Even the worst mass extinction had its oases

julesverne

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,154
It seems plausible that isolated microclimatological pockets might have functioned as biological arks during the catastrophe, retaining some of biological diversity over the extended period of instability. Perhaps similar to the case of Wollemia Nobilis which was found alive in isolated gorges in Australia 2 million years after the last fossil record.
 
Upvote
47 (47 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

polarism

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
101
Subscriptor++
It's going to gradually be less hospitable to us, but life is going to find a way to survive for a while.
Yeah there are likely going to be forms of bacteria and smaller things that stick around awhile.

I am starting to think that the data is indicating to us a high likelihood of a sterilization event though, in the wake of our extinction.

Feedback loops ultimately will decide, and we won't be around to observe it either way.
 
Upvote
-18 (2 / -20)

Walt Dizzy

Ars Scholae Palatinae
645
Subscriptor++
Humans are possibly on track to wipe out many of the large mammals from the Earth. Including humanity itself. Along with many more vulnerable birds, reptiles, insects, and plants.

Single cell organisms? Not even a large dent. Probably a large portion of the more robust plants and creatures will survive us.
 
Upvote
32 (36 / -4)

ColdWetDog

Ars Legatus Legionis
13,336
Subscriptor++
It's going to gradually be less hospitable to us, but life is going to find a way to survive for a while.
There will be a fair number of humans in the coming centuries, even if we manage total thermonuclear war. There just won't be much of the civilized part of living we've become accustomed to. This is a huge planet with wildly diverse and deep ecosystems.

It is still much nicer more or less the way it is now so this isn't a reason for nihilism. We could make this planet pretty much a paradise although we seem hell bent to turn it into as much of a hellscape as possible.

Sigh.
 
Upvote
29 (29 / 0)
It seems plausible that isolated microclimatological pockets might have functioned as biological arks during the catastrophe, retaining some of biological diversity over the extended period of instability. Perhaps similar to the case of Wollemia Nobilis which was found alive in isolated gorges in Australia 2 million years after the last fossil record.
Thanks for mentioning this tree.

I went to Wikipedia after reading your comment. Wollemia Nobilis has been called a “living fossil” and was only discovered in 1994 by a hiker. It’s the only tree in the newly defined genus, Wollemia, that’s tens of millions of years old.

Wollemia Nobilis

Wollemia sounds like a very hardy tree. New Wollemia have now been planted around the world and are thriving in temperatures from 10 to 113 degrees Fahrenheit. Some of the wild trees are over 500 years old. One is 131 feet tall.

It’s interesting that Aboriginal Australians don’t appear to know about the tree which suggests it’s been rare for at least several generations.

This resilience leads me to wonder why and when it became so rare (60 individuals) and endangered before it was even discovered a few years ago. I’m interested in others’ thoughts on this.
 
Upvote
23 (23 / 0)

Castellum Excors

Ars Praetorian
534
Subscriptor++
Life is tenacious. Unless this planet was scoured clean down to pure rock without an atmosphere, some form of life will rebound. It appears the extinction level events purged out the old growth and made way for new growth to flourish, much like a forest fire decimates its environment but paves way for new life to blossom - in time.
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)

Veritas super omens

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,491
Subscriptor++
Life is tenacious. Unless this planet was scoured clean down to pure rock without an atmosphere, some form of life will rebound. It appears the extinction level events purged out the old growth and made way for new growth to flourish, much like a forest fire decimates its environment but paves way for new life to blossom - in time.
There is life in the rocks several kilometers underground. So absent a planet killer impact that melts the entire surface to very very deep life will continue. But the activities of humans on the surface currently is almost certainly going to cause a huge reduction in species numbers and also of population numbers in the current well established biome.
 
Upvote
8 (8 / 0)

ColdWetDog

Ars Legatus Legionis
13,336
Subscriptor++
Life is tenacious. Unless this planet was scoured clean down to pure rock without an atmosphere, some form of life will rebound. It appears the extinction level events purged out the old growth and made way for new growth to flourish, much like a forest fire decimates its environment but paves way for new life to blossom - in time.
Yes, extinctions (and climate / other factors) open up ecologic niches where competition is lower (or at least changed) allowing other organisms to move in and potentially allowing changes afforded by genetic events to better survive in the new environment. Been happening ever since it started.
 
Upvote
8 (8 / 0)

xPutNameHerex

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
162
Semi-related, and not an "oasis" it came back from, but I still was amazed when I learned that the Great Pyramids of Giza (constructed 2600 BCE) are older than the last of the woolly mammoths (finally went extinct ~2000 BCE after thousands of years in remote Artic islands). Life is incredibly tenacious.
 
Upvote
10 (10 / 0)

silverboy

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,368
Subscriptor++
Humans are possibly on track to wipe out many of the large mammals from the Earth. Including humanity itself. Along with many more vulnerable birds, reptiles, insects, and plants.

Single cell organisms? Not even a large dent. Probably a large portion of the more robust plants and creatures will survive us.
The Earth belongs to the bacteria. Always has and always will.

For this, nowadays, I am truly thankful.
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)

silverboy

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,368
Subscriptor++
Don't worry, RFK is on the job.
My feeling is that humanity is committing suicide as a species. Global warming = gun loading, along with other similar trends. And the trigger is being squeezed right now, particularly in the middle of the North American continent.

Some people are nice, it's too bad. But in the end we are a parasitical infestation on the planet, and when we're gone, the planet and its other inhabitants will be much better off.

At least we are ectoparasites. No scolax necessary. I take a little comfort in that.
 
Upvote
-4 (1 / -5)

Vnend

Ars Praetorian
437
Subscriptor++
"Refugia", please. It burns.

Yeah, I was going to make a similar comment. If you are going to use a word that survives in
scientific use, go ahead and use the proper plural.

On the other hand, I'd never read 'refugium' in that specific, scientific context, so thanks to
(I suspect) the original article's authors for the use of the surviving relic in context.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

chienandalusia

Ars Centurion
307
Subscriptor++
This brought to mind a great Nova episode from almost 2 decades ago (yikes!) about a different time period and location in China, whence many/most of our modern ornamental flowering plant species originate, being sheltered through ice ages and whatnot.

There doesn't seem to be an official streaming link (First Flower S35.E5), but you can find the transcript and other ancillary materials on the Nova page with links to purchase. (Though, you can find non-official versions to stream with little effort...)
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)
Life on land flourished only 75,000 years after the End-Permian Mass Extinction, so life really does find a way.
Life, uh, doesn't find a way - that is what extinction means. 99.9 % of all lineages have gone extinct during Earth's history.

The evolutionary process is fecund and diversifying, so life as such is unlikely to be wiped out at any given moment, but that is another property.

Yes, extinctions (and climate / other factors) open up ecologic niches where competition is lower (or at least changed) allowing other organisms to move in and potentially allowing changes afforded by genetic events to better survive in the new environment.
We have been losing deep diversity in the mass extinctions, ever since the Cambrian for animals and during the Great Oxygenation Event - the largest mass extinction, with an estimated 99 % of lineages gone - for unicellular lifeforms.

Mass extinctions are not beneficial, kind of like diseases.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)