that isn’t exactly hard. For special needs (think cities where the streets are narrow and corners are sharp) there are special, smaller garbage trucks, but most aren’t like that.

Anyway: garbage trucks like this exist where I live (Sweden) and they have for a while. This isn’t hard. Making long-distance trucks electric or even hybrid is much harder.

BYD makes and sells EV garbage and recycling trucks, and other municipal utility vehicles, in the US. Many municipalities are testing them out with a small percentage of their fleet to see how they work throughout the year and for several yearly maintenance cycles, which is a reasonable approach.
 
Upvote
15 (15 / 0)

real mikeb_60

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
12,160
Fucking finally. BEV manufacturers are slowly, slowly coming around to the notion that BEVs don't need to look like space ships or baby's first cosplay. Traditional car design has matured for well over a century; just keep doing that except with batteries instead of gasoline! Glad to see Harbinger is taking this extremely sensible approach to the mid-size truck market; I wish them all the luck in the world!
The traditional truckmakers have used a similar approach. Freightliner and others have offered heavy-duty "vocational" trucks (chassis-cabs for the most part) for several years now, and have sold quite a few into the ports markets in California (at first due to regulations, but now the TCO benefits are selling them too). This kind of urban/medium range/medium-heavy duty use, where trucks surge in and out of terminals regularly, is the kind of operation where EVs are a no-brainer based on TCO once you get past the purchase/lease cost. Tesla, of course, went for the long-distance market (with spaceship styling) where that kind of operation with practical battery sizes (hence ranges of around 200 miles tops) isn't possible; other than the occasional Pepsi dray, I haven't seen many. If I can only tell the truck is EV by nose (no diesel smell/smoke), or some kind of reasonably discreet Clean Air decal, that's great as far as I'm concerned.

One thing that might be interesting as an addition to the article would be how these EVs compete with CNG. That's been a popular diesel alternative in some places (especially California) for years, and is well-established in fleets like those of UPS, and in most California urban bus fleets..
 
Upvote
8 (8 / 0)

Ed1024

Ars Scholae Palatinae
810
Subscriptor++
Great to see something that isn’t a high end concept mule, that has been no-frills engineered to do an important job. Having most of the parts come from outside means there’s a chance of the product being serviceable for a long time, no matter what happens to Harbinger - I wish them luck.

Fitting 330 employees into a 5,000sqft factory probably helped a lot with efficiency ;)
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)

real mikeb_60

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
12,160
In SoCal, I'd say about 1 in 6 of the Amazon trucks I see are EV. So, not prevalent yet, but also not uncommon, at least here.
Electric Amazon trucks appeared in quantity around Sacramento last summer and are fairly common now. Freightliner's Brightdrops have become fairly common around here, too, since late 2024, with the diesels becoming the exceptions rather than the rule. A few EV UPS trucks have appeared, but they're still mostly running the old CNG trucks. Walmart had some big e-Transits for a while, but has reverted to the Uber model with drivers running around in their own cars.

Haven't seen bigger E-trucks much yet, but then those tend to be seldom replaced so penetration of new anything (even CNG was slow to appear for things like garbage trucks until ARB pretty much made diesels in public agency fleets illegal).

Edits for clarity and reduced redundancy.
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)

chalex

Ars Legatus Legionis
11,581
Subscriptor++
The main actual core competency seems to be:
1) the electric motor
2) the battery pack

The rest of it does not seem too differentiated from other truck manufacturers.

There are several other companies who have the same core competency (e.g. Rivian, Lucid trying to challenge Tesla), so we'll see who wins.
 
Upvote
4 (5 / -1)