For a first offence perhaps a tad extreme.Given these pilots are endangering thousands of lives, maybe more than a fine is appropriate. 25 to life.
Need to look up Lynda and Stewart Resnick. Their company OWNS the water rights in a LOT of California. Her and her husband own The Wonderful Company, Pistachios, POM, Fiji water among other brands. Not to mention all the water CA has pumped out into the ocean to
"protect" some fish.
If only we spent our money on fire prevention / brush removal and prescribed burns instead of Gavins toy choo-choo train. This fire is not "Gavins's fault" but he has done 0 to improve anything with regard to wildland fire prevention and instead spent his time pissing on Trump and having it blow back in his face.
Oh well - apparently there is nothing that can be done then. I guess the people should just move away rather than rebuild ... /s
But seriously, whilst not all fires are equal - our responses to fires are not equal as well. In Australia, the West seems to do a bit better than the eastern states. That is not to say that there are less fires, it is just that less structures are damaged and destroyed. One of the reasons might be because homes in the West are built using double brick rather than brick veneer, but a simpler and more cost effective reason is because they use larger fire breaks (bulldozers clearing paths away from trees, brush and debris)
Seeing the news about abandoned cars blocking roads, preventing access for firefighters seems to indicate that firebreaks do not exist in LA, or not enough of them exists - because firebreaks are not just to slow fires, but also allow access for firefighters and firefighting equipment. The large swaths of homes burnt down also seems to indicate that a lot of these homes are highly flammable. They don't need to be built with steel and concrete, but there are other options such as brick, stone, and clay/terracotta tiles. Even insulation should be fire retardant.
This is something I learned this year during the floods in Europe: you can't shut down an entire gas network when the endpoints are presumed open. That allows for dirt and other stuff to get into the pipes (possibly further), potentially destroying the entire network.You'd think the gas company could shut off entire neighbourhoods remotely instead of having to send people out to individual lots. Or are you talking about flaring off the gas left in the lines between the neighbourhood shutoff and the individual lots?
I know you don't have answers to all the questions yet, which is fine, but this still seems like half a story when you don't report on any of the outrageous and baseless claims being made.
Pretty sure the reason is because, relatively speaking, nobody lives in the West but ok, sounds like you've got it all figured out.In Australia, the West seems to do a bit better than the eastern states. That is not to say that there are less fires, it is just that less structures are damaged and destroyed. One of the reasons might be because homes in the West are built using double brick rather than brick veneer, but a simpler and more cost effective reason is because they use larger fire breaks (bulldozers clearing paths away from trees, brush and debris)
Slavery was never really abolished... Just curtailed.Something like 30% of CalFire’s force is non-violent inmates being paid a dollar and a half, I think? Inmates who cannot then use that experience after release to get a firefighting job… because of their criminal record.
...and?It comes down to this fires don't start by themselves they have to have a ignition source be it
man,electrical or lighting.
This is misleading, Eric.The Palisades wildfire and other nearby conflagrations were well-predicted days in advance
I suspect this slant on social media is probably a right-wing racist dogwhistle campaign.Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has taken considerable flack for being out of the country this week as part of a delegation to celebrate the inauguration of Ghana President John Mahama
That comes across as a little snippy. Perhaps some time at this West Australia policy, information, and guidance links page and you'll have a takeaway similar to mine: that it's not all figured out but a lot of water has flowed under the bridge on the way to getting some solid useful solutions.Pretty sure the reason is because, relatively speaking, nobody lives in the West but ok, sounds like you've got it all figured out.
LosAngeles also has the largest homeless population in the USA, estimated around 80,000. Anyone could have stared the fires.
I'm putting this in a separate comment as it is largely a separate idea that should be judged separately.
I believe all humans deserve the basic necessities of life like stable sources of food, water, housing, and healthcare, even the most repugnant among us. Just because these humans may be morally corrupt, and the stable housing that they lost is luxurious, does not change the reality that they have been deprived of something I believe is deserved by all (stable housing) and that they are, in very real ways, (though to a lesser degree than many) are suffering. Would I prefer that we didn't have single family dwellings that took up 20 million dollars worth of resources? Absolutely! Do I think that the accumulation of that much wealth is just? Well that's in the neighbourhood of my upper limit. However human suffering in general should not be any more palatable simply because we don't like some aspect of that persons behaviour. Yes, I sometimes take pleasure in the suffering of those I feel are evil, especially when that suffering is a direct consequence of their actions, but I'm not proud of that and I do feel empathy towards the suffering of even the most deplorable humans.
Is this true? How does this not classify as slavery?
Code changes have been made over the years. Wood shake roofs were outlawed here decades ago. There are also now requirements for things like attic vents so that burning embers cannot get inside. Trouble is, these codes are only for new construction. There are probably still houses in southern California with wood shake roofs.So, if this sort of thing is only going to get more common in future, are there any practical changes to building codes that could help reduce the flammability of neighbourhoods without compromising seismic resilience?
