Skip to content
Musk in wartime

Musk refused Ukraine’s request to enable Starlink for drone attack [Updated]

New details on how Musk thwarted Ukraine's submarine drone attack near Crimea.

Jon Brodkin | 943
A Starlink satellite dish sits on the ground in Ukraine.
Starlink satellite dish seen on September 25, 2022, in Izyum, Kharkiv region, amid the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Credit: Getty Images | Yasuyoshi Chiba
Starlink satellite dish seen on September 25, 2022, in Izyum, Kharkiv region, amid the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Credit: Getty Images | Yasuyoshi Chiba
Story text

[Update on September 9: Author Walter Isaacson now says his book's claim that Elon Musk disabled Starlink to thwart a Ukrainian submarine drone attack is incorrect. Musk did refuse to enable Starlink in the area near Crimea, however.

"To clarify on the Starlink issue: the Ukrainians THOUGHT coverage was enabled all the way to Crimea, but it was not," Isaacson wrote. "They asked Musk to enable it for their drone sub attack on the Russian fleet. Musk did not enable it, because he thought, probably correctly, that would cause a major war."

Musk weighed in, writing, "The onus is meaningfully different if I refused to act upon a request from Ukraine vs. made a deliberate change to Starlink to thwart Ukraine. At no point did I or anyone at SpaceX promise coverage over Crimea. Moreover, our terms of service clearly prohibit Starlink for offensive military action, as we are a civilian system, so they were again asking for something that was expressly prohibited."

Musk added that "SpaceX is building Starshield for the US government, which is similar to, but much smaller than Starlink, as it will not have to handle millions of users. That system will be owned and controlled by the US government."]

[Update on September 12: According to CNN, a spokesperson for publisher Simon & Schuster said on Monday that "future editions of the book will be updated" to correct the error. Isaacson's book as published said, apparently incorrectly, that Musk "secretly told his engineers to turn off coverage within a hundred kilometers of the Crimean coast." In a post explaining the mistake, Isaacson wrote, "Based on my conversations with Musk, I mistakenly thought the policy to not allow Starlink to be used for an attack on Crimea had been first decided on the night of the Ukrainian attempted sneak attack."]

Original story: Elon Musk ordered SpaceX engineers to temporarily disable Starlink in order to thwart a Ukrainian submarine drone attack on the Russian naval fleet last year, according to a report based on a new biography of Musk. The book provides more details on a previously reported incident.

A CNN exclusive report today said, "Elon Musk secretly ordered his engineers to turn off his company's Starlink satellite communications network near the Crimean coast last year to disrupt a Ukrainian sneak attack on the Russian naval fleet, according to an excerpt adapted from Walter Isaacson's new biography of the eccentric billionaire titled 'Elon Musk.'"

"As Ukrainian submarine drones strapped with explosives approached the Russian fleet, they 'lost connectivity and washed ashore harmlessly,' Isaacson writes," the CNN report said. Ukrainian officials reportedly begged Musk to turn satellite service in the area back on.

It's said that Musk spoke with senior Russian officials and feared that Russia would respond with a nuclear attack. "Musk's decision, which left Ukrainian officials begging him to turn the satellites back on, was driven by an acute fear that Russia would respond to a Ukrainian attack on Crimea with nuclear weapons, a fear driven home by Musk's conversations with senior Russian officials, according to Isaacson," CNN wrote. Musk reportedly said he was worried about the situation becoming a "mini-Pearl Harbor."

Ukraine government official Mykhailo Fedorov reportedly "plead[ed] with Musk to restore connectivity for the submarine drones by telling Musk about their capabilities in a text message." Musk "replied that he was impressed with the design of the submarine drones but that he wouldn't turn satellite coverage back on for Crimea because Ukraine 'is now going too far and inviting strategic defeat,'" the report said.

As the dispute unfolded, "Musk was soon on the phone with President Joe Biden's national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, the chairman of the joint chiefs, Gen. Mark Milley, and the Russian ambassador to the US to address anxieties from Washington, DC, to Moscow, writes Isaacson," according to CNN.

“How am I in this war?” Musk asks

SpaceX President and COO Gwynne Shotwell confirmed in February that the company took steps to prevent Ukraine's military from using Starlink satellite Internet with drones.

"We were really pleased to be able to provide Ukraine connectivity and help them in their fight for freedom. It was never intended to be weaponized. However, Ukrainians have leveraged it in ways that were unintentional and not part of any agreement," Shotwell said at the time. Shotwell didn't provide details on how SpaceX disrupted Ukraine's use of Starlink but said, "there are things that we can do to limit their ability to do that... there are things that we can do and have done."

