Apple appeal to Investigatory Powers Tribunal may be the first case of its type.
See full article...
See full article...
they know, they just dont careSigh, I guess a new generation of leaders need to be educated: if you create a backdoor for government, it will be used by criminals. Any encryption with a backdoor is no encryption. Encryption is math, and math doesn't care about your political stance.
Haven't you heard? There's been a change around here. US Government don't care.what recourse is there for Apple? It seems like Apple may need the US to step in
Why would the US step in? they want the same thing. If Apple does it for the UK, they get it, too. (they being the government. I am, unfortunately, a US citizen, but this regime is not one I support in basically any way).what recourse is there for Apple? It seems like Apple may need the US to step in
The government knows exactly what they are doing.Sigh, I guess a new generation of leaders need to be educated: if you create a backdoor for government, it will be used by criminals. Any encryption with a backdoor is no encryption. Encryption is math, and math doesn't care about your political stance.
They were thinking "Uh, does this law say I can do that? Well, let's do it."As for the UK request, what exactly were they thinking?
Haven't you heard? There's been a change around here. US Government don't care.
Hopefully the entities that use the Apple cloud know to encrypt prior to putting it into the cloud. Won't be as seamless unfortunately.The government knows exactly what they are doing.
Phase 1. Create law requiring backdoor access.
Phase 2. Instead of giving a backdoor, the company stops encryption.
Phase 3. Now the data is no longer encrypted and the government have their backdoor, which is now a front door, that is wide open for them to take advantage of.
Apple didn't give them a backdoor (which they are correct in doing). Unfortunately, in removing the encryption, they have basically handed the keys over to anything in the iCloud. Damned if they do and damned if they don't.
For what? The internal affairs of a sovereign nation?what recourse is there for Apple? It seems like Apple may need the US to step in
Infiltration, like when they asked Apple to unlock the Iphone of that shooter. The FBI was forced to go to a Israeli security company, likely closely connected to the Mossad.Was it not the case that Apple appeared to have backdoored for PRISM per the Snowden-leaked presentations, or was that an NSA infiltration?
I was called to jury service in London a few years back. Two of the cases relied on CCTV. Both times, the CCTV wasn't worked. So, manky as well as skeevy...The UK always seems 1 step ahead of the US in terms of privacy invasion. Their CCTV alone is skeevy as hell.
Because they are the government, and they can do whatever they want to, ultimately, unless the people change the government.Another issue here: how can the government publicly punish an individual or corporation for refusing a secret order? At some point, it has to become public or the justice system is totally corrupted. Same goes for the US FISA orders, although those usually have a sunset clause.
It's not exactly an internal affair if it affects all iPhone users worldwide, including politicians of other sovereign nations who use iPhones.For what? The internal affairs of a sovereign nation?
It is absolutely appropriate for Apple to go to the US to ask them to put pressure on the UK here. Think of cases where other countries arrest our citizens - the US negotiates to get them back, if they determine it's in the public interest to do so. US trade negotiators put pressure on other countries to give our companies breaks (tax breaks, regulatory approvals, etc.). This would be very similar, and is one of three main options Apple has other than compliance (UK legal route; US pressure; removal of all operations from the UK).For what? The internal affairs of a sovereign nation?
what recourse is there for Apple? It seems like Apple may need the US to step in
The United Stages could enact a law making it illegal for Apple to disclose data belonging to its resident citizens to a foreign power. This would give Apple standing to challenge the UK edict in an international court.For what? The internal affairs of a sovereign nation?
Stop selling iPhones in the UK.what recourse is there for Apple? It seems like Apple may need the US to step in
The US Government wouldn't need to "follow." The UK is a Five Eyes nation; any signals intelligence (and way more, but technically "just" sigint) they have access to, the US has access to. And what they're asking for is a backdoor into all Apple users' data worldwide.If Apple caves in to this kind of demand, then the US Government will quickly follow.
A backdoor for one purpose will quickly evolve into something much worse for all of us.
Imagine "High Minded Citizens' or Governments" creating software to constantly go through user data, all with the intent of weeding out "TBD" subversive content.
View attachment 104248
Correction: if you create a backdoor for the government, it's already being used by criminals – they just happen to be in government.Sigh, I guess a new generation of leaders need to be educated: if you create a backdoor for government, it will be used by criminals. Any encryption with a backdoor is no encryption. Encryption is math, and math doesn't care about your political stance.
The USA already has basically the same thing, through those national security letters that target origanizations are legally obligated to lie about.Why would the US step in? they want the same thing. If Apple does it for the UK, they get it, too. (they being the government. I am, unfortunately, a US citizen, but this regime is not one I support in basically any way).
Sure they do.do these politicians ever think these things through?