Skip to content
difficult mode: engage

Real robotaxi service gets a step closer in San Francisco (Updated)

Waymo and Cruise have both applied for permits to deploy a commercial service.

Jonathan M. Gitlin | 79
One of Waymo's sensor-studded Jaguar I-Paces observes a pedestrian crossing the road in front of it.
One of Waymo's sensor-studded Jaguar I-Paces observes a pedestrian crossing the road in front of it. Credit: Waymo
One of Waymo's sensor-studded Jaguar I-Paces observes a pedestrian crossing the road in front of it. Credit: Waymo

Update, 12:07 pm: Waymo reached out to clarify that it has actually applied for a drivered deployment permit, which would let it carry fare-paying passengers but with a driver in the car.

Original story: The day that robotaxis roam the streets of San Francisco looking for fare-paying customers is getting closer. This week, Reuters reported that both Waymo and Cruise have applied to California's Department of Motor Vehicles for permits to deploy driverless vehicles. The permit on its own isn't sufficient to begin operating a commercial robotaxi service, but it is an important milestone on the way to achieving that.

For several months now, Waymo has operated a fully driverless commercial taxi service in the suburbs of Phoenix, Arizona. But as Ars alum Tim Lee wrote recently, "Suburban Phoenix is a terrible place to run a taxi service."

Ars Video

 

A sun-blessed suburb in the Southwest, designed with the car in mind as the primary mode of transport, is as close to easy mode for an autonomous vehicle as it's possible to get outside the confines of private test tracks or a gigantic retirement village. That in turn means that the Phoenix suburbs have limited value when it comes to teaching an autonomous vehicle how to cope with the big bad world. And since having a car is virtually a prerequisite for living in a suburb like Chandler, the people who live there don't need to use taxis often.

San Francisco is not easy mode. It grew organically rather than being master-planned and has a much higher population density than Chandler. There are more cyclists and more pedestrians, and sometimes those pedestrians step out into the street from between parked cars.

One of Cruise's sensor-covered Chevrolet Bolt EVs parked in San Francisco
One of Cruise's sensor-covered Chevrolet Bolt EVs parked in San Francisco.
One of Cruise's sensor-covered Chevrolet Bolt EVs parked in San Francisco. Credit: Cruise

Cruise realized several years ago that the Arizona suburbs were of limited value and decided to concentrate on San Francisco, stating that in the Californian city, the company's "vehicles encounter challenging (and often absurd) situations up to 46 times more often than other places self-driving cars are tested." And in February, Waymo announced that it was expanding its test program there, too.

Both Cruise and Waymo already hold DMV permits to conduct driverless testing in California. According to Reuters, Waymo's application to the DMV for a permit to deploy a driverless service was received on January 19, with Cruise submitting its application on March 29. Should they be approved, they would join Nuro, which has had a permit to deploy its autonomous delivery bots since December 2020. However, neither Cruise nor Waymo was ready to tell Ars when their fare-paying service might start.

Listing image: Waymo

Photo of Jonathan M. Gitlin
Jonathan M. Gitlin Automotive Editor
Jonathan is the Automotive Editor at Ars Technica. He has a BSc and PhD in Pharmacology. In 2014 he decided to indulge his lifelong passion for the car by leaving the National Human Genome Research Institute and launching Ars Technica's automotive coverage. He lives in Washington, DC.
79 Comments