Except, as Google may or may not learn, you can’t buy out institutional knowledge.At least Google's doing voluntary buyouts in specific divisions (and will actually pay).
No it's about rich people's commercial real estate holdings and reducing headcount. These decisions are being made in the C suite and by boards, not by middle managers who like to micromanage their underlings.It is not about productivity, it is about control.
The company likely could save millions, keeping their employees working from home. They would not need to pay for internet, phone, electric, heating, cooling, general maintenance, and the list goes on and on.
But your boss, and their boss, are not looking over your shoulder and micromanaging you while you are at home. Nothing will ever convince me this is about productivity and better business management.
Yes. Exactly. Unlike layoffs, though, employees who quit over this will do so voluntarily and be ineligible for unemployment benefits, which saves the company money on their unemployment insurance premiums.They're risking nothing. This is just layoffs by another name.
Bold of you to presume the board of directors and the CEO does not micromanage.No it's about rich people's commercial real estate holdings and reducing headcount. These decisions are being made in the C suite and by boards, not by middle managers who like to micromanage their underlings.
"What we're finding is that for all the technology in the world, nothing is faster than the speed of human interaction,” Dell wrote, per Business Insider. "A thirty-second conversation can replace an email back-and-forth that goes on for hours or even days."
Worst of all, these people see Musk as someone to emulate.Bold of you to presume the board of directors and the CEO does not micromanage.
For example, have you seen Elon Musk?
Dell wrote, per Business Insider. "A thirty-second conversation can replace an email back-and-forth that goes on for hours or even days."
I would tend to agree. Micromanaging is such hard work. Reducing headcount and justifying real estate is the driver.No it's about rich people's commercial real estate holdings and reducing headcount. These decisions are being made in the C suite and by boards, not by middle managers who like to micromanage their underlings.
For a tech company, they’re woefully behind the times. Have they tried telephony?Ok, then call me on Slack, Zoom, Meets or whatever you are using in your company.
Only that he does not hide the fact. Upper management has always been this way, but passive-aggressive. Someone like Elon Musk inspires them not to hide their true nature.Worst of all, these people see Musk as someone to emulate.
Michael Dell said:"A thirty-second conversation can replace an email back-and-forth that goes on for hours or even days."
Insecure men: the cause of 99.99% of the world’s problems throughout history.They know that and don't care. They have such disdain for workers that this is on purpose. This is all "punishment" for daring to ask for higher wagers in a free market that would bear it.
Their plan is to augment or replace programmers with AI. It doesn't matter if it won't work, they've convinced themselves it will. If they allowed themselves to think AI won't pan out and that they've just culled an irreplaceable part of their workforce, well, they'd feel pretty dumb, wouldn't they?
And execs are ASTONISHINGLY insecure and HAAAAATE feeling stupid. They will destroy destroy destroy and pull everything around down into the fire with them just to avoid anything that makes them feel not like a big supersmart executive man.
Never forget how much these people are driven by childish feelings. Do not let them convince you they're making some scientific, data driven decisions.
Remember Amazon, one of the most data driven companies in the world, flat out saying, "we don't have data to show RTO is better, but we know it's true."
ALWAYS push back on "data driven" corporate drivel. Their "data" is either hilariously low quality or doesn't exist at all. There's a reason it never gets shared with the rest of the company.
I wish to address the argument, rather than the misdirection.
Seemingly no CEO, has ever heard of a phone call. A 30 second conversation can be had over Cell, Slack, Skype, Facetime, etc. Pick your option.
There is also text messaging. Maybe these companies should invest in technology more advanced than email? Perhaps the problem is a complete and utter disregard for their employees?
Oh, wait.
If I had a dollar for every meeting I have to sit through, but it's my most productive time, so let them drone on and on, while I do some real work.How many meetings do you sit in at home, doing actual work in the background while someone drones on and on about something that doesn't even have anything to do with you?
Say goodbye to all of that.
why weren't legislators working on this for the past 4 years when they had the opportunity? Seems no one is fighting for the worker anymoreFiled under “D” for Duh.
Fuck I hate how the bean counters and dudes with massive golden parachutes strapped to their backs have been using RTO policies as soft layoffs, seemingly in part to dance around rules that were put in place to protect workers against mass layoffs.
Definitely not going to get any traction on legislation to correct for this type of behavior either, especially with the current administration doing the same thing with our federal work force.
Musk is a Johnny-come-lately; the main influencer on bigco CEOs is still Jack Welch.Worst of all, these people see Musk as someone to emulate.