Yeah, it's kind of weird that they didn't charge him with actual theft..It's rare we have a story about piracy where the person was actually stealing
Ah, so 1 downloaded illegal copy equals $1 loss. Glad we could finally clear that up.
Also, did Trump issue an order that all departments must speak like he does?
If he committed numerous vehicular homicides, he'd be facing many more than seven years. He is facing what he's facing because each one he did is a separate charge. It's about scale.If he committed vehicular homicide in my home state he would only face up to seven years. The justice system is deeply broken.
In my state they would buy him coffee and tell him they're sorry the car was damaged.If he committed vehicular homicide in my home state he would only face up to seven years. The justice system is deeply broken.
State Attorney Jack Campbell, the local prosecutor, told WCTV that a driver being negligent isn’t enough on its own even if they do kill somebody.
“The courts in Florida found that generally speed alone is not enough for (a felony),” Campbell said. “A simple traffic violation is not enough.... we have to look at it on case by case basis.”
Additionally, Campbell said the legislature, courts and society have generally found that the act of killing someone during a crash is not enough to put someone away in prison.
To do that, the driver needed to act “reckless,” not just “negligent.”
Sooo. like 2 Trump golf outings?The DOJ claimed that "copies of Spider-Man: No Way Home were downloaded tens of millions of times, with an estimated loss to the copyright owner of tens of millions of dollars."
of all the reactions one could have (and post), you felt embarrassment? Isn't this cynicism indicative of a wider social problem? A man could face 15 years for this. That's not handwringing or cynicism. That's a man's life, and our taxes pay for his imprisonment. We pay to imprison this man, who made a little money by releasing copies a few days before..., and they are accusing him of theft of tens of millions of dollars, as if every one who downloaded would have bought the movie at full price. If you want to criticize the handwringing about piracy, well, that's embarrassing all right, but you seem to think it's the other way around. On an article from yesterday no less.That amount of handwringing and cynicism in this thread is embarrassing.
I agree.I dunno...
For the ripping and such, yeah, if that's all he did for his own personal entertainment, I can see a case for leniency.
But the sharing part is what got him in trouble in the first place.
He was STUPID. And stupidity should be accompanied by an equal level of pain.
<snip>
This should never have been a fucking crime. Stealing the individual disks, sure, that's theft. Give him six months probation for that. Uploading a file? Fifteen years in prison? That's fucking insane. You don't get fifteen years in prison for raping someone, which generally, you know, permanently damages a precious human psyche and is one of the most evil things a person can do.Don't do the crime....
Only in the bright and happy timeline, not this one.Does that apply to everyone?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indictments_against_Donald_Trump
Because profits of big corporations are more important in the eyes of the law.The kid who swatted hundreds of people only got 4 years.
The idea that the defendant would face consecutive 5- and 10-year terms is an invention of the headline writer. It's extremely unlikely that he'd face consecutive sentences if he pleads guilty; hell, even if found guilty after a trial, consecutive sentences are unlikely. Federal sentencing guidelines would limit his term down to a likely 5 years. This is just lazy writing on Ars' part. It's clickbait for the pro-piracy faction here at Ars.If he committed vehicular homicide in my home state he would only face up to seven years. The justice system is deeply broken.
Swatters and Jan 6 insurrectionists all faced stiffer sentences than what they actually received. Just like this thief. And just like them, the actual sentence will be far lower than the theoretical maximum of 5+10 years consecutive.And most insurrectionists who stormed the Capitol, even violent ones, got no more than that. Before getting pardoned.
I know this guy has not been sentenced yet and probably won't get the full 15 years. And stealing anything, including pirating DVDs on a commercial scale, is clearly wrong. But there is something not right with the proportions of crime and punishment somewhere here.
Almost seventy years of copyright fuckery by Marvel and then Sony, but it's the DVD thief that gets the major headlines. "Rightsholders," I tell ya.It was also a hard fight to get the Spider-Man movie, in particular, on the big screen. When Spider-Man: No Way Home was released, Marvel struck a deal with the estate of Spider-Man co-creator Steve Ditko to settle several copyright disputes over who owns the rights to the character and others in the Marvel universe, Fortune reported That settlement allowed for Spider-Man: No Way Home's release, which seemed to mark a return to big box office earnings for studios, despite the rampant piracy.
The man who committed a couo on he United States didn't get anything and his goons only got a few years.The kid who swatted hundreds of people only got 4 years.
The original headline was "FBI nabs worker at DVD company for ripping prerelease Marvel blockbusters," which I thought was more informative.I am once again BEGGING that Ars start covering news accurately and honestly.
This person is charged with physically stealing the unreleased films, then selling them.
Yeah piracy was a part of it, but its highly misleading and dishonest to call this a “Sharing DVD rip” in the headline when that’s just incidental to the massive theft story.
The main damage is assumed to be from piracy over the Internet, not just because he stole physical DVDs.I am once again BEGGING that Ars start covering news accurately and honestly.
This person is charged with physically stealing the unreleased films, then selling them.
Yeah piracy was a part of it, but its highly misleading and dishonest to call this a “Sharing DVD rip” in the headline when that’s just incidental to the massive theft story.
If you read the DOJ press release, there is NO CHARGE of theft and ONE count of interstate transportation of stolen goods. Piracy (IP theft) is the main feature of their charges.I am once again BEGGING that Ars start covering news accurately and honestly.
This person is charged with physically stealing the unreleased films, then selling them.
Yeah piracy was a part of it, but its highly misleading and dishonest to call this a “Sharing DVD rip” in the headline when that’s just incidental to the massive theft story.