Big brands are spending small sums on X to stay out of Musk’s crosshairs

Kazper

Ars Praefectus
4,189
Subscriptor
with, maybe, the exception of small, local businesses, it's probably safe to assume that all companies are comfortable with advertising in a virtual nazi convention, especially if it saves them a bunch of money. and i don't know how feasible it is to boycott every single big name in the market, but one could always try...
I doubt this is correct since Musk is still sueing some companies - so presumably those are holding firm on not returning.
 
Upvote
13 (13 / 0)

the cave troll

Ars Scholae Palatinae
997
Subscriptor++
I'd argue it's not spinelessness, but rather looking out for the businesses - businesses that employ thousands, whom would be out of their job if fElonia Muskovic decided to go on a rant about them. So it makes sense to do the bare minimum.

Of course as a person I do not agree with this, but I do see the intention behind it. I'm all for boycotting each and every single business Mr CyberGut has his fingers in, but as a business, you often have to take into account the wellbeing of your employees, and the future of the business itself, before you can consider such morality.

The problem, though, is that appeasement is not a good long-term strategy. Sure, this time this business might be to stay out of the crosshairs at a relatively low cost, but that does not mean that this will be the last time it is put in this position, or that the cost will always be so low.
 
Upvote
26 (26 / 0)

linnen

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,684
Subscriptor
Surely if I give the bully my lunch money today, he won't take even more tomorrow.
Probably a mistake to make this fact public. If you're making minor spends to appease an asshole, and the asshole figures out that's what you're doing then you'll need to increase again to keep appeasing him.

Not spending enough will become the next "illegal boycott" and that will keep compounding over and over again for the next four years.

As Kipling's 'Dane-geld' poem put it
It is always a temptation for a rich and lazy nation,
To puff and look important and to say:–
"Though we know we should defeat you,
we have not the time to meet you.
We will therefore pay you cash to go away."

And that is called paying the Dane-geld;
But we've proved it again and again,
That if once you have paid him the Dane-geld
You never get rid of the Dane.
 
Upvote
26 (26 / 0)

Steven N

Ars Scholae Palatinae
968
Sigh, and once more integrity and values are being sacrificed on the altar of The Stock Value...
It even goes as far as the Trump administration sending threat letters to remove references to DEI programs to European companies, and the motherfuckers actually complying.

I was already boycotting US products and companies (up to Coca-Cola and Dominos) but now I am also considering getting rid of all my US based stocks even if it means losing quite a lot Euro's that I wanted to invest in making my house more environmental-friendly.
 
Upvote
11 (11 / 0)

Unsure platypus

Smack-Fu Master, in training
2
I think it is really important to call out the purchase of Twitter by Elons company Xai. It is really self dealing and likely money laundering.
Step 1. Overpay for a social media platform.
Step 2. Destroy user base
Step 3. Destroy add Base
Step 4. Sell company to other company that you control when your collateral reduces in value to avoid being forced to sell you stock and get hit with taxes. This is self dealing and a functioning SEC, FTC, FCC, and a bunch of other 3 letter gov agencies would likely have some issues with it.
Step 4 a. Overpay(again) to pay off outstanding debts to those that loaned you secured money
Step 4 b. Replace loans with unsecured loans at a company that has no revenue or business model(this is likely money laundering, but I am not a forensic accountant)
Step 5. Profit????
I have been on Ars for more than a decade and this made me get an account to have this discussion.
 
Upvote
33 (34 / -1)

Aurich

Director of Many Things
37,884
Ars Staff
A better term, I think, is Politico's Great Grovel. It really tells you what is going on.

Basically, businesses are happy being transactional as long as it, you know, favors their bottom line. Principals, laws, higher intellectual and moral scriptures - that's all bullshit and DEI and so 20th Century.
That's a good piece, in that it's not new information but it rounds it all up in one place to really paint the picture.

I'd sum it up, in relation to this story, as this:

1) Watch out for number one

2) Comply in advance

3) Fold instead of fight

Everyone is trying to avoid Sauron's Eye. They all see an existential crisis, to their existence, to their bottom line. And they're all thinking of just themselves, and unwilling to all resist together.

So they're being picked off.
 
Upvote
47 (47 / 0)
We allowed them far too much power. I exited all the easy stuff (X, FB, Wahtsapp ...) but I find it more difficult to leave macOS (or Windows), iOS (or Google Android). I didn't find an acceptable alternative but we will need one (or several), and sooner will be better.
2025: Finally the Year of Linux (because of MS and Apple appeasement to Chairman Musk)
 
Upvote
10 (11 / -1)

xPutNameHerex

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
165
I haven't visited X in several months. Is it still overrun with MAGA cultists and neonazis?
If you make a blank account and give them no info (so before they learn your habits), the default feed is full of alt-right provocateurs, admitted fascists, white supremacists, and actual Nazis.

And that's not even counting Elon (who is of course all of those), but made sure not one but two of the first posts you see are his (even on refresh).

There was one basketball post to break it up...of course, it was of a major fight that happened last night and not about the sport itself.
 