Musk wrote in a January 2023 tweet that "we are not allowing Starlink to be used for long-range drone strikes."

SpaceX came to Ukraine's aid when Russia invaded the country in February 2022. After the Russian invasion disrupted broadband service, Fedorov asked Musk to send Starlink terminals, and Musk quickly did so.

Within weeks, there were reports that Starlink connections helped the Ukraine military's elite drone unit target and destroy Russian tanks and other "priority targets." Starlink's terms of service say it is "not designed or intended for use with or in offensive or defensive weaponry or other comparable end-uses."

"How am I in this war?" Musk reportedly said to Isaacson during an interview for the book to be published on September 12. "Starlink was not meant to be involved in wars. It was so people can watch Netflix and chill and get online for school and do good peaceful things, not drone strikes."

In October 2022, Musk proposed a peace plan that would formally make Crimea part of Russia. The USSR transferred Crimea to Ukraine in 1954, but Russia has occupied the peninsula since 2014. Ukraine has stood firm in its demand that Russia withdraw from Crimea, while the Kremlin demands that Crimea be recognized as Russian territory.

Musk fought with Pentagon over Starlink funding

Musk had a dispute with the Pentagon late last year over who should fund Ukraine's use of Starlink. Musk initially said that SpaceX "cannot fund the existing system indefinitely" and continue to send additional terminals but later wrote, "The hell with it … even though Starlink is still losing money & other companies are getting billions of taxpayer $, we'll just keep funding Ukraine govt for free."

Shotwell was angry about Musk's decision to pull the request for funding. "The Pentagon had a $145 million check ready to hand to me, literally," Isaacson's book quotes Shotwell as saying. "Then Elon succumbed to the bullshit on Twitter and to the haters at the Pentagon who leaked the story."

SpaceX and the US ended up working out a deal anyway. The US Defense Department recently confirmed that it is paying for Starlink satellite broadband service in Ukraine. Deals with the US and European governments struck in early 2023 would result in Ukraine getting another 100,000 Starlink dishes, according to the CNN report on Isaacson's book.

With SpaceX's Starlink, Musk controls the world's biggest network of low-Earth orbit broadband satellites. "Yet faced with little regulation and oversight, his erratic and personality-driven style has increasingly worried militaries and political leaders around the world, with the tech billionaire sometimes wielding his authority in unpredictable ways," a New York Times article on July 28 said.

"Musk's near total control of satellite Internet has raised alarms... he alone can decide to shut down Starlink Internet access for a customer or country, and he has the ability to leverage sensitive information that the service gathers. Such concerns have been heightened because no companies or governments have come close to matching what he has built," the article said.

The NYT report, citing people familiar with the situation, said that Musk "has restricted Starlink access multiple times during the war."

US gains more control over Starlink use in Ukraine

The NYT report provides a slightly different description of the incident near Crimea than the one in the CNN report based on Isaacson's book. While the book reportedly says Musk ordered SpaceX engineers to preemptively disable Starlink's network in the area, the NYT report said that Musk "refused Ukraine's request last year to provide Starlink access near Crimea, the Russian-controlled peninsula, so it could send an explosive-filled maritime drone into Russian ships docked in the Black Sea."

Assuming both reports are accurate, Musk presumably denied the request after turning Starlink service off in the area. That would square with the new report that "Musk's decision... left Ukrainian officials begging him to turn the satellites back on."

The Pentagon's new deal with SpaceX involves 400 to 500 Starlink terminals and gives the US more control over how they are used, the July 28 NYT report said:

The deal gives the Pentagon control of setting where Starlink's Internet signal works inside Ukraine for those new devices to carry out "key capabilities and certain missions," two people familiar with the deal said. This appeared intended to provide Ukraine with dedicated terminals and services to conduct sensitive functions without fear of interruption.

Unlike traditional defense contractors, whose weapon sales to foreign countries are typically done through the federal government, Starlink is a commercial product. That allows Mr. Musk to act in ways that sometimes do not align with US interests, such as when SpaceX said it could not continue funding Starlink in Ukraine, said Gregory C. Allen, a former Defense Department official who worked at Blue Origin.

After Shotwell's comments in February, an adviser to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy wrote that companies are either on the side of Ukraine and "the right to freedom" or on the side of Russia "and its 'right' to kill and seize territories. SpaceX (Starlink) and Mrs. Shotwell should choose a specific option."

Listing image: Getty Images | Yasuyoshi Chiba

Photo of Jon Brodkin
Jon Brodkin Senior IT Reporter
Jon is a Senior IT Reporter for Ars Technica. He covers the telecom industry, Federal Communications Commission rulemakings, broadband consumer affairs, court cases, and government regulation of the tech industry.
943 Comments