Climate change may also, rather than a little push, be regarded as part of that culmination.This is what happens to any society when the gulf between rich and poor becomes so great. There is a breakdown of what constitutes ‘common good’; lack of investment in basic infrastructure, austerity for the poor and tax breaks for the rich, poor environmental practices —— and all of it culminated to produce the fires. Climate change just gave it all a little push.
Pretty sure the reason is because, relatively speaking, nobody lives in the West but ok, sounds like you've got it all figured out.
Completely agree. Couldn't believe the article was over at two pieces of information. There's lots more in the comments, at least.I know you don't have answers to all the questions yet, which is fine, but this still seems like half a story when you don't report on any of the outrageous and baseless claims being made.
Did he blame Texas and it's terrible governor for 250+ people dying when their power grid died for 2 weeks due to stupid government decisions not to join National power grid? I'm guessing... not some how.If only California raked its forests better.....
Judging by the political changes lately most Americans are regressing back to caveman levels anyway. This will sort itself out.So, if this sort of thing is only going to get more common in future, are there any practical changes to building codes that could help reduce the flammability of neighbourhoods without compromising seismic resilience?
I think you're vastly overestimating the amount of salt that could be delivered to an area, the amount of vegetation in residential neighborhoods, and ignoring that LA is a sea-side area where plants have evolved at least a minimum of tolerance for salt. Compared to any midwestern city salting roads, the amount of salt we're discussing is minimal.Salt the earth? Please re-think that. Ecosystems recover from fire. Not from poisoned earth.
Concrete block is far more affordable than brick. Given that we're talking about an earthquake prone area, I suspect one would have to fill the voids with poured concrete and rebar strategically, but the same structural concern would exist for brick.Practical - maybe. Affordable - probably not. Building codes prioritize loss of life over loss of property and are generally designed to protect the building for long enough to allow people to escape and/or be rescued before major collapse. There are requirements for structures made of combustible materials (wood) to be a certain distance from other structures to prevent a localized fire from spreading, but in general, building codes have very little authority over what happens outside of the building - that primarily falls on local zoning ordinances that establish fire/flood districts or other unique conditions with unique compliance requirements. Another commenter mentioned steel and concrete, which are already in most new homes, just not on the outside as that would be prohibitively expensive to the general homebuyer. Brick is probably the most cost effective non combustible cladding material for homes but you typically don't build roofs out of it and it's usually supported behind by wood framing.
As 21five posted, there is a valid opportunity for a seaside city to pull from the ocean as a "last resort"--that poster's phrase, and I am fine with that. I would be concerned with pumping saltwater into an ecosystem NOT evolved with plantings that tolerate seawater. Using it my town? Sure, if other options fail--I'm a mile from the beach. Hell, Dublin was saved from a massive fire by dumping manure from local stables onto the burning whisky flowing through the gutters.I think you're vastly overestimating the amount of salt that could be delivered to an area, the amount of vegetation in residential neighborhoods, and ignoring that LA is a sea-side area where plants have evolved at least a minimum of tolerance for salt. Compared to any midwestern city salting roads, the amount of salt we're discussing is minimal.
Even if it does, it's not an issue with prisoners:Is this true? How does this not classify as slavery?
US constitution, 13th amendment.Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted
I wasn't suggesting fighting undeveloped areas with sea water. I was suggesting LA County (and/or City) protect their structures with such. Most of the salt would run off into the drainage or sewers the same as it does in the Midwest. Have you seen how much salt is added to roads? Amazingly, that doesn't kill the local vegetation and it's certainly not adapted to that.As 21five posted, there is a valid opportunity for a seaside city to pull from the ocean as a "last resort"--that poster's phrase, and I am fine with that. I would be concerned with pumping saltwater into an ecosystem NOT evolved with plantings that tolerate seawater. Using it my town? Sure, if other options fail--I'm a mile from the beach. Hell, Dublin was saved from a massive fire by dumping manure from local stables onto the burning whisky flowing through the gutters.
In the hills above Pasadena? Only if you want to make re-growing the vegetation that helps prevent massive landslides much, much less likely to happen. Putting out a fire that way would be quite the Pyrrhic victory.
Los Angeles, both city and county, is vast. Localized use, sure. There are better options than to figuratively throw out the baby with the salty bathwater.I wasn't suggesting fighting undeveloped areas with sea water. I was suggesting LA County (and/or City) protect their structures with such. Most of the salt would run off into the drainage or sewers the same as it does in the Midwest. Have you seen how much salt is added to roads? Amazingly, that doesn't kill the local vegetation and it's certainly not adapted to that.
Such use would require local boost pumps. One just wouldn't install them outside of residential areas.Los Angeles, both city and county, is vast. Localized use, sure. There are better options than to figuratively throw out the baby with the salty bathwater.
I'll consider putting some boundaries on the original, rather broad suggestion to just pump seawater, to have been a good investment for my insomniac wee hours.Such use would require local boost pumps. One just wouldn't install them outside of residential areas.
They need oxygen as well. So, your point is?It comes down to this fires don't start by themselves they have to have a ignition source be it
man,electrical or lighting.
(snort!) Except where any Musk-related article is concerned.I consider Eric's name on an article to be the definitive gold-standard for impartial