Not only that but kicking off the payment system will, invariably, get his doors kicked in by an FBI raid on X. It is impossible he did all the regulatory prep necessary to run a bank or payment processor.I guess Elmo really wants more attention from regulatory bodies, eh? FTC, FCC, FAA, SEC and now the FDIC! If i'm missing any please correct me. Is he going for Bingo?
We should note that the Right-wing mantra lately has been to eliminate regulations and weaken social agencies and even federal policing agencies and to attack our entire justice system while having high courts turn back the clock.I'm thinking that Musk is trying to do an end run around all the banking regs/scads of regulatory agencies with oversight of banking by just going the money transmitter route.
He's not even trying to get Xitter to be a payment processor, as the article refers him to partnering with Stripe etc.
Maybe I missed a reference in the article, but I read that Xitter is only applying for money transmitter licenses (think Western Union & such) - not for any other type of money service business activity. So, I'm wondering already how he expects customers to have accounts with balances if Xitter is just a transmitter? How can said accounts earn interest?
I think, like many of his awesome ideas, he's gonna go full speed splat against a regulatory agency or six with oversight over various financial services/the banking system that's gonna nail him with some pretty severe fines, injunctions etc. He may tantrum all he wants about how all these alphabet soup agencies are persecuting him, but the ones about financial systems have way more teeth than any other regulatory agency he has come up against previously. What's labor protections, etc compared to the dollar?
To quote: "don't fuck with the money". I think this could be a real FAFO experience for Musk.
Yep, 'cept in his version the store is all across society.This all sounds like he wants to make some sort of company town setup where you have to use the company script to buy anything.
I'm thinking that Musk is trying to do an end run around all the banking regs/scads of regulatory agencies with oversight of banking by just going the money transmitter route.
He's not even trying to get Xitter to be a payment processor, as the article refers him to partnering with Stripe etc.
Maybe I missed a reference in the article, but I read that Xitter is only applying for money transmitter licenses (think Western Union & such) - not for any other type of money service business activity. So, I'm wondering already how he expects customers to have accounts with balances if Xitter is just a transmitter? How can said accounts earn interest?
I think, like many of his awesome ideas, he's gonna go full speed splat against a regulatory agency or six with oversight over various financial services/the banking system that's gonna nail him with some pretty severe fines, injunctions etc. He may tantrum all he wants about how all these alphabet soup agencies are persecuting him, but the ones about financial systems have way more teeth than any other regulatory agency he has come up against previously. What's labor protections, etc compared to the dollar?
To quote: "don't fuck with the money". I think this could be a real FAFO experience for Musk.
Yes. But this is about money. Not people's rights or the environment or something. The Right-Wing totes wants to scrap the EPA completely (defanging it isn't enough), CFPB, NLRB, etc etc.We should note that the Right-wing mantra lately has been to eliminate regulations and weaken social agencies and even federal policing agencies and to attack our entire justice system while having high courts turn back the clock.
It's all part of the New Feudalism they're lusting to enable. In their nirvana nation-states as we know them today would cease to exist. Musk continually baits regulatory agencies and this will be another scheme to get his worshipers to give away what freedoms they have left.
So it looks like the USA will finally join the rest of the world in electronic banking.Actually what Musk is likely to go full speed splat against is FedNow. Once that really gets rolled out, payment processors like Venmo or whatever Musk wants X to be are going to be toast. The funny part is that Musk probably doesn't even see this one coming.
Belanger has moments of editorializing weirdly. It strikes me as tech bro apologia."Launching payment services is arguably one of the reasons why Musk paid so much to acquire Twitter in 2022...."
No it's not.
How the fuck do they even plan KYC compliance? You're going to upload your passport to TwiX? That's legitimate insanity.Not only that but kicking off the payment system will, invariably, get his doors kicked in by an FBI raid on X. It is impossible he did all the regulatory prep necessary to run a bank or payment processor.
I can't wait.
Money means power. I didn't say their magic land made sense. Have you listened to the MAGA nutcases in congress and across society? Their stands on all kinds of issues will eventually lead to money draining from the very places they acquire it. When people's rights (See:Abortion) get threatened, they vote with their wallets.Yes. But this is about money. Not people's rights or the environment or something. The Right-Wing totes wants to scrap the EPA completely (defanging it isn't enough), CFPB, NLRB, etc etc.
But their billionaire masters wants a stable financial system. And a lot of regs over how money is handled are also derived from Patriot Act/Homeland Security Act clauses re money laundering for cartels & terrorists. So, even the most Randian Libertarian RWer doesn't want to mess with the the agencies with this oversight, they're fully in support of them due to their authortarian instincts & desire to control the financial system.
I think Musk doesn't really grok (intended) the difference between new targets his stans will cheer on and the targets he should back away from. Yet another example of overweening narcissim affecting the narcisist's survival instincts.
Doing that would be eye opening into how X with its shoestring staff plans to deal with PII and other critical aspects of data security.How the fuck do they even plan KYC compliance? You're going to upload your passport to TwiX? That's legitimate insanity.
As I pointed out in my followup post, he clearly regretted his decision and describing it as if he had a plan strikes me as after the fact rationalization.Belanger has moments of editorializing weirdly. It strikes me as tech bro apologia.
