Apple pulls data protection tool instead of caving to UK demand for a backdoor

FerociousLabRetriever

Ars Praetorian
434
Subscriptor
I keep hoping this fracking timeline won’t get any worse than it already is and then… Sigh!!!

It really is true that things can always get worse. 😞

We have just experienced a decades-long golden age characterized by the longest period of peace between world powers, rapid globalization that lifted billions out of poverty, numerous technological innovations that made life less difficult, and increasing life expectancy. Believe it or not, we have just lived through the best time in human history by virtually every metric. Unfortunately, not everyone had the opportunity to participate, and those same individuals will be the most adversely affected as we regress.

From this peak, things can worsen significantly, unimaginatively worse, and it appears that there is a group of powerful individuals aiming to pull us back to 1850 in almost every way. It's a long way down. People are about to receive a painful education as we lose everything we took for granted.
 
Upvote
303 (308 / -5)

NoNeeeed

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
143
Subscriptor++
As a UK resident I fully support Apple here. More incompetence from the Labour government (and I speak as a Labour voter).
In fairness, the same nonsense has come from all the main parties about installing backdoors in things. They are all equally clueless on this stuff. This is just the first time that it's got this far.
 
Upvote
144 (145 / -1)

habilain

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
102
As a UK resident I fully support Apple here. More incompetence from the Labour government (and I speak as a Labour voter).
Worth pointing out for those not familiar with the matter: the law in question is the UK Investigatory Powers Act (2016). It's a law that was passed under the previous Conservative government, but with support from all the major parties in the UK, including Labour.

It basically comes from none of our MPs understanding how encryption works, and that it's not possible to backdoor maths for the purposes of "national security". We need more technically minded people in politics, although that's hardly likely to happen.
 
Upvote
258 (259 / -1)

julesverne

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,154
Labor under Keir Starmer has been a thorough disappointment. After the shit-show of the former Conservative goverment(s), there were hopes that Starmer would right the ship. Instead he has cozied up to Trump like no other in Europe except Orban, suspended MPs opposing the two child benefit cap(which will increase child poverty), hypocritically accepted gifts from party donors(including expensive clothes for his wife), etc. The demand to disable encryption is the opposite of what I'd expect from a former human rights lawyer.

Edit: I know this edit is not the norm, but I'd like to hear from those downvoting my comment. Post a counter take. I am curious.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
61 (83 / -22)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
What remains now is for Apple to create Time Machine for iOS, so that we can easily make complete backups directly to our own NAS, without needing a Mac or PC.
Right now you can backup your idevice in encrypted form either in iCloud or on your Mac. iPhone backups on your Mac are normal data that will be backed up with Time Machine, and can be encrypted in Time Machine like any other data, and nobody including apple has any access.
 
Upvote
124 (124 / 0)

theSeb

Ars Praefectus
4,487
Subscriptor
I don't understand how turning off end to end encryption is a better solution. Now the UK can get the data they wanted (along with a lot of other folks), plus it's a signal to other countries they can just pressure Apple to turn off encryption in their countries too.
It’s a better solution for everybody else
 
Upvote
100 (101 / -1)
I don't understand how turning off end to end encryption is a better solution. Now the UK can get the data they wanted (along with a lot of other folks), plus it's a signal to other countries they can just pressure Apple to turn off encryption in their countries too.
You don't understand how it's a better solution... compared to what? Do you think Apple can win out against the UK government? In a matter of what the UK claims is national security?

Apple's choices were to either A) build a backdoor into encryption, or B) disable the encryption. There is no third option. They chose the better one of two.
 
Upvote
192 (194 / -2)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
I don't understand how turning off end to end encryption is a better solution. Now the UK can get the data they wanted (along with a lot of other folks), plus it's a signal to other countries they can just pressure Apple to turn off encryption in their countries too.
Apple had to turn off end-to-end encryption. The only difference is that they had to turn it off and lie to their customers. So Apple says “we won’t be lying to our customers, and the customers can complain to their government”.

So other countries can force Apple as well, but their voters will know.
 
Upvote
178 (178 / 0)

NickN

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,733
I don't understand how turning off end to end encryption is a better solution. Now the UK can get the data they wanted (along with a lot of other folks), plus it's a signal to other countries they can just pressure Apple to turn off encryption in their countries too.
iCloud is still end-to-end encrypted, it's just a question of where the "end" is. Without ADP, iCloud data is encrypted but Apple has the key. This is useful for people who aren't good at managing their own keys and want Apple to restore their data when they lose the keys. When you enable ADP, you're telling Apple you want to manage your own keys and you don't want them to keep a copy.
 
Upvote
55 (60 / -5)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

passivesmoking

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,896
Labor under Keir Starmer has been a thorough disappointment. After the shit-show of the former Conservative goverment(s), there were hopes that Starmer would right the ship. Instead he has cozied up to Trump like no other in Europe except Orban, suspended MPs opposing the two child benefit cap(which will increase child poverty), hypocritically accepted gifts from party donors(including expensive clothes for his wife), etc. The demand to disable encryption is the opposite of what I'd expect from a former human rights lawyer.
He's also continued with the previous administration's demonisation of migrants (whether economic or asylum seekers) and their characterisation of disabled people as shiftless lazy burdens on society who don't deserve all the benefits they get.

He's basically a tory in a red tie. What a freaking disappointment from someone who was once a human-rights lawyer.
 
Upvote
35 (48 / -13)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

vonduck

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,089
As a UK resident I fully support Apple here. More incompetence from the Labour government (and I speak as a Labour voter).
nothing to do with parties. every party barring the odd mps are in favour.

the question becomes, does this apply to everyone who enters uk? and how many visitors will not turn up because of this?

do certain (foreign/international) businesses have it on mandatorily for their work phones and decide they'll simple pull the plug on doing business here?
 
Upvote
28 (29 / -1)