Germ theory denialist Facebook group went from 147 members in April 2020 to 18.4K now.
Read the whole story
Read the whole story
This stuff is all crazy and idiotic and followers should be called out on it actively. But nonsense about gods, lords, ghosts and afterlives - every bit as moronic and irrational - is all fine and to be respected; certainly never called "utterly idiotic and abhorrent" on a fairly serious website?
Now watch this comment get well downvoted. Because people are quick to call out others' stupidity while ignoring their own.
What next, a group that rejects gravity?
I would imagine that not very many of the group members actually believe this - there are lots of trolls on the internet. This is the sort of thing the /b-tards used to do all the time, and perhaps there are less visible groups now engaged in the same sort of pranks.
This smells like propaganda. It's almost too stupid to have manifested organically.
No. It's all lies, from top to bottom. Even the stuff that might be factually correct (by accident) is framed in the wrong context and therefore wrong.Is there anything but misinformation inFacebooks monitors constantly for misinformationthisFacebookgroup?
"Terrain model"? That's ridiculous. Everyone knows that disease is caused by an imbalance of the four humors. All we need is more leeches.
/s
While we all agree that this type of thing is wrong I have come to a different conclusion than Beth. I don't believe that being so dismissive of these people is the correct approach, I prefer to understand how and why they came to the conclusion that this is correct instead of what hundreds of years of science says.
Whether this is a type of mental illness or just a some sort of mass hysteria that is occurring we need to understand what is going on and how we can address it
What next, a group that rejects gravity?
While we all agree that this type of thing is wrong I have come to a different conclusion than Beth. I don't believe that being so dismissive of these people is the correct approach, I prefer to understand how and why they came to the conclusion that this is correct instead of what hundreds of years of science says.
Whether this is a type of mental illness or just a some sort of mass hysteria that is occurring we need to understand what is going on and how we can address it
In Bernard and Béchamp's defense, they were reacting to a new theory. Pasteur's work was revolutionary and overthrew centuries of classical medical theory on disease causation. The germ theory didn't gain general acceptance in the scientific and medical communities for another couple of decades, largely due to Pasteur's and Koch's work. Joseph Lister applied germ theory to wound care by treating wounds with carbolic acid solutions and created antiseptic surgery in 1865 but that didn't entirely convince the medical community. A story I was told, possibly apocryphal, was that when John Shaw Billings was designing the new, modern hospital at Johns Hopkins in the 1880s he had the basement asphalted just in case miasmatic theory wasn't entirely disproven by the germ theory.
By creating and following diets, humans not only eat to stay alive, but they fit themselves into a cultural edifice that is larger, and more permanent, than their bodies. It is a sort of immortality ritual, and rituals must be performed socially. Clean eating rarely, if ever, occurs in secret. If you haven’t evangelized about it, joined a movement around it, or been praised publicly for it, have you truly cleansed?
This is why arguments about diet get so vicious, so quickly. You are not merely disputing facts, you are pitting your wild gamble to avoid death against someone else’s. You are poking at their life raft. But if their diet proves to be the One True Diet, yours must not be. If they are right, you are wrong. This is why diet culture seems so religious. People adhere to a dietary faith in the hope they will be saved. That if they’re good enough, pure enough in their eating, they can keep illness and mortality at bay. And the pursuit of life everlasting always requires a leap of faith.
This stuff is all crazy and idiotic and followers should be called out on it actively.
Now watch this comment get well downvoted. Because people are quick to call out others' stupidity while ignoring their own.
What next, a group that rejects gravity?
Gravity is just a theory.
As a microbiology major, I'm simply... speechless.
Intelligent fallingWhat next, a group that rejects gravity?
Which version? Einstein's or Newton's?What next, a group that rejects gravity?
Gravity is just a theory.
Au contraire! It isn't just a nice theory.
It's the Law.
Thou must not drink ye water, for it shall put thy humors out of balance and thou shalt become ill, even unto death. Drink ye ale and purify thy soul."Terrain model"? That's ridiculous. Everyone knows that disease is caused by an imbalance of the four humors. All we need is more leeches.
/s
The Supersizers explored humors:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oH5O_fCstyI
I love this series. They're all available on YouTube, but they're in the old 10-minute-limit format, but autoplay normally picks up the next in sequence.
