Ars Technica logo. Serving the PC enthusiast for over 5x10-2 centuries  

Subscribe to Ars Technica!

Have news? Send it in.

 
Ars Guides.
  Buyer's Guide
  How-To's & Tweaks
  Product Reviews
  Ars Shopping Engine

Technopaedia.
  Technical Blackpapers
  CPU Theory & Praxis
  Ars OpenForum
  Search Ars

Columnar Edifice.
  Wankerdesk
  AskArs!
  Diary of a Geek
  Game.Ars Report   Mac.Ars takes on...
  Linux.Ars

Site Info.
  Subscribe to Ars
  Ars Merchandise
  Who We Ars
  Advertising
  Links



Inside the GNOME 2.4 Desktop & Developer Platform

   by Jorge "whiprush" Castro, Phil "philmes" Messenger, Stephan "windi" Windischmann, Robert "xcasex" Renling, and Amit "Prototyped" Gurdasani

(This feature for subscribers only!


The HIG: Bringing Consistency and Accessibility to the Desktop

If there was a heart of GNOME development, it would be the GNOME Human Interface Guidelines (HIG). The HIG, penned after much usability testing conducted by Sun Microsystems, specifies exactly how a GNOME application should appear and behave. Long shackled by its dependence on CDE, Sun chose to sponsor GNOME development and has been steadily investing in usability and accessibility. This investment has paid off, as GNOME has reaped usability awards in just a short time since release 2.0.

GNOME's accessibility features make the desktop highly usable by the disabled, something that has traditionally been a weak point of UNIX desktops. Making a desktop accessible to disabled persons is not a simple task. There is a wide range of disabilities, and about as many assistive technologies (such as Braille keyboards and screen readers) designed to help those with special requirements interact with computers. These tools range in complexity from simple (such as the screen magnifier and on-screen keyboard) to advanced (such as the screenreader that uses a text-to-speech engine, and the ability to interface with Braille devices).

The HIG also describes how the desktop should feel to a user and how windows ought to be laid out and presented. It provides developers with consistent guidelines according to which GNOME applications should be authored. Most developers striving to get their projects included in the official GNOME release end up �HIGifying� their applications. The end result for the user is a consistent, integrated desktop.

The GNOME Desktop

The Default Desktop

Now that you are familiar with how GNOME fits in as your Linux desktop and its general design goals, we can take a look at the default desktop. Upon launching GNOME, the user is met with a splash screen containing progress icons before a clean desktop appears. Like many of the larger open-source software projects, GNOME continues to improve in performance as the code base matures. Each successive GNOME release feels faster and more responsive than preceding releases, and even more so on the latest development kernels. Here's a look:

The default GNOME desktop
The default desktop with Nautilus open, displaying the new multirooted tree view

The default desktop should be familiar to Mac OS X users. It consists of two panels�a top panel with a menu on the left; a clock, a calendar, and a volume control on the right; and a bottom bar left mostly blank for buttons indicating windows. The GNOME desktop environment is characterized by the panels and the desktop drawn by Nautilus. The panels can hold all sorts of program launchers and applets that sit in the panels, such as a CPU meter, an audio volume control, or even a local weather report.

Previous versions of GNOME contained different types of panels�floating, edge, corner and menu, characterized by their shapes and where they were �anchored� on the screen. The functionality of all of these has now been collapsed into just one kind of panel, which can be configured to behave like any of the former kinds of panels. The special menu applet, previously fixed in the top left of the screen, can now be detached and placed in any panel, anywhere.

The Application Menu
The GNOME Menu applet


The standard applets that come with GNOME have also been substantially improved, with much HIG work being done on them for release 2.4, especially for keyboard navigation. The clock applet now has a built-in mini-calendar, a nifty feature first seen in Red Hat's GNOME desktop. Our favorite new applet by far is the Post-It note�style applet, which lets you paste notes to yourself on your desktop (much like the Post-It notes that decorate many a monitor's front), and remains sticky between sessions. All items on a panel can now be �locked� into place, ensuring that unintentional mouse actions do not alter your desktop unless you want to do so.

GNOME users with multiple monitors will appreciate the improvements in the 2.4 release. Prior versions of GNOME were plagued with poor dual monitor support, with panels and windows spawning in seemingly random places. Metacity, the GNOME window manager, now supports the Xinerama X11 extension properly, so that it knows what display a window should spawn on, and how to properly maximize a window within its display.

Anyone who has used GTK+ applications to any significant extent will love to hate the GTK+ file selector. Indeed, it appears to be traditional for GNOME reviews to slam this dialog box, with its separate directory (folder) and file selectors, and poor filtering behavior. Sadly, GNOME users will have to live with it until release 2.6. Release 2.4, using GTK+ 2.2, still uses it. While it is a poor dialog box, some distributors such as Ximian have patched in a different dialog box, which has also made its way into some distributions, e.g. Debian.

 

Next: Mmm, Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) icons

 


Dual 2.5GHz Power Mac G5 review

The Sims 2 review

Pipelining: an overview (Part II)

System Guide: September edition

Pipelining: an overview (Part I)

Chris Sawyer's Locomotion review

Multicore, dual-core, and the future of Intel

System Guide: gaming boxes

TrackIR3 Pro review

Doom 3: the review

PowerPC on Apple: An Architectural History, Part I

Virtual machine shootout: Virtual PC vs. VMware

The Pentium: An Architectural History � Part II

Joint Operations: Typhoon Rising game review

AirPort Express review

The Pentium: An Architectural History � Part I

The Ars guide to PCI Express

Beyond Divinity game review

The future of Prescott

Interview with Mozilla.org's Scott Collins

Thief: Deadly Shadows game review

USB 2.0 Hi-Speed Flash drive review

A closer look at Intel's processor numbers and 2004 road map

Far Cry game review

Dell Latitude D800 laptop review

HP Compaq nc6000 laptop review

Hitman: Contracts game review

Deploying a small business Windows 2003 network

Alternative AIM clients for Windows

Inside GNOME 2.6

/etc

OpenForum

Distributed Computing

Take the Poll Technica

FAQ: Celeron overclocking

 

Copyright © 1998-2004 Ars Technica, LLC