Upvote
12 (13 / -1)

PhaseShifter

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,940
Subscriptor++
I think it is really important to call out the purchase of Twitter by Elons company Xai. It is really self dealing and likely money laundering.
Step 1. Overpay for a social media platform.
Step 2. Destroy user base
Step 3. Destroy add Base
Step 4. Sell company to other company that you control when your collateral reduces in value to avoid being forced to sell you stock and get hit with taxes. This is self dealing and a functioning SEC, FTC, FCC, and a bunch of other 3 letter gov agencies would likely have some issues with it.
Step 4 a. Overpay(again) to pay off outstanding debts to those that loaned you secured money
Step 4 b. Replace loans with unsecured loans at a company that has no revenue or business model(this is likely money laundering, but I am not a forensic accountant)
Step 5. Profit????
I have been on Ars for more than a decade and this made me get an account to have this discussion.
You left out step 3.5:
3.5a. Convince an autocrat that you can make the government more efficient for him.
3.5b. Gut the regulatory agencies that would oversee any investigations into shady business practices.
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

Sajuuk

Ars Legatus Legionis
10,887
Subscriptor++
What remained of market Capitalism is now over. Rackets and thugs will determine income and more importantly capital flows. The Russian system has been adopted. Russia won. It's over for capitalism
Consolidation is the very bread and butter of Capitalism, and oligarchy is its natural form.
 
Upvote
16 (16 / 0)

HiroTheProtagonist

Ars Praefectus
5,875
Subscriptor++
If you make a blank account and give them no info (so before they learn your habits), the default feed is full of alt-right provocateurs, admitted fascists, white supremacists, and actual Nazis.

And that's not even counting Elon (who is of course all of those), but made sure not one but two of the first posts you see are his (even on refresh).

There was one basketball post to break it up...of course, it was of a major fight that happened last night and not about the sport itself.
I deleted my account a while back, but even if you specifically followed left-wing accounts and put effort into blocking the fascist bullshit, they'd still inject right-wing reactionary horseshit into your feed. I think the post that really drove home just how bad things have gotten was a Lost Causer claiming that taking down Confederate statues was tantamount to treason and that anyone who engages in it should be hanged, followed by about a thousand replies enthusiastically agreeing and at least a couple doxx posts.

That said, it also appeared that pretty much nobody significant was advertising on X besides McDonalds. Otherwise, nothing but wall-to-wall ads for reactionary literature, gold coins and crypto scams.
 
Upvote
15 (16 / -1)

Zeroumus

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,703
Fuck all these invertebrates sucking up to Musk. I'm cutting as many of them out of my life as possible. I would cut them all out, but I can't grow my own food or make my own clothes.

I have been over the last few months really cutting these asholes out of my life.

Amazon.. gone
Netflix . Gone
Mcdonalds. Gone
Face book. long gone.
Twitter.. huh . Whats that?

And while it is trendy to announc these things. all i can say is. i am really doinig these things now .
 
Upvote
16 (17 / -1)

jlredford

Ars Praetorian
501
Subscriptor
The initial boycott of Twitter came when people were able to post screenshots of ads from major corporations next to Nazi posts. That's still a risk for these companies. It would just take one diligent researcher to cause brand damage. Look at Tesla - having demonstrators outside your stores yelling at customers is a worst-case scenario. Look at Target - they caved on DEI and are being boycotted by Black customers.

So maybe the answer is to pay but not actually put anything up. Also don't admit to paying. Consider it straight protection money to the new gangster overlords.
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)

Ushio

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,100
I'd love a list, so I could avoid them as much as possible. I'm really not interested is supporting spineless companies that choose to support all the terrible things elon is doing.
Companies with humans in charge who are probably more worried about one way trips to Musk run human recycling centres than most.
 
Upvote
-2 (1 / -3)

Ushio

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,100
The initial boycott of Twitter came when people were able to post screenshots of ads from major corporations next to Nazi posts. That's still a risk for these companies. It would just take one diligent researcher to cause brand damage. Look at Tesla - having demonstrators outside your stores yelling at customers is a worst-case scenario. Look at Target - they caved on DEI and are being boycotted by Black customers.

So maybe the answer is to pay but not actually put anything up. Also don't admit to paying. Consider it straight protection money to the new gangster overlords.
Why would it matter having ads next to Nazi posts when the people voted in Nazi's who are completely upfront about being Nazi's?
 
Upvote
6 (6 / 0)

just6979

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
189
A lot of people see it as corruption/extortion, but an equal amount of people feel more powerful siding with the bully than the victim.
But they forget that they can be made the victim at any point, on the whims of a couple of transactional psychopaths in this case. It's impossible to simply "side with the bully", because the bully always still gets to choose who's "really on my side". That scale always eventually slides towards 110% loyal unthinking sycophants, aka henchmen, but even they're not completely safe. They may need to made to go away, either for the bully to save face by disassociation, or because they've become a perceived threat to the bully's power.

Might feel more powerful in the moment, but not looking forward to the eventual outcome is pretty lazy, and not truly powerful.
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)

just6979

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
189
American corps should do something about the corruption they helped bring about...
Will never happen, will never even be considered, until that corruption directly impacts their bottom lines. Short-term profit and impossibly continual growth goes above anything else (including morals) in this end-game unfettered "capitalism" (in quotes because of said corruption: it's so far removed from a truly free market that it really isn't capitalism anymore).
 
Upvote
6 (6 / 0)
Well then you should stop reading ARS because Conde Nast very much has a presence on X.

Or - cool it with the kneejerk boycott reactions.
Not wanting to support X is a kneejerk reaction?

You know what's a kneejerk reaction? Throwing a fit when someone criticizes the billionaire that you worship. Get a fucking life of your own.
 
Upvote
23 (24 / -1)