While we all agree that this type of thing is wrong I have come to a different conclusion than Beth. I don't believe that being so dismissive of these people is the correct approach, I prefer to understand how and why they came to the conclusion that this is correct instead of what hundreds of years of science says.
Whether this is a type of mental illness or just a some sort of mass hysteria that is occurring we need to understand what is going on and how we can address it
And here I was, thinking that flat-earthers are the bottom of the barrel...
I don't want to live on this planet any more.
Well not exactly gravity (but there are examples of that too), but here's some folks who, among all the other moon conspiracies, assert that rockets cannot function in a vacuum.What next, a group that rejects gravity?
I had it as a slightly older kid, I was a bit sick but I don't remember it as particularly bad however my dad caught it too and he'd never had it as a child so he got really, really sick for weeks. We still deal with in the same way here in Norway, they vaccinate against measles, mumps and rubina but not chickenpox. (Also rota virus, tuberculosis, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, meningitis, hepatitis b, pneumococcal vaccine and HPV)In the 1960s a vaccine for chickenpox was decades away. It wasn't a question of "if" you would get chickenpox at some point in your life, but "when". Your parents getting it over with on their own terms when they were prepared to deal with it made perfect sense. That's especially true since the older you are when you get chickenpox the worse it is likely to be.
There are a lot of restrictions on food labelling in the UK though. You can claim a foodstuff is 'healthy', which is essentially meaningless, but not that it will prevent or cure disease.Why the hell hasn’t Facebook taken the whole group down yet?
Why does Facebook do or not do anything? Money. I'm sure gullible people have amazing click-through rates on ads. Someone diving down a flat earth/Q-anon/elites are lizard people/breathing is a myth rabbit hole wracks up loads of ad impressions. Toxic stupidity sells.
Because this is just an extreme arm of a very, very profitable market that existed long before Facebook; Wellness.
I could go into a long rant but if you look at a lot of the anti-vax conspiracy theories they all stem from Western “Alternative Medicine” groups that make money from demonising Western medicine to sell a lifestyle based off “Ancient Eastern Medicine”.
Until we start regulating the Wellness market like we do actual medicines they’ll always have the advertising spend that means companies like Facebook will turn a blind eye.
Not disagreeing but we're not all that good at regulating 'actual medicines'. Witness the latest Alzheimer's drug. And, unfortunately, that wasn't all that unique. What the US really needs is a top down revamp of the FDA and a revamp of the enabling legislation. Of course the likelihood of that happening is kinda low.
But at least they are regulated. I’m British but I believe our agencies operate in a similar enough fashion for this. Wellness products circumnavigate regulations because they are classed as food, therefore they don’t have to prove anything other than the actual products aren’t unsafe as a food source.
Not at all. Cancer is human cells, not bacteria.Meanwhile, Béchamp—considered a bitter crank and rival of Pasteur—suggested that pathogenic bacteria are produced by human tissue as a response to a harmful change in the terrain.
Actually, this isn't so off the wall: it more or less describes cancer.
There's probably an element of that psychology on some people dieting, but dieting came about because our bodies crave sugar, salt, and fat, and our industrial societies have made those plentiful and cheap, while often separating them from all other nutrients, and also promoting a more sedentary lifestyle than ever before (sit to travel, sit to work, etc.). Our bodies have evolved to store all excess energy due to the previous likelihood of going some days without food, and our society has changed quicker than our bodies can genetically adapt to.Here is an article describing an idea that I think is directly relevant:
Eating Toward Immortality: Diet culture is just another way of dealing with the fear of death.
The basic premise is, diet is a thing you can control. If only you're good enough, and pure enough, then surely you won't die. It's in its own way a variant of anorexia, a similar way to take control over life when you have no control.
This stuff is all crazy and idiotic and followers should be called out on it actively. But nonsense about gods, lords, ghosts and afterlives - every bit as moronic and irrational - is all fine and to be respected; certainly never called "utterly idiotic and abhorrent" on a fairly serious website?
Now watch this comment get well downvoted. Because people are quick to call out others' stupidity while ignoring their own.
It's incredibly off the wall. It's basically Spontaneous Generation, which was not entirely discredited at the time (especially for a contemporary who hated Pasteur's debunking of it).Meanwhile, Béchamp—considered a bitter crank and rival of Pasteur—suggested that pathogenic bacteria are produced by human tissue as a response to a harmful change in the terrain.
Actually, this isn't so off the wall: it more or less describes cancer.