This analysis is objectively incorrect and even dishonest.It’s objectively a good phone—good enough for the vast majority of people. It has a nearly top-tier screen (though it clocks in at 60Hz, while some Android phones close to this price point manage 120Hz), a camera system that delivers on quality even if it lacks special features seen in flagships, strong connectivity, and performance far above what you’d expect at this price.
The 16e provides a mediocre experience (for 2025 standards) compared to mid-range Android phones of today, not only at this price point but significantly cheaper. You don't need a flagship today to get more capable camera systems.
The benchmark part (and the way it's emphasized in the review) is irrelevant and misleading, it doesn't have a real impact on user experience, unlike the 60Hz screen.
Unless one is locked in the Apple ecosystem, there is not much reason for anyone to buy this phone.
Last edited:
Upvote
-21
(8
/
-29)