You're missing FDA for Neuralink .I guess Elmo really wants more attention from regulatory bodies, eh? FTC, FCC, FAA, SEC and now the FDIC! If i'm missing any please correct me. Is he going for Bingo?
He needs to spin up a raw milk startup called MilX so we can get the USDA in on the action. BATFE? Dept of Ed? HUD / HHS should already be getting in on his attempt to retrofit the TwiX building into a prison / dormitory.You're missing FDA for Neuralink .
Payment providers like Stripe and Adyen have already partnered with X to process its transactions,
Or simply that it's Venmo for NazisI'm not sure why anyone would want to use a payment system lashed together in hardly any time whatsoever, run by someone as unreliable as Musk... Given that he's apparently shameless about appropriating company resources for his own reasons, what's to say he won't help himself to customer deposits?
If anyone does use it - well, caveat emptor applies.
Americans I've talked to think it's magic that I can just send someone money with an email/phone number and it just goes into their bank account immediately.So it looks like the USA will finally join the rest of the world in electronic banking.
Most of Europe has had easy electronic transmission of funds for years. In Australia I can send money to anyone if they give me their "PayID" (email or mobile phone number) without using a 3rd party product like Venmo.
The pony express speed of transactions in the USA has allowed the rise of 3rd party FinTech products that allow people to transfer money quickly. So maybe this might work in the USA - the rest of the world - maybe not.
The continued success of the apparent ponzi scheme depends on funds being rarely withdrawn. It's the run on the fund that crashes them when the hoi polloi figure out they've been had."To make sure that users keep their money stashed on the platform, Musk plans to offer "extremely high yield" savings accounts that X Payments' chief information security officer, Chris Stanley, teased in April would basically guarantee that funds are rarely withdrawn from X."
This is literally the promise of every single Ponzi scheme.
Seems like the opposite approach to the one espoused by Tim Berners-Lee, of open-source Pods that can be used to limit your exposure to data breaches and keep control over your data.There’s a deeply dysfunctional and incorrect idea at the core of Musk’s concept of X-as-a-bank— the notion that all of a person’s financial data and resources should be in one place.
No, it's not. If it was why did he never mention this payments plan until long after he was forced to honor his contract buy Twitter? If it was his plan all along why did he try to back out of the Twitter purchase to begin with?Yes, it actually is. He's always wanted X, the "everything app," ever since he heard about WeChat and its stranglehold on Chinese citizens. He tried to do it with PayPal, but the board there saw how nuts that was and kicked him out. He thinks he can do it with Twitter, bludgeoning into his dream app where everyone is utterly reliant on him.
Brain the size of a planet is multitasking, or as I call it - half-arseing everythingUhhh, Elon, didn't you just get $40+ billion dollars to work at Tesla this year?
It was even dumber. Not only are there still holdouts (Walmart and Home Depot being big ones) but I used to tap my Amex card to pay at cvs but as soon as Apple Pay came out they disabled the nfc reader.America also had Apple Pay be this weird roll out that some stores are staunchly holding out on (in favour of their own inferior systems that permit greater data collection).
Thankfully CVS re-enabled it after the competing product they signed on to imploded. I can tap to pay or use ApplePay at any CVS I've been to in my city, Austin TX, and have been able to for a while.It was even dumber. Not only are there still holdouts (Walmart and Home Depot being big ones) but I used to tap my Amex card to pay at cvs but as soon as Apple Pay came out they disabled the nfc reader.
Oh, you didn’t hear about that, huh.This all sounds like he wants to make some sort of company town setup where you have to use the company script to buy anything.
Source please. This sounds like some kind of a revisionist theory, because I don't remember that being a reason at all.Launching payment services is arguably one of the reasons why Musk paid so much to acquire Twitter in 2022.
I prefer trusting companies with a history of honoring their financial obligations as well. I also prefer companies that don’t pick on individual customers to screw over when considering where to make use of financial services.I prefer more stable websites to trust my money with.
First, I’m not sure wtf your CISO has to do with the financial instruments your company offers except, like…keeping them safe…?“The end goal is if you ever have any incentive to take money out of our system, then we have failed,” Stanley posted on X.
It's like an EGOT, but for techbro douchebags.I guess Elmo really wants more attention from regulatory bodies, eh? FTC, FCC, FAA, SEC and now the FDIC! If i'm missing any please correct me. Is he going for Bingo?
Damn no, I didn't hear about that. Wow being a resident there does not sound attractive.
He should be careful, banking is one of the few sectors where throwing money around won't always get you out of trouble.I guess Elmo really wants more attention from regulatory bodies, eh? FTC, FCC, FAA, SEC and now the FDIC! If i'm missing any please correct me. Is he going for Bingo?
Zelle's so limited as to be mostly useless. You can use it to settle up after splitting a check, maybe, (assuming your friends' banks all subscribe) but you can't use it to pay rent or buy a used car because it's limited to $500.Zelle, which also allows sending money via a phone number or email address, has also been a thing for years and is supported by basically every major US bank and numerous smaller ones. I also can use it directly in my banking app without a 3rd party product. I've been using it to send money for 3-4 years now.
Cool story, bro